Didn't see the game so can't comment. You have just described a luxury that England cannot afford.fivepointer wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 5:04 pm Late tries put a gloss on the score but Quins were well beaten. Difficult for an attack to really function if you cant win the gain line battle.
Dombrandt is frustrating. He took his tries really well, put in a few nice touches but overall you feel his contribution doesnt match his ability.
Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
Moderator: Puja
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6417
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
Don’t think he is lazy just a centre trapped in an 8’s body. Personally I want an 8 who thrives on pain, one who puts winning the physical contest above off loading out of contact. And one who, whilst others ruffle hair with a sympathetic hand, gives a look of disgust.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 4:59 pmI suppose you’d need to look at his gps etc stats. I doubt he’d have got as far as test rugby if he’s lazy.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 4:57 pm I just think he’s lazy. So talented but just short on effort. He can do things that the other contenders can’t, but he also just disappears when he should stand up and stamp himself on the game.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14579
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
Agreed. He’s the wrong no8 for this England team, imo.Oakboy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 5:24 pmDidn't see the game so can't comment. You have just described a luxury that England cannot afford.fivepointer wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 5:04 pm Late tries put a gloss on the score but Quins were well beaten. Difficult for an attack to really function if you cant win the gain line battle.
Dombrandt is frustrating. He took his tries really well, put in a few nice touches but overall you feel his contribution doesnt match his ability.
- Stom
- Posts: 5846
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
His stats show a player far from lazy.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 4:59 pmI suppose you’d need to look at his gps etc stats. I doubt he’d have got as far as test rugby if he’s lazy.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 4:57 pm I just think he’s lazy. So talented but just short on effort. He can do things that the other contenders can’t, but he also just disappears when he should stand up and stamp himself on the game.
It’s a lazy accusation by lazy people looking for a lazy answer to a lazy question.
Lazy
-
- Posts: 3443
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
Stom wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 6:31 pmHis stats show a player far from lazy.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 4:59 pmI suppose you’d need to look at his gps etc stats. I doubt he’d have got as far as test rugby if he’s lazy.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 4:57 pm I just think he’s lazy. So talented but just short on effort. He can do things that the other contenders can’t, but he also just disappears when he should stand up and stamp himself on the game.
It’s a lazy accusation by lazy people looking for a lazy answer to a lazy question.
Lazy
No, he had a belting game……
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14579
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
That’s not very lazy-faire of you.Stom wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 6:31 pmHis stats show a player far from lazy.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 4:59 pmI suppose you’d need to look at his gps etc stats. I doubt he’d have got as far as test rugby if he’s lazy.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 4:57 pm I just think he’s lazy. So talented but just short on effort. He can do things that the other contenders can’t, but he also just disappears when he should stand up and stamp himself on the game.
It’s a lazy accusation by lazy people looking for a lazy answer to a lazy question.
Lazy
- Puja
- Posts: 17798
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
Thought Care's passing was atrocious - generally accurate, but it was so slow in the air.stepsider wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 4:39 pmEvery time Smith gets the ball there are three Stormers with it.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 4:37 pm Smith looks like he hasn’t got a clue how to unlock this defence. Mistakes a plenty from Quins. They’ve not adapted to the ref or the Stormers at all. They’ve been very poor.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 8532
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
He did the little step and then crap pass to Smith a fair bit as well. The step was always backwards so really invited that Stormers defence onto Smith.Puja wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 9:33 pmThought Care's passing was atrocious - generally accurate, but it was so slow in the air.stepsider wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 4:39 pmEvery time Smith gets the ball there are three Stormers with it.Epaminondas Pules wrote: ↑Sat Apr 01, 2023 4:37 pm Smith looks like he hasn’t got a clue how to unlock this defence. Mistakes a plenty from Quins. They’ve not adapted to the ref or the Stormers at all. They’ve been very poor.
Puja
-
- Posts: 12217
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
-
- Posts: 264
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2022 5:53 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
All?
-
- Posts: 1979
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
Marler again - what is wrong with this guy.
- Puja
- Posts: 17798
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 8532
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
Joe takes the threat of testicular cancer very seriously and was just helping out Fourie with a quick spot check.
-
- Posts: 12217
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
Am I failing to see something (anything at all) in that video?
I’ll hardly be shocked if Marler has another brain implosion and picks up another ban, but I can’t see anything there aside from the usual sort of ‘analytics’ going round after any game involving a South African team. A prop holds another prop for a moment after the ball has gone. Then a weird binding in a ruck, supposedly grabbing his balls (?), after which the player gets his head examined.
WTF is a make-your-own-arrangements pass?
I’ll hardly be shocked if Marler has another brain implosion and picks up another ban, but I can’t see anything there aside from the usual sort of ‘analytics’ going round after any game involving a South African team. A prop holds another prop for a moment after the ball has gone. Then a weird binding in a ruck, supposedly grabbing his balls (?), after which the player gets his head examined.
WTF is a make-your-own-arrangements pass?
- Puja
- Posts: 17798
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
Yeah, the first bit is nonsense complaining - it's the second bit I'm annoyed about. Marler has no need to be putting his hand there at all and it's frankly weird that he does. I'm assuming he's trying to distract the player from competing for the ball by putting his hand between his legs, but it's really, really weird that that would be his go-to action.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Wed Apr 05, 2023 2:39 pm Am I failing to see something (anything at all) in that video?
I’ll hardly be shocked if Marler has another brain implosion and picks up another ban, but I can’t see anything there aside from the usual sort of ‘analytics’ going round after any game involving a South African team. A prop holds another prop for a moment after the ball has gone. Then a weird binding in a ruck, supposedly grabbing his balls (?), after which the player gets his head examined.
WTF is a make-your-own-arrangements pass?
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 8532
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
Agreed, the first bit is actually clever play and it the Saffa commentator saw his team do that he'd be praising them. Little bit of street smarts to keep the Stormers front row from hitting those rucks which sees slower ball and a turnover. Clever bit of niggle that.
The second bit, as Puja says, that's just weird. A hand between the legs and then Fourie clearly taking exception to something isn't a good look for someone with Marler's priors. Fourie getting his head checked was pretty consistent for most the game, the guy was a gluten for punishment.
The second bit, as Puja says, that's just weird. A hand between the legs and then Fourie clearly taking exception to something isn't a good look for someone with Marler's priors. Fourie getting his head checked was pretty consistent for most the game, the guy was a gluten for punishment.
-
- Posts: 19291
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
- Spiffy
- Posts: 1987
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
No - in this case he was totally gluten-free.FKAS wrote: ↑Wed Apr 05, 2023 3:42 pm Agreed, the first bit is actually clever play and it the Saffa commentator saw his team do that he'd be praising them. Little bit of street smarts to keep the Stormers front row from hitting those rucks which sees slower ball and a turnover. Clever bit of niggle that.
The second bit, as Puja says, that's just weird. A hand between the legs and then Fourie clearly taking exception to something isn't a good look for someone with Marler's priors. Fourie getting his head checked was pretty consistent for most the game, the guy was a[glow=] gluten for punishment[glow=].
Don't know what strange psychology has a bloke go after another's genitals in public, especially with previous form.
I look forward to the day when some pissed-off opponent gives Marler a dose of his own medicine.
I remember a weird case of an Oz Rugby League player, probably 10+ years ago, who was done for repeatedly trying to shove his finger up the anus of tackled players.
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
Hopoate. 3 times one game. Wierd f*ck!
-
- Posts: 12217
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
Clearly you’ve all got much better eyesight than I do. I don’t know how you can have the slightest clue what’s going on from the angle in that video. Is there another angle?
I’d presume innocence, if based on only that video, if it were another player, but he does do some daft thing. Still there seems to be an awful lot of leaping done by those pundits. Is he actually quoting Fourie or just making stuff up?
I’d presume innocence, if based on only that video, if it were another player, but he does do some daft thing. Still there seems to be an awful lot of leaping done by those pundits. Is he actually quoting Fourie or just making stuff up?
- Puja
- Posts: 17798
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
I'm confused as to your confusion. You see him go to the guy bent over for the jackal, lean over him and put his hand between his legs as his first action, right? How is that something with an innocent explanation? What is he attempting to legally accomplish which starts with putting his hand there?Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Wed Apr 05, 2023 8:26 pm Clearly you’ve all got much better eyesight than I do. I don’t know how you can have the slightest clue what’s going on from the angle in that video. Is there another angle?
I’d presume innocence, if based on only that video, if it were another player, but he does do some daft thing. Still there seems to be an awful lot of leaping done by those pundits. Is he actually quoting Fourie or just making stuff up?
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 12217
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
I haven't got a clue. I just don't understand why you're all acting like there's any clear idea of what is happening there based on that video. Going for an unorthodox clearout? (where we do actually see that technique from time to time) He thinks Fourie has the ball? It's hard to rule out any specific strain of stupidity when it comes to Marler
I've lost track of the times partners of mine being forced to watch rugby have asked things like "Why is he sticking his head between that guy's legs? Why is he lifting that guy up in the air by his arse? Why did they all pretend to wank eachother off when that player scored?" etc. etc.
I've lost track of the times partners of mine being forced to watch rugby have asked things like "Why is he sticking his head between that guy's legs? Why is he lifting that guy up in the air by his arse? Why did they all pretend to wank eachother off when that player scored?" etc. etc.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14579
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Stormers v Quins Sat 3pm
A legitimate question.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Wed Apr 05, 2023 8:58 pm Why did they all pretend to wank each other off when that player scored?"