Team vs Scotland
Moderator: Puja
- Stom
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Team vs Scotland
What is the ref doing? Why would we take this down?
-
- Posts: 8527
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Team vs Scotland
No.Which Tyler wrote:Wad 14 blue ever on his feet there?
- Puja
- Posts: 17794
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Team vs Scotland
How was Graham on his feet for that turnover?
Not the point - Scotland did well to stay in the game and eke out a win and we threw it away.
Puja
Not the point - Scotland did well to stay in the game and eke out a win and we threw it away.
Puja
Backist Monk
- Shiny
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2017 3:57 pm
- Location: Bradford
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9322
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Team vs Scotland
TBF, ref may have bottled the last 2 decisions - but we should never have been in the position that either mattered - that much is 100% LCD's fault.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14578
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Team vs Scotland
I think it’s a bit more complex than that.FKAS wrote:LCD cost us that game.
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team vs Scotland
Why the feck was Ford brought on and Youngs given 80!! LCD an idiot, our wings pants and not bringing Nowell on until 81mins on the clock.
Great stuff Eddie
Great stuff Eddie
- jngf
- Posts: 1581
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: Team vs Scotland
Well deserved win by Scotland.
Big point: Sam Simmonds looks most potent when presented with the ball in his hands to exploit his gap using his explosive pace. I simply don’t see him looking at home with the tight “piano shifting” elements of no.8 at test level. He’s a very talented player but you start him at either 6,7 or at a pinch 12 at this level.
Btw what was the point of sticking Dombrandt at 6 and leaving Simmonds at 8 when Ludlum was subbed?
Big point: Sam Simmonds looks most potent when presented with the ball in his hands to exploit his gap using his explosive pace. I simply don’t see him looking at home with the tight “piano shifting” elements of no.8 at test level. He’s a very talented player but you start him at either 6,7 or at a pinch 12 at this level.
Btw what was the point of sticking Dombrandt at 6 and leaving Simmonds at 8 when Ludlum was subbed?
Last edited by jngf on Sat Feb 05, 2022 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team vs Scotland
Indeed. Our barrow defence leading up to it was compounded by Mallins missing the tackleMellsblue wrote:I think it’s a bit more complex than that.FKAS wrote:LCD cost us that game.
-
- Posts: 2303
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Team vs Scotland
YesFKAS wrote:No.Which Tyler wrote:Wad 14 blue ever on his feet there?
- Mr Mwenda
- Posts: 2461
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am
Re: Team vs Scotland
Yes. But God I hate games like that. Really unimpressive.Puja wrote:How was Graham on his feet for that turnover?
Not the point - Scotland did well to stay in the game and eke out a win and we threw it away.
Puja
- El Tigre
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:43 pm
Re: Team vs Scotland
All Ford's fault, right?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14578
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Team vs Scotland
Yep. It’s a good job he only got 20ish mins.El Tigre wrote:All Ford's fault, right?
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team vs Scotland
Yes, of course, that’s what cost usjngf wrote:Well deserved win by Scotland.
Big point: Sam Simmonds looks most potent when presented with the ball in his hands to exploit his gap using his explosive pace. I simply don’t see him looking at home with the tight “piano shifting” elements of no.8 at test level. He’s a very talented player but you start him at either 6,7 or at a pinch 12.
- Mr Mwenda
- Posts: 2461
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am
Re: Team vs Scotland
I thought Ford did show why Farrell does the kicking for touch from penalties.El Tigre wrote:All Ford's fault, right?
-
- Posts: 8527
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Team vs Scotland
Malins seemed to slip over when going into contact a few times. Perhaps a poor boot choice there.p/d wrote:Indeed. Our barrow defence leading up to it was compounded by Mallins missing the tackleMellsblue wrote:I think it’s a bit more complex than that.FKAS wrote:LCD cost us that game.
LCD either catches or even concedes a normal try there and I think we're ok. The period of being down a man gave Scotland a lot of momentum.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9322
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Team vs Scotland
In terms of "what went wrong?" yes, much.Mellsblue wrote:I think it’s a bit more complex than that.FKAS wrote:LCD cost us that game.
In terms of "what lost us that game?" no, not even slightly.
Nothing else resulted in such a momentum change. Nothing else cost us a man on the pitch. Nothing else turned a point lead to points level, to go with the momentum change.
Last edited by Which Tyler on Sat Feb 05, 2022 6:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6001
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Team vs Scotland
In fairness to you, I thought Ludlam was one of our best players, but I absolutely refuse to accept that win was ‘deserved’ by Scotland.jngf wrote:Well deserved win by Scotland.
Big point: Sam Simmonds looks most potent when presented with the ball in his hands to exploit his gap using his explosive pace. I simply don’t see him looking at home with the tight “piano shifting” elements of no.8 at test level. He’s a very talented player but you start him at either 6,7 or at a pinch 12 at this level.
Btw what was the point of sticking Dombrandt at 6 and leaving Simmonds at 8 when Ludlum was subbed?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14578
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Team vs Scotland
A distinction without a difference.Which Tyler wrote:In terms of "what went wrong?" yes, much.Mellsblue wrote:I think it’s a bit more complex than that.FKAS wrote:LCD cost us that game.
In terms of "what lost us that game?" no, not even slightly.
-
- Posts: 8527
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Team vs Scotland
Ford came on because Smith barely featured despite having lots of ball.p/d wrote:Why the feck was Ford brought on and Youngs given 80!! LCD an idiot, our wings pants and not bringing Nowell on until 81mins on the clock.
Great stuff Eddie
Youngs played 80 mins because Randall isn't an international scrum half and Eddie didn't want someone that can't kick at 9 when we were in an arm wrestle in poor conditions.
- El Tigre
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:43 pm
Re: Team vs Scotland
Slade had been kicking to touch earlier. Not sure why he didn't take that oneMr Mwenda wrote:I thought Ford did show why Farrell does the kicking for touch from penalties.El Tigre wrote:All Ford's fault, right?
Last edited by El Tigre on Sat Feb 05, 2022 6:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Mr Mwenda
- Posts: 2461
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am
Re: Team vs Scotland
At the risk of agreeing with jngf, it's clear England need to find a way to use Simmonds better or find someone else. The Scots were ready for him and got a couple of turnovers from his charges.
-
- Posts: 3623
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Team vs Scotland
Putting LCD's dick move aside, Eddie Jones lost us that game.
We were completely in control thanks to Smith and the forwards, so why the fuck take one of our best players off and leave Youngs on the pitch?!
I stopped watching at the penalty try as I knew we'd lose from there.
We were completely in control thanks to Smith and the forwards, so why the fuck take one of our best players off and leave Youngs on the pitch?!
I stopped watching at the penalty try as I knew we'd lose from there.