Sarries Vs Tigers

Moderator: Puja

User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14578
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:
FKAS wrote:That's a red card all day. Awful technique head to head first collision. CMK is bailing Sarries out time after time with their discipline. Tigers need him to wake up as we don't have enough attacking penetration currently.
green gets away with a bad one imo.
Think Green’s is worse. I’d like to know J Willis’s thoughts on that being pen only.
FKAS
Posts: 8524
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by FKAS »

Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote:
FKAS wrote:That's a red card all day. Awful technique head to head first collision. CMK is bailing Sarries out time after time with their discipline. Tigers need him to wake up as we don't have enough attacking penetration currently.
green gets away with a bad one imo.
Think Green’s is worse. I’d like to know J Willis’s thoughts on that being pen only.
The Sarries hooker pulled Nadolo through the ruck by his neck. Yellow for both or yellow for neither. As it stands only one was a penalty.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14578
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by Mellsblue »

FKAS wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote: green gets away with a bad one imo.
Think Green’s is worse. I’d like to know J Willis’s thoughts on that being pen only.
The Sarries hooker pulled Nadolo through the ruck by his neck. Yellow for both or yellow for neither. As it stands only one was a penalty.
You should note that the two posts I replied to were discussing the high tackle and the neck roll by Green but, cool, yellow for both, assuming it was a neck roll on Nadolo. I’d also suggest a drugs test for Sarries’ hooker.
Last edited by Mellsblue on Sat Mar 05, 2022 5:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by p/d »

We’re Mako’s 2 mins influential?
FKAS
Posts: 8524
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by FKAS »

Tigers paying for a lack of invention in attack. Yes CMK didn't clamp down on Sarries many infringements but you've got to take the game beyond the ref, particularly when Karl Dickson is still an option and he doesn't like rolling mauls.

Overly reliant on bullying the opposition pack which we couldn't do consistently and ball in hand we were just far to obvious and didn't give Ford much in the way of options with us increasingly looking at Scott or Nadolo to creat something. Need more disguise on our play if we're going to go toe to toe with the big boys.
fivepointer
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by fivepointer »

Thought we'd see a bit more from Ford but even he couldnt create anything for Tigers.

Fair play to Saracens, absorbed the pressure and came back to seal the win at the end. They're a tough side to beat.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

FKAS wrote:Tigers paying for a lack of invention in attack. Yes CMK didn't clamp down on Sarries many infringements but you've got to take the game beyond the ref, particularly when Karl Dickson is still an option and he doesn't like rolling mauls.

Overly reliant on bullying the opposition pack which we couldn't do consistently and ball in hand we were just far to obvious and didn't give Ford much in the way of options with us increasingly looking at Scott or Nadolo to creat something. Need more disguise on our play if we're going to go toe to toe with the big boys.
Fair dinkum- and to be fair to CMK , who I don’t rate, he did dish out a huge number of pens and a yellow to Sarries…though a couple were iffy and he missed some more obvious stuff.

Yes Tigers need an edge, but Steward would help…and there were a lot of changes, so all not lost ;)
Tigersman
Posts: 1540
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:11 am

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by Tigersman »

Tigers missed Montoya and Kelly
Montoya for the tight stuff
Kelly because his passing especially the long passing creates so many chances.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

p/d wrote:We’re Mako’s 2 mins influential?
They missed him for 78
FKAS
Posts: 8524
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by FKAS »

Banquo wrote:
FKAS wrote:Tigers paying for a lack of invention in attack. Yes CMK didn't clamp down on Sarries many infringements but you've got to take the game beyond the ref, particularly when Karl Dickson is still an option and he doesn't like rolling mauls.

Overly reliant on bullying the opposition pack which we couldn't do consistently and ball in hand we were just far to obvious and didn't give Ford much in the way of options with us increasingly looking at Scott or Nadolo to creat something. Need more disguise on our play if we're going to go toe to toe with the big boys.
Fair dinkum- and to be fair to CMK , who I don’t rate, he did dish out a huge number of pens and a yellow to Sarries…though a couple were iffy and he missed some more obvious stuff.

Yes Tigers need an edge, but Steward would help…and there were a lot of changes, so all not lost ;)
Yeah the yellow should have been red and no warnings despite a litany of infringements five metres out didn't impress but when you waste that many chances and fail to take the ref out the game you've got to look at yourselves.

Steward from fullback would have added some security but as Tigersman said Kelly was also a big miss today. He's really taken to the 12 role and both his physicality and distribution are really showing up well. Montoya and Liebenburg are huge leaders up front as well as physical carriers that might have helped us bull our way through.

6 of the starting forwards were 22 or under. Only the locks were older so there's some positives to take especially with how the young props got on against far more experienced opposition.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

FKAS wrote:
Banquo wrote:
FKAS wrote:Tigers paying for a lack of invention in attack. Yes CMK didn't clamp down on Sarries many infringements but you've got to take the game beyond the ref, particularly when Karl Dickson is still an option and he doesn't like rolling mauls.

Overly reliant on bullying the opposition pack which we couldn't do consistently and ball in hand we were just far to obvious and didn't give Ford much in the way of options with us increasingly looking at Scott or Nadolo to creat something. Need more disguise on our play if we're going to go toe to toe with the big boys.
Fair dinkum- and to be fair to CMK , who I don’t rate, he did dish out a huge number of pens and a yellow to Sarries…though a couple were iffy and he missed some more obvious stuff.

Yes Tigers need an edge, but Steward would help…and there were a lot of changes, so all not lost ;)
Yeah the yellow should have been red and no warnings despite a litany of infringements five metres out didn't impress but when you waste that many chances and fail to take the ref out the game you've got to look at yourselves.

Steward from fullback would have added some security but as Tigersman said Kelly was also a big miss today. He's really taken to the 12 role and both his physicality and distribution are really showing up well. Montoya and Liebenburg are huge leaders up front as well as physical carriers that might have helped us bull our way through.

6 of the starting forwards were 22 or under. Only the locks were older so there's some positives to take especially with how the young props got on against far more experienced opposition.
Tbh I don’t agree yellow to red, and he penalised Sarries for the wrong things - but still penalised them mightily.

Steward would help a lot in attack at AP level.

Chessum is a good un.
FKAS
Posts: 8524
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by FKAS »

Yeah Chessum has really stepped up this season. Couple of good lineout steals and a strong finish for the try would have impressed Eddie. Looks like a great option long term in the row for Tigers.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

BTW- anyone hear on commentary before the game, that Borthwick has analysts counting the number of times either side kick the ball, and if Tigers have been kicking less than the oppos, he gets the message out to kick more--- as those sides who kick more, tend to win. Or did I mishear?
FKAS
Posts: 8524
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by FKAS »

Banquo wrote:BTW- anyone hear on commentary before the game, that Borthwick has analysts counting the number of times either side kick the ball, and if Tigers have been kicking less than the oppos, he gets the message out to kick more--- as those sides who kick more, tend to win. Or did I mishear?
I doubt Borthwick operates on that level of simplicity. For a guy that apparently loves analytics and spends way more hours than anybody else at the club planning and dissecting training it sounds like an oversimplification of something he's noted. Given the commentators are Dayglo and Monye that would fit.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

FKAS wrote:
Banquo wrote:BTW- anyone hear on commentary before the game, that Borthwick has analysts counting the number of times either side kick the ball, and if Tigers have been kicking less than the oppos, he gets the message out to kick more--- as those sides who kick more, tend to win. Or did I mishear?
I doubt Borthwick operates on that level of simplicity. For a guy that apparently loves analytics and spends way more hours than anybody else at the club planning and dissecting training it sounds like an oversimplification of something he's noted. Given the commentators are Dayglo and Monye that would fit.
Think it was Danny Care tbh, but you are probably right- it sounded nuts/facile.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17793
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by Puja »

Managed to watch after playing yesterday (we won 102-7!) - Leicester were masters of our own downfall. Fair play to Saracens' defence who were excellent, but we didn't make them work very hard. Normally, it's IBWT, but I can't help thinking that starting with Montoya, Wiese, and Nadolo would've seen a different result - we spent too much time just banging our heads on the Sarries wall and having those three from the off would've allowed us to dent it and make space elsewhere. I don't subscribe to the theory that "we don't need the points" either - quite apart from the fact that our 12 point lead goes down to 7 if Saracens win their game in hand well, I don't see the advantage to providing confidence to a rival.

Also, how on earth did Ford not go off for an HIA when Davies was somehow not red carded? He was stuck full on the cheekbone by a fast-moving forehead - the whole point of the HIA protocol is that you cannot tell if someone's been concussed without doing it and that on-pitch assessments are about as much use as a chocolate fireguard.

Puja
Backist Monk
32nd Man
Posts: 130
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2022 10:02 am

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by 32nd Man »

Puja wrote:Managed to watch after playing yesterday (we won 102-7!) - Leicester were masters of our own downfall. Fair play to Saracens' defence who were excellent, but we didn't make them work very hard. Normally, it's IBWT, but I can't help thinking that starting with Montoya, Wiese, and Nadolo would've seen a different result - we spent too much time just banging our heads on the Sarries wall and having those three from the off would've allowed us to dent it and make space elsewhere. I don't subscribe to the theory that "we don't need the points" either - quite apart from the fact that our 12 point lead goes down to 7 if Saracens win their game in hand well, I don't see the advantage to providing confidence to a rival.

Also, how on earth did Ford not go off for an HIA when Davies was somehow not red carded? He was stuck full on the cheekbone by a fast-moving forehead - the whole point of the HIA protocol is that you cannot tell if someone's been concussed without doing it and that on-pitch assessments are about as much use as a chocolate fireguard.

Puja

There seems to be a culture developing and starting to gain influence that sees HIAs as an inconvenience and something to be avoided if you can.
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12208
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by Mikey Brown »

Yep, like many of these rules brought in before it seems the concern around head injuries seems to be loosening off just as it was starting to have a big impact. I hope the ridiculous situation in the Ireland/Italy game isn’t viewed as a reason to rally against red cards for high shots.

Did you see the clip of Francis stumbling all over the place in the England game? He didn’t have a clue where he was, and I’m not sure anything came of it. I feel like he’s had some recent issues too.
32nd Man
Posts: 130
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2022 10:02 am

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by 32nd Man »

The Francis one should see whoever the concussion medic watching was having to answer some serious questions to keep their job.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17793
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by Puja »

Mikey Brown wrote:Yep, like many of these rules brought in before it seems the concern around head injuries seems to be loosening off just as it was starting to have a big impact. I hope the ridiculous situation in the Ireland/Italy game isn’t viewed as a reason to rally against red cards for high shots.

Did you see the clip of Francis stumbling all over the place in the England game? He didn’t have a clue where he was, and I’m not sure anything came of it. I feel like he’s had some recent issues too.
I'm sure I read somewhere that the pressure group that Popham and Thompson are involved with are suing (or doing something) over that Francis incident. As 32nd Man says, someone should be losing their job there.

Puja
Backist Monk
Peej
Posts: 1756
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 12:01 pm

Re: Sarries Vs Tigers

Post by Peej »

The Davies yellow was a red all day long. The justification the commentators (Lol aside, tbf) tried to offer was ridiculous. And a lot of neck rolls went unpunished.
Post Reply