Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Moderator: Puja

User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14578
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Mellsblue »

“Odogwu carrying carpets…” :lol:
twitchy
Posts: 3294
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by twitchy »

I am watching bt and the co commentator (I can't even make out who it is) has the craziest sore throat voice. It is making me try and clear my own throat every time he tries to speak.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14578
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Mellsblue »

Saints are bloody good when they’re on song.

I chose ITV just for Flats and Nollie.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Adam_P »

That is a shit call to disallow that try. Especially in the context of Wasps non try
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14578
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Mellsblue »

Yep. 14 point swing with that call and the missed Umaga knock on.
switchskier
Posts: 2303
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by switchskier »

There must be another angle where that makes more sense. Commentators trying to justify it I feel
twitchy
Posts: 3294
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by twitchy »

Good try.
FKAS
Posts: 8524
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by FKAS »

twitchy wrote:I am watching bt and the co commentator (I can't even make out who it is) has the craziest sore throat voice. It is making me try and clear my own throat every time he tries to speak.
Think they've just said Tom May. Sounds like he's smoked a half dozen cigars last night on a serious bender.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Adam_P »

I think Coles did touch the ball there, but makes up for Umagas non try
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Adam_P »

Grayson's goal kicking hasn't been very good, but otherwise pretty happy with that game. Did feel at one point like we were on for a late loss like the last few games
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Banquo »

Made hard work of that tbh. TMO had a bit of a mare, but that’s a monkey off their backs in terms of not losing games they should be winning.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Adam_P »

Ribbans is back into some decent form the last few games, after quite a while of trying too hard and making lots of errors following his ban and missing out on England. Good to see.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Banquo »

Adam_P wrote:Ribbans is back into some decent form the last few games, after quite a while of trying too hard and making lots of errors following his ban and missing out on England. Good to see.
Yep, think he’d go well with Itoje.

Sleightholme is v rapid- hopefully he can put a run of games in. Mitchell was disappointing today- hit and miss; bit symptomatic of saints play…think it’s concentration as much as anything.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Adam_P »

Aye Sleights hasn't looked his best since coming back from injury, but yeah he is rapid and pretty physical too and a fair jackal for a winger. As you say, hopefully he can have a clear run to end the season and get back to form
Beasties
Posts: 1321
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Beasties »

Adam_P wrote:I think Coles did touch the ball there, but makes up for Umagas non try
Yup, you could see his fingers momentarily bend back on one frame then go straight again. No complaints though, Saints deserved the win
fivepointer
Posts: 5924
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by fivepointer »

Thought Ribbans was outstanding. Coles seems to be maturing nicely. T Willis very good for Wasps.

Both sides have a lot going for them, but neither can put together a consistent run.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Banquo »

fivepointer wrote:Thought Ribbans was outstanding. Coles seems to be maturing nicely. T Willis very good for Wasps.

Both sides have a lot going for them, but neither can put together a consistent run.
Yep, could do worse than call Ribbans up. Jack Willis was relatively subdued but that's not surprising- and did some of his normal stuff.
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Raggs »

Banquo wrote:
fivepointer wrote:Thought Ribbans was outstanding. Coles seems to be maturing nicely. T Willis very good for Wasps.

Both sides have a lot going for them, but neither can put together a consistent run.
Yep, could do worse than call Ribbans up. Jack Willis was relatively subdued but that's not surprising- and did some of his normal stuff.
According to the stats Jack and Tom had nearly identical stats, with Tom beating a couple more defenders (both with 16 tackles, Jack had 17 carries to Tom's 16). They had more carries between them than the rest of our starting pack.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Banquo »

Raggs wrote:
Banquo wrote:
fivepointer wrote:Thought Ribbans was outstanding. Coles seems to be maturing nicely. T Willis very good for Wasps.

Both sides have a lot going for them, but neither can put together a consistent run.
Yep, could do worse than call Ribbans up. Jack Willis was relatively subdued but that's not surprising- and did some of his normal stuff.
According to the stats Jack and Tom had nearly identical stats, with Tom beating a couple more defenders (both with 16 tackles, Jack had 17 carries to Tom's 16). They had more carries between them than the rest of our starting pack.
Yeah a- I knew you'd come up with something, so thanks, b- I'd paid compliments to the pair of them earlier, and c- it was a comment relative to his normal contribution, he understandably faded a bit and unsurprisingly wasn't coming up with his usual jackal rate...but still a very good performance.
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Raggs »

Banquo wrote:
Raggs wrote:
Banquo wrote: Yep, could do worse than call Ribbans up. Jack Willis was relatively subdued but that's not surprising- and did some of his normal stuff.
According to the stats Jack and Tom had nearly identical stats, with Tom beating a couple more defenders (both with 16 tackles, Jack had 17 carries to Tom's 16). They had more carries between them than the rest of our starting pack.
Yeah a- I knew you'd come up with something, so thanks, b- I'd paid compliments to the pair of them earlier, and c- it was a comment relative to his normal contribution, he understandably faded a bit and unsurprisingly wasn't coming up with his usual jackal rate...but still a very good performance.
Just didn't that was a relatively subdued appearance. No arguments about his jackaling. He went for a few more but didn't quite managed to get locked on them as well as the one he got. Saints were playing fast and loose, so not too many breakdowns anyway.
Banquo
Posts: 19278
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Northampton V Wasps Sun 3pm

Post by Banquo »

Raggs wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Raggs wrote:
According to the stats Jack and Tom had nearly identical stats, with Tom beating a couple more defenders (both with 16 tackles, Jack had 17 carries to Tom's 16). They had more carries between them than the rest of our starting pack.
Yeah a- I knew you'd come up with something, so thanks, b- I'd paid compliments to the pair of them earlier, and c- it was a comment relative to his normal contribution, he understandably faded a bit and unsurprisingly wasn't coming up with his usual jackal rate...but still a very good performance.
Just didn't that was a relatively subdued appearance. No arguments about his jackaling. He went for a few more but didn't quite managed to get locked on them as well as the one he got. Saints were playing fast and loose, so not too many breakdowns anyway.
Its a compliment to what his pre injury levels were tbh. Eddie suitably impressed :)
Post Reply