Bath Vs Saints

Moderator: Puja

FKAS
Posts: 8530
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Bath Vs Saints

Post by FKAS »

Bath Rugby team to play Northampton Saints:

15 Matt Gallagher, 14 Joe Cokanasiga, 13 Ollie Lawrence, 12 Cameron Redpath, 11 Will Butt, 10 George Worboys, 9 Louis Schreuder; 1 Juan Schoeman, 2 Tom Dunn (c), 3 Aranos Coetzee, 4 Dave Attwood, 5 Quinn Roux, 6 Josh Bayliss, 7 Miles Reid, 8 Richard de Carpentier

Replacements:

16 Niall Annett, 17 Arthur Cordwell, 18 D’Arcy Rae, 19 Fergus Lee-Warner, 20 Ted Hill, 21 Tom Carr-Smith, 22 Billy Searle, 23 Max Ojomoh

Northampton Saints team to play Bath Rugby:

15 George Furbank, 14 Tom Collins, 13 Matt Proctor, 12 Fraser Dingwall, 11 Ollie Sleightholme, 10 James Grayson, 9 Alex Mitchell; 1 Alex Waller, 2 Sam Matavesi, 3 Paul Hill, 4 Lukhan Salakaia-Loto, 5 David Ribbans, 6 Alex Coles, 7 Lewis Ludlam (c), 8 Juarno Augustus

Replacements:

16 Robbie Smith, 17 Emmanuel Iyogun, 18 Alfie Petch, 19 Alex Moon, 20 Sam Graham, 21 Tom James, 22 Tom Litchfield 23 George Hendy
fivepointer
Posts: 5925
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by fivepointer »

Bath improving. They've got a young 10 starting with Hill and Searle on the bench. Hendy, on the bench for Saints, looks a very promising youngster.
FKAS
Posts: 8530
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by FKAS »

The Bath Warriors are improving. Not sure they've got enough to get past Saints here but it should be interesting given Bath's love of a second half fightback and the Saints tendency to switch off for periods.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14579
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Mellsblue »

fivepointer wrote: Fri Oct 21, 2022 3:31 pm Bath improving. They've got a young 10 starting with Hill and Searle on the bench. Hendy, on the bench for Saints, looks a very promising youngster.
See Champ fred for some Hendy love.
Banquo
Posts: 19285
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Banquo »

Saints first side to lose to Bath, they won't be happy. Mind Bath have been improving and Saints a bit hit and miss.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Adam_P »

As we have most games this season so far - we created plenty and spent lots of time in the oppo red zone, but managed to fuck it up most of the time and leave without points
Banquo
Posts: 19285
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Banquo »

Adam_P wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 6:25 pm As we have most games this season so far - we created plenty and spent lots of time in the oppo red zone, but managed to fuck it up most of the time and leave without points
Yep it’s frustrating to watch. Dowson must be wondering what to do.
francoisfou
Posts: 2534
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:01 pm
Location: Haute-Garonne

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by francoisfou »

Ted Hill was impressive when he came in for the last 20. Maintain this form and he could well force himself into the 6N squad (I don’t think he’s in the AI squad?)
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 1987
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Spiffy »

The Redpath/Lawrence midfield combo seems to working well.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Adam_P »

francoisfou wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:50 pm Ted Hill was impressive when he came in for the last 20. Maintain this form and he could well force himself into the 6N squad (I don’t think he’s in the AI squad?)
Yeah he was good - tackled Moon back a fair way and he's not a small man
FKAS
Posts: 8530
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by FKAS »

Banquo wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:24 pm
Adam_P wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 6:25 pm As we have most games this season so far - we created plenty and spent lots of time in the oppo red zone, but managed to fuck it up most of the time and leave without points
Yep it’s frustrating to watch. Dowson must be wondering what to do.
Shore up the defence? Some of those tries were back to back poor errors but some of the defence was bad. Watching Redpath canter round Ludlum in the midfield is not really the type of line breaks a top four side would want to concede.

Didn't two of the tries come from turnovers 5m from the Bath line? Saints let them get down the field far to easily.

Saints backline does lack physicality. Freeman offers a bit of that and they are desperately missing his finishing capabilities.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Adam_P »

FKAS wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 9:54 pm
Banquo wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:24 pm
Adam_P wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 6:25 pm As we have most games this season so far - we created plenty and spent lots of time in the oppo red zone, but managed to fuck it up most of the time and leave without points
Yep it’s frustrating to watch. Dowson must be wondering what to do.
Saints backline does lack physicality.
Yep - this has pretty much been the case since Burrell left. Though he had his issues later on, in his prime he offered a real heavy carrying threat, that Downey offered before him. Now we have a backline almost entirely consisting of pretty much the same body type, when we could really use a heavy runner to fix some defenders to allow the likes of Hutchinson, Furbank, etc some space to exploit. Would absolutely kill for someone like Esterhuizen to add to our backline.
Banquo
Posts: 19285
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Banquo »

FKAS wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 9:54 pm
Banquo wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:24 pm
Adam_P wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 6:25 pm As we have most games this season so far - we created plenty and spent lots of time in the oppo red zone, but managed to fuck it up most of the time and leave without points
Yep it’s frustrating to watch. Dowson must be wondering what to do.
Shore up the defence? Some of those tries were back to back poor errors but some of the defence was bad. Watching Redpath canter round Ludlum in the midfield is not really the type of line breaks a top four side would want to concede.

Didn't two of the tries come from turnovers 5m from the Bath line? Saints let them get down the field far to easily.

Saints backline does lack physicality. Freeman offers a bit of that and they are desperately missing his finishing capabilities.
Defence is one part of it- I actually think it’s as much concentration. Proctor is pretty physical tbf, but I take your point, back three aren’t big at all. Think this is the first game Freeman has missed - don’t know what’s up with him tbh.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17795
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Puja »

Adam_P wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 10:44 pm
FKAS wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 9:54 pm
Banquo wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:24 pm

Yep it’s frustrating to watch. Dowson must be wondering what to do.
Saints backline does lack physicality.
Yep - this has pretty much been the case since Burrell left. Though he had his issues later on, in his prime he offered a real heavy carrying threat, that Downey offered before him. Now we have a backline almost entirely consisting of pretty much the same body type, when we could really use a heavy runner to fix some defenders to allow the likes of Hutchinson, Furbank, etc some space to exploit. Would absolutely kill for someone like Esterhuizen to add to our backline.
You really want to be getting in for Burger Odendaal from Wasps. He'd be a gane-changer for your lineup.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17795
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Puja »

Backist Monk
FKAS
Posts: 8530
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by FKAS »

Puja wrote: Sun Oct 23, 2022 12:11 am
Adam_P wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 10:44 pm
FKAS wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 9:54 pm

Saints backline does lack physicality.
Yep - this has pretty much been the case since Burrell left. Though he had his issues later on, in his prime he offered a real heavy carrying threat, that Downey offered before him. Now we have a backline almost entirely consisting of pretty much the same body type, when we could really use a heavy runner to fix some defenders to allow the likes of Hutchinson, Furbank, etc some space to exploit. Would absolutely kill for someone like Esterhuizen to add to our backline.
You really want to be getting in for Burger Odendaal from Wasps. He'd be a gane-changer for your lineup.

Puja
Or Olly Hartley but I still have hopes he'll settle slightly further North, just over the county border.

Someone to set the tone in the midfield with a couple of gain line stopping hits and to do the unflashy carrying, very much like Burrell and Downey used to, would help that Saints team. Particularly if they were a leader who could take control of the defensive line. Big Andre at Quins or van Rensburg at LI have done that for their clubs, Puja makes a good call with Odendaal who was looking like a good acquisition for Wasps.
Banquo
Posts: 19285
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Banquo »

Lots of pressies for Bath in there, who finished them off well.
Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Timbo »

Banquo wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 11:02 pm
FKAS wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 9:54 pm
Banquo wrote: Sat Oct 22, 2022 7:24 pm

Yep it’s frustrating to watch. Dowson must be wondering what to do.
Shore up the defence? Some of those tries were back to back poor errors but some of the defence was bad. Watching Redpath canter round Ludlum in the midfield is not really the type of line breaks a top four side would want to concede.

Didn't two of the tries come from turnovers 5m from the Bath line? Saints let them get down the field far to easily.

Saints backline does lack physicality. Freeman offers a bit of that and they are desperately missing his finishing capabilities.
Defence is one part of it- I actually think it’s as much concentration. Proctor is pretty physical tbf, but I take your point, back three aren’t big at all. Think this is the first game Freeman has missed - don’t know what’s up with him tbh.
Foot injury, not sure how bad.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Adam_P »

Quite how the TMO decided this was just a 'rugby incident' is beyond me - was pretty clear at the time.

User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9324
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Which Tyler »

From the angles shown at the time, it really wasn't obvious enough (the main angle, there's a Bath player in the way; from the second angle it's all on the other side of a ruck). All you could tell is that Attwood was moving his shoulders up and down in a pretty orthodox way for a player trying to remove someone from lying all over the ball. I'm sure other angles would have shown what actually happened, but we weren't shown those, and we typically get shown the angles the TMO sees.
The reverse angle did show though, that his bloody nose wasn't caused by Attwood (which absolutely doesn't mean that Attwood wasn't doing anything).
FKAS
Posts: 8530
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by FKAS »

I understand the frustration given Dingwall is as cynical as cynical can be (should have been sin binned that close to the line) but six weeks reduced for prior good behaviour is entirely fair for two strikes there. Attwood doing the decent thing and apologising directly to Dingwall after the game is always good to see.

Unsure how it wasn't reviewed on field given the movement of Attwood's shoulders there's something kicking off from the angle mainly blocked by the Bath player.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Adam_P »

Which Tyler wrote: Wed Oct 26, 2022 7:41 pm From the angles shown at the time, it really wasn't obvious enough
Obvious enough that it should have been formally reviewed and not brushed off.

User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17795
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Puja »

That's nasty - wasn't even accomplishing anything productive in terms of getting him to move, either.

There was one from Johnny Hill in the Exeter vs Sale match, where he just randomly bounced Roebuck's head against the floor for no apparent reason. Completely unnoticed by the TMO or the touch judge who was 2ft away.

Puja
Backist Monk
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12212
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Mikey Brown »

Puja wrote: Wed Oct 26, 2022 9:31 pm That's nasty - wasn't even accomplishing anything productive in terms of getting him to move, either.

There was one from Johnny Hill in the Exeter vs Sale match, where he just randomly bounced Roebuck's head against the floor for no apparent reason. Completely unnoticed by the TMO or the touch judge who was 2ft away.

Puja
Which team was he playing for?
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17795
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Bath Vs Saints

Post by Puja »

Mikey Brown wrote: Wed Oct 26, 2022 10:32 pm
Puja wrote: Wed Oct 26, 2022 9:31 pm That's nasty - wasn't even accomplishing anything productive in terms of getting him to move, either.

There was one from Johnny Hill in the Exeter vs Sale match, where he just randomly bounced Roebuck's head against the floor for no apparent reason. Completely unnoticed by the TMO or the touch judge who was 2ft away.

Puja
Which team was he playing for?
You've spotted my deliberate mistakes, I see.

My brain got very confused in typing that. I meant Sale vs Quins and, on looking back at the recording, I was wrong on just about every detail. It was Ross deciding to take a cheap shot and bounce Marcus Smiths head off the ground.

Sorry Jonny! Maligned you there.

Puja
Backist Monk
Post Reply