Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 18181
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by Puja »

Sale Sharks v La Rochelle
Sale Sharks: 15 Sam James, 14 Tom Roebuck, 13 Rob du Preez, 12 Sam Bedlow, 11 Arron Reed, 10 George Ford, 9 Gus Warr, 8 Josh Beaumont, 7 Ben Curry (c), 6 Sam Dugdale, 5 Jonny Hill, 4 Ben Bamber, 3 Nick Schonert, 2 Luke Cowan-Dickie, 1 Tumy Onasanya
Replacements: 16 Agustin Creevy, 17 Asher Opoku-Fordjour, 18 James Harper, 19 Tom Ellis, 20 Dan du Preez, 21 Nye Thomas, 22 Rekeiti Ma’asi-White, 23 Telusa Veainu

La Rochelle: 15 Brice Dulin, 14 Teddy Thomas, 13 UJ Seuteni, 12 Yoan Tanga, 11 Dillyn Leyds, 10 Antoine Hastoy, 9 Tawera Kerr-Barlow, 8 Gregory Alldritt (c), 7 Levani Botia, 6 Paul Boudehent, 5 Will Skelton, 4 Ultan Dillane, 3 Uini Atonio, 2 Quentin Lespiaucq, 1 Reda Wardi
Replacements: 16 Tolu Latu, 17 Joel Sclavi, 18 Aleksandre Kuntelia, 19 Thomas Lavault, 20 Judicael Cancoriet, 21 Thomas Berjon, 22 Hugo Reus 23 Jack Nowell

Venue: Salford Community Stadium
Kick-off: 13:00 GMT
Referee: Chris Busby (Ire)
Assistant Referees: Andrew Cole (Ire), Joy Neville (Ire)
TMO: Brian MacNeice (Ire)
Backist Monk
Banquo
Posts: 20889
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by Banquo »

Nowell still not switched to 7, he's running out of time
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16084
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote: Fri Jan 19, 2024 5:23 pm Nowell still not switched to 7, he's running out of time
Even if he’s running at full pace that’s still a long time…
Banquo
Posts: 20889
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote: Fri Jan 19, 2024 5:32 pm
Banquo wrote: Fri Jan 19, 2024 5:23 pm Nowell still not switched to 7, he's running out of time
Even if he’s running at full pace that’s still a long time…
LRZ will catch him
FKAS
Posts: 7361
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by FKAS »

Hill off injured, definitely a big blow for Sale and it didn't look good.

Sale 16-0 down at HT but the wind in their favour in the second half. La Rochelle have lost Dillane who calls their lineout so perhaps that is any area Sale can target in the second half.
p/d
Posts: 4006
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by p/d »

Du Preez has been pants
p/d
Posts: 4006
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by p/d »

Even Mells must be smitten by Kayser’s gloves
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16084
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by Mellsblue »

p/d wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 1:59 pm Du Preez has been pants
Yep, he’s been almost as bad as Sam James who is playing like a pound shop Steward, ie lumbering around but without the assuredness.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16084
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by Mellsblue »

p/d wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 2:01 pm Even Mells must be smitten by Kayser’s gloves
Kayser is a class act in every aspect. The only downside is that he and Flatman are my two favourite pundits (closely followed by Scarratt) and after years of watching the front five butcher the chances I created whilst proving all the most handsome, svelte, funny and erudite people play 10 at school - see Jamie George - this annoys me greatly, albeit not as much as Dallaglio and Monye.
16th man
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by 16th man »

First half looked like Sale could turn it around with the wind. 2nd half looking uncomfortably like France England from last year's 6 nations.
s
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16084
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by Mellsblue »

Nowell on. Cue a length of the field run burning all of Sale and RR EMB members.
16th man
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by 16th man »

Ref should be binning the LAR defender who just flopped on to kill that 2 metres out.

Then another advantage from the tap too.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16084
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by Mellsblue »

16th man wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 2:39 pm Ref should be binning the LAR defender who just flopped on to kill that 2 metres out.

Then another advantage from the tap too.
Tackler holding on was as big a culprit. Ref got there in the end with the team yellow but I feel like Sale are getting the run of the green with the decisions.
16th man
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by 16th man »

Mellsblue wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 2:42 pm
16th man wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 2:39 pm Ref should be binning the LAR defender who just flopped on to kill that 2 metres out.

Then another advantage from the tap too.
Tackler holding on was as big a culprit. Ref got there in the end with the team yellow but I feel like Sale are getting the run of the green with the decisions.
Make a change from the first half then.

Find it really annoying that anyone who sides steps is apparently fair game for a shot to the head now.
16th man
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by 16th man »

Oh and preventing a try with a high shot 5 metres out isn't a penalty try?
16th man
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by 16th man »

Gap in quality between the 2 squads is absolutely immense.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16084
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by Mellsblue »

Oh well. Ford with Farrellitis. Worth the gamble given the clock and scoreline, I’d argue.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16084
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by Mellsblue »

Class from Ford. I’ll be on his bandwagon until a couple of seasons after he’s retired.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16084
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by Mellsblue »

Mellsblue wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 2:20 pm Nowell on. Cue a length of the field run burning all of Sale and RR EMB members.
Time for another mea culpa. Nowell tried to sprint and fell over.
p/d
Posts: 4006
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by p/d »

Nye Thomas for England!!!
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16084
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by Mellsblue »

p/d wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 3:10 pm Nye Thomas for England!!!
He does look good. I watched him live vs Bedford and he was very impressive in most facets. He’s not just a nippy little bugger.
p/d
Posts: 4006
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by p/d »

Mellsblue wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 3:12 pm
p/d wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 3:10 pm Nye Thomas for England!!!
He does look good. I watched him live vs Bedford and he was very impressive in most facets. He’s not just a nippy little bugger.
Looks a classy lad, eye for a gap. Quick service and got himself some wheels!
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16084
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by Mellsblue »

p/d wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 3:32 pm
Mellsblue wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 3:12 pm
p/d wrote: Sun Jan 21, 2024 3:10 pm Nye Thomas for England!!!
He does look good. I watched him live vs Bedford and he was very impressive in most facets. He’s not just a nippy little bugger.
Looks a classy lad, eye for a gap. Quick service and got himself some wheels!
There’s no deNyeing it.
Banquo
Posts: 20889
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by Banquo »

Aneurin innit
fivepointer
Posts: 6488
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Sale vs La Rochelle - Sunday

Post by fivepointer »

Thomas did look sharp. First and foremost he has a terrific pass off either hand.

Thought Bamber put in a good 80 minute shift.

Sale gave themselves too much to do after LaR got 30 up. Good effort to get a try BP.
Post Reply