Worcester v Harlequins Friday

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
fivepointer
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Worcester v Harlequins Friday

Post by fivepointer »

Warriors | 15 Noah Heward, 14 Perry Humphreys, 13 Oli Morris, 12 Seb Atkinson, 11 Alex Hearle, 10 Fin Smith, 9 Gareth Simpson, 1 Murray McCallum, 2 Niall Annett, 3 Christian Judge, 4 Matt Garvey, 5 Graham Kitchener, 6 Joe Batley, 7 Ted Hill (C), 8 Sione Vailanu.

Replacements | 16 Isaac Miller, 17 Ethan Waller, 18 Jay Tyack, 19 Andrew Kitchener, 20 Justin Clegg, 21 Will Chudley, 22 Billy Searle, 23 Tom Howe.

Harlequins | 15 Tyrone Green, 14 Joe Marchant, 13 Huw Jones, 12 Andre Esterhuizen, 11 Cadan Murley, 10 Will Edwards, 9 Danny Care, 1 Simon Kerrod, 2 Jack Walker, 3 Will Collier, 4 Matt Symons, 5 Hugh Tizard, 6 Stephan Liewes (C), 7 Tom Lawday, 8 Archie White.

Replacements | 16 Sam Riley, 17 Jordan Els, 18 Wilco Louw, 19 George Hammond, 20 Matas Jurevicius, 21 Lewis Gjaltema, 22 Tommy Allen, 23 Louis Lynagh.
switchskier
Posts: 2303
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm

Re: Worcester v Harlequins Friday

Post by switchskier »

How's Murray McCallum getting on? Edinburgh fans were really excited about him, but it was five years ago and he was playing tighthead. Still like to think that there's potential there and that appears to be two starts in a row ahead of Waller.

Is it just me or is that a huge quin's pack, with another two locks on the bench and two massive props on the bench.
User avatar
Magic_sponge
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:07 pm

Re: Worcester v Harlequins Friday

Post by Magic_sponge »

Been critical of Jones before but that's one hell of a try saving tackle
Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Worcester v Harlequins Friday

Post by Timbo »

If you’re deemed to have been short of the line going for a try it doesn’t seem at all fair that the defending team get a drop out. Need to amend that law.
User avatar
Magic_sponge
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2021 4:07 pm

Re: Worcester v Harlequins Friday

Post by Magic_sponge »

Don't particularly mind it myself but understand the reasoning to change it.

Wouldn't be surprised to see murley include in some sort of England squad one day soon. Not necessarily saying a 6N squad, but I think he's class. Fits a mould I think Jones likes too.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12208
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Worcester v Harlequins Friday

Post by Mikey Brown »

Yeah I think he’s underrated. A better player than Lynagh, brings some quite similar things to Nowell too but is actually fast.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Worcester v Harlequins Friday

Post by Banquo »

Timbo wrote:If you’re deemed to have been short of the line going for a try it doesn’t seem at all fair that the defending team get a drop out. Need to amend that law.
The whole drop out from your own line stuff needs a re- think.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17793
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Worcester v Harlequins Friday

Post by Puja »

Banquo wrote:
Timbo wrote:If you’re deemed to have been short of the line going for a try it doesn’t seem at all fair that the defending team get a drop out. Need to amend that law.
The whole drop out from your own line stuff needs a re- think.
I really like the the type where grounding a kick in goal is now a goal-line drop-out rather than a 22 (the bit which Nigel Owens rails against twice a game on commentary). Under the old rules, most attacking grubbers were a poor option, as the minute they rolled into goal, the opposition got to advance 22m and then kick long so you were often back in your own half. Now, the goal-line drop-out means that even a slightly overcooked grubber kick gives you a chance for another attack and the increased success of that ploy means that defence have to keep more people back covering, creating more space for the attack.

The held up over the line one, I can take or leave, but there has been a marked reduction in the amount of grinding around the corner this season, so it appears to be doing its job.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5845
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Worcester v Harlequins Friday

Post by Stom »

Mikey Brown wrote:Yeah I think he’s underrated. A better player than Lynagh, brings some quite similar things to Nowell too but is actually fast.
Is he that fast, though? I mean, the Quins back line isn’t quick, so maybe he just looks quick in comparison.
fivepointer
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Worcester v Harlequins Friday

Post by fivepointer »

I like Murley. He's quick enough i'd say. Quins will miss Tizard, who is developing into a really good grafting lock.

Wuss had their moments and are improving. Nice try at the end for young Atkinson who didnt look remotely out of place.
Post Reply