Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 18185
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by Puja »

Saracens: Goode; Cinti, Tompkins, Hartley, Maitland; Farrell, Davies; M Vunipola, George, Clarey, Itoje, McFarland, Gonzalez, Christie, B Vunipola.

Replacements: Dan, West, Mulipola, Tizard, Knight, Van Zyl, Parton, Lewington.

Connacht: Porch; Ralston, Farrell, Aki, Bolton; Carty, Blade; Duggan, Heffernan, Aungier, Murray, Thornbury, Prendergast, Oliver, Boyle.

Replacements: Tierney-Martin, Buckley, Bealham, Joyce, Butler, McDonald, Hanrahan, Kilgallen.
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 20891
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by Banquo »

good chance for Hartley.
FKAS
Posts: 7367
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by FKAS »

Yeah Aki will certainly provide a stern challenge.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16086
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by Mellsblue »

He’s one hull of player.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by Which Tyler »

He's going to score a boat-load now
User avatar
Mr Mwenda
Posts: 2537
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by Mr Mwenda »

Unless he gets pooped.
fivepointer
Posts: 6489
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by fivepointer »

He and his team in choppy waters at h/t
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 18185
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by Puja »

Farrell costing his team three points with an unnecessary scuffle after getting mildly provoked by a push. Not ideal.

Puja
Backist Monk
p/d
Posts: 4007
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by p/d »

Has Farrell‘a kicking gone to shit?
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5939
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by Stom »

p/d wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2023 3:04 pm Has Farrell‘a kicking gone to shit?
gone?
TheNomad
Posts: 772
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:19 am

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by TheNomad »

How did Hartley do? I saw one of the tries but not the be other
p/d
Posts: 4007
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by p/d »

Stom wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2023 6:16 pm
p/d wrote: Sat Dec 16, 2023 3:04 pm Has Farrell‘a kicking gone to shit?
gone?
I knew I had lined myself up for that!
Captainhaircut
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 5:32 pm

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by Captainhaircut »

People wonder why Farrell gets a tough ride and then you watch games like this. The media love in for dreadful to average performances just boils my piss.

- goalkicked liked a drain.
- gave away 3 points by being a petulant baby.
- spoke to the ref like a child as usual.
- threw an intercept for a try.
- threw the usual comical pass off his left hand because he can’t actually do it.

And all we heard was a massive overreaction to what was a nice pass for the Maitland try and some comical analysis of the Hartley try which totally ignored a brilliant kick from Tompkins and focused on how Farrell pointed at someone.

At the end the commentator said Farrell was confused that his usual reliable kicking had disappeared. Reality was that it was exactly the same as always- kicked the easy ones, missed anything slightly hard.

Whoever runs Farrell’s PR is a real genius for this Six Nations break. No one will ever say a bad word again (even though they barely did).
Scrumhead
Posts: 5973
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by Scrumhead »

I totally agree. However, given recent developments, I can only see the media making a deliberate effort to ‘be kind’.

Factual criticism will be glossed over and any positives will be fluffed up to the maximum.
Banquo
Posts: 20891
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by Banquo »

Captainhaircut wrote: Sun Dec 17, 2023 8:49 am
- goalkicked liked a drain.
- gave away 3 points by being a petulant baby.
- spoke to the ref like a child as usual.
- threw an intercept for a try.
- threw the usual comical pass off his left hand because he can’t actually do it.

...and rinse and repeat pretty much every match with the addition of poor tackling. Hiding in plain sight, emperor's new clothes etc etc
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12355
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by Mikey Brown »

Yes it’s the BT sport punditry team that should be getting abused online instead.
fivepointer
Posts: 6489
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Saracens vs Connacht - Sat 1pm

Post by fivepointer »

Captainhaircut wrote: Sun Dec 17, 2023 8:49 am People wonder why Farrell gets a tough ride and then you watch games like this. The media love in for dreadful to average performances just boils my piss.

- goalkicked liked a drain.
- gave away 3 points by being a petulant baby.
- spoke to the ref like a child as usual.
- threw an intercept for a try.
- threw the usual comical pass off his left hand because he can’t actually do it.

And all we heard was a massive overreaction to what was a nice pass for the Maitland try and some comical analysis of the Hartley try which totally ignored a brilliant kick from Tompkins and focused on how Farrell pointed at someone.

At the end the commentator said Farrell was confused that his usual reliable kicking had disappeared. Reality was that it was exactly the same as always- kicked the easy ones, missed anything slightly hard.

Whoever runs Farrell’s PR is a real genius for this Six Nations break. No one will ever say a bad word again (even though they barely did).
Well said. The commentators basically wet themselves over the pass for the Maitland try. It was a nice one tbf, but then the replacement SH put in a far better one a bit later which went by with barely a murmer.
And Farrell's goalkicking is now bang average - something so obvious that those super sharp TV pundits could maybe pick up on?
Post Reply