Third Test
Moderator: Sandydragon
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: Third Test
According to Twitter:
Wales running metres: 193
Israel Dagg running metres: 196
Wales running metres: 193
Israel Dagg running metres: 196
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Third Test
Jesus. If that's true how the hell can gatland keep his job.Lizard wrote:According to Twitter:
Wales running metres: 193
Israel Dagg running metres: 196
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: Third Test
I can't find any player stats but Opta reports NZ 566m, Wales 193.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Jesus. If that's true how the hell can gatland keep his job.Lizard wrote:According to Twitter:
Wales running metres: 193
Israel Dagg running metres: 196
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10499
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Third Test
On the whole, I'd add Webb to that list, although some of his kicking today was sub par.Mikeyv wrote:Our first XV is just about able to give the blacks a game, but with only an (extremely) outside chance of a win.
Nearly all the second choice players are a mile off the standard required, imo.
Faletau and Liam Williams have been outstanding though.
Overall, just not good enough, regardless of the game plan. Our forwards were exposed badly too often but equally when they had the ball, the basic skill execution just wasn't good enough.
I lost count of the number of times that AB players went around our defence, or how often we kicked to them in acres of space.
The first two games were were competitive for much of the match. Today felt like on long period of defence, punctuated by the odd attacking moment that inevitably lacked vision, skill or composure.
- Mikeyv
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:20 pm
Re: Third Test
I wonder how many of those 566m were made after catching a Welsh kick, straight down their throat, and running in to the space before meeting a Welsh player.Lizard wrote:I can't find any player stats but Opta reports NZ 566m, Wales 193.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:Jesus. If that's true how the hell can gatland keep his job.Lizard wrote:According to Twitter:
Wales running metres: 193
Israel Dagg running metres: 196
We never learn, it seems.
- Mikeyv
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 5:20 pm
Re: Third Test
Webb and a couple of others were OK, but I thought Faletau and, to a slightly lesser extent, Williams were exceptional.Sandydragon wrote:On the whole, I'd add Webb to that list, although some of his kicking today was sub par.Mikeyv wrote:Our first XV is just about able to give the blacks a game, but with only an (extremely) outside chance of a win.
Nearly all the second choice players are a mile off the standard required, imo.
Faletau and Liam Williams have been outstanding though.
Overall, just not good enough, regardless of the game plan. Our forwards were exposed badly too often but equally when they had the ball, the basic skill execution just wasn't good enough.
I lost count of the number of times that AB players went around our defence, or how often we kicked to them in acres of space.
The first two games were were competitive for much of the match. Today felt like on long period of defence, punctuated by the odd attacking moment that inevitably lacked vision, skill or composure.
Agreed on the lousy kicking though, it was like a blast from the past, when Priestland was getting picked while badly out of form, and hoofing it straight back at them, even when we were ahead with minutes to play.
-
- Posts: 589
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:53 pm
Re: Third Test
Ah those were the days-being ahead with minutes to playMikeyv wrote:Webb and a couple of others were OK, but I thought Faletau and, to a slightly lesser extent, Williams were exceptional.Sandydragon wrote:On the whole, I'd add Webb to that list, although some of his kicking today was sub par.Mikeyv wrote:Our first XV is just about able to give the blacks a game, but with only an (extremely) outside chance of a win.
Nearly all the second choice players are a mile off the standard required, imo.
Faletau and Liam Williams have been outstanding though.
Overall, just not good enough, regardless of the game plan. Our forwards were exposed badly too often but equally when they had the ball, the basic skill execution just wasn't good enough.
I lost count of the number of times that AB players went around our defence, or how often we kicked to them in acres of space.
The first two games were were competitive for much of the match. Today felt like on long period of defence, punctuated by the odd attacking moment that inevitably lacked vision, skill or composure.
Agreed on the lousy kicking though, it was like a blast from the past, when Priestland was getting picked while badly out of form, and hoofing it straight back at them, even when we were ahead with minutes to play.
-
- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Third Test
good to see Dagg back at his best thoEugene Wrayburn wrote:Jesus. If that's true how the hell can gatland keep his job.Lizard wrote:According to Twitter:
Wales running metres: 193
Israel Dagg running metres: 196
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: Third Test
Indeed. He has made the most of his re-selection.Banquo wrote:good to see Dagg back at his best thoEugene Wrayburn wrote:Jesus. If that's true how the hell can gatland keep his job.Lizard wrote:According to Twitter:
Wales running metres: 193
Israel Dagg running metres: 196
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
-
- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Third Test
Is savea in receipt of special help? Looks to have regressed without the ball.Lizard wrote:Indeed. He has made the most of his re-selection.Banquo wrote:good to see Dagg back at his best thoEugene Wrayburn wrote: Jesus. If that's true how the hell can gatland keep his job.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Third Test
I suspect he's just a bit stale - there's been a lot of rugby in the past 18 months. It would have been very good for him if he'd gone off to try to get into the 7s.Banquo wrote:Is savea in receipt of special help? Looks to have regressed without the ball.Lizard wrote:Indeed. He has made the most of his re-selection.Banquo wrote: good to see Dagg back at his best tho
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Third Test
He has been pretty poor. He's not getting much rest soon either.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I suspect he's just a bit stale - there's been a lot of rugby in the past 18 months. It would have been very good for him if he'd gone off to try to get into the 7s.Banquo wrote:Is savea in receipt of special help? Looks to have regressed without the ball.Lizard wrote: Indeed. He has made the most of his re-selection.
Has he played much 7's?
- morepork
- Posts: 7529
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Third Test
Banquo wrote:He has been pretty poor. He's not getting much rest soon either.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I suspect he's just a bit stale - there's been a lot of rugby in the past 18 months. It would have been very good for him if he'd gone off to try to get into the 7s.Banquo wrote: Is savea in receipt of special help? Looks to have regressed without the ball.
Has he played much 7's?
With that gut?
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2307
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Third Test
That was kind of my point. Learning a different set of skills and focus on his running not his power. Wouldn't get away with a gut.morepork wrote:Banquo wrote:He has been pretty poor. He's not getting much rest soon either.Eugene Wrayburn wrote: I suspect he's just a bit stale - there's been a lot of rugby in the past 18 months. It would have been very good for him if he'd gone off to try to get into the 7s.
Has he played much 7's?
With that gut?
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5044
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: Third Test
I don't think you needed prescience to expect a NZ win.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'd like to claim prescience, but really no other result was likely.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'd say you were less competitive in the second match than the first, albeit the score ended up closer. By 60 minutes it was all over bar the shouting, they lifted out some key players and you scored a couple of consolation tries. It depends on whether they get their selection right and what the aims might be towards the end of the game. It's possible that you'll be closer, but I expect you to be carrying a bigger deficit at half time and at full time and I doubt you'll ever look like you could win this one.Son of Mathonwy wrote: You may say that but by the same argument the second test was less likely to be successful than the first. However we got a better result in the second test.
This said as before, our chance of winning is very small, and is pretty much dependent on our not having the traditional 15 minutes where we go to sleep somewhere in the match.
- Son of Mathonwy
- Posts: 5044
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 4:50 pm
Re: Third Test
Well, at last a return to the traditional Wales tour of NZ scoreline. A thrashing. No Welsh tries.
From playing well for 60 out of 80 minutes in the first 2 tests we were simply outclassed for 60 out of 80 minutes. Very sad. We had no answer to the sheer acceleration of Barrett, Dagg, Smith et al when they went wide, time and again they shredded our defences.
What great news that we have these coaches until after the next world cup. What great news that after 9 years at the helm they are just beginning to add some variation to our game (allegedly). And England kicking Australian butt just makes it feel all the worse. Gatland for the Lions? Only if the good coaches are unavailable.
From playing well for 60 out of 80 minutes in the first 2 tests we were simply outclassed for 60 out of 80 minutes. Very sad. We had no answer to the sheer acceleration of Barrett, Dagg, Smith et al when they went wide, time and again they shredded our defences.
What great news that we have these coaches until after the next world cup. What great news that after 9 years at the helm they are just beginning to add some variation to our game (allegedly). And England kicking Australian butt just makes it feel all the worse. Gatland for the Lions? Only if the good coaches are unavailable.
-
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:59 pm
- Location: Rhondda
Re: Third Test
I'm all fot Gats for the lions, Take Howler, Edwards and McBride and don't come back.Son of Mathonwy wrote:Gatland for the Lions? Only if the good coaches are unavailable.
-
- Posts: 12138
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Third Test
Did Paycheck get some decent exposure at least? Is Garland likely to persist with another back that can move the ball a bit?
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10499
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Third Test
Some moments with ball in hand. Yet skinned badly in defense more than once.Mikey Brown wrote:Did Paycheck get some decent exposure at least? Is Garland likely to persist with another back that can move the ball a bit?
-
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:59 pm
- Location: Rhondda
Re: Third Test
Who dafuq is paycheck?
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10499
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Third Test
Patches I assume.Ross. S wrote:Who dafuq is paycheck?
Edit: Blydi auto correct - Patchell
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Third Test
Sadly,...I think Patchell is increasingly looking like a player that doesn't fit with the overall gameplan. How long Wales can continue with this situation is a blydi mystery to me. The poor fecker is turning into the Welsh version of Dai Duckham.Mikey Brown wrote:Did Paycheck get some decent exposure at least? Is Garland likely to persist with another back that can move the ball a bit?
-
- Posts: 12138
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Third Test
Patches is closer as least. I'm impressed you realised who I meant.Sandydragon wrote:Patches I assume.Ross. S wrote:Who dafuq is paycheck?
Edit: Blydi auto correct - Patchell
It's a shame if you can't find a spot/use for him.
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Third Test
He ain't 'paycheck'.....that's balls. He's jumped ship from Caerdiff because they were clearly unable to utilitse him properly.Mikey Brown wrote:Patches is closer as least. I'm impressed you realised who I meant.Sandydragon wrote:Patches I assume.Ross. S wrote:Who dafuq is paycheck?
Edit: Blydi auto correct - Patchell
It's a shame if you can't find a spot/use for him.
The lad has massive talent and could have easily gone to the continent for big money. We shall see what happens at Llanelli.
The potential of next years Scarlets team is big.
-
- Posts: 12138
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Third Test
Yes, if he'd signed for Toulon/Metro it may have been more appropriate. It was just an autocorrect blunder.