NZ v England round 1

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
FKAS
Posts: 8380
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by FKAS »

Stom wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:37 am There is such a huuuge gap in quality between Mitchell and Spencer.
You are under selling the gap in quality there.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5839
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Stom »

We’ve gone into our shell. Despite the missed kicks, I think Smith has been good, but now is the right time to bring on Fin. Marcus cannot play with Spencer. I don’t think anyone can play with Spencer, but we can’t bring him of now
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5839
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Stom »

Seriously, I don’t want Spencer in an England shirt. I said this last time he played, he’s just not good enough. Id much rather Randall
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5839
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Stom »

Too slow again.

Tbf, he played the ball on the floor
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9148
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Which Tyler »

Mellsblue wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:36 am True. I’m not comparing players just the situation. Beware the consequences of dropping a young flyhalf because his kicking has the yips. M. Smith’s kicking % was 85% coming in to the match.
Fair.
Again though, I've missed the calls for Marcus to be dropped because of his kicking (or dropped at all, for that matter)
FKAS
Posts: 8380
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by FKAS »

Stom wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:42 am Too slow again.

Tbf, he played the ball on the floor
Again the ref saying down by white. At which point as the 9 you dive into it to try and drag the ball out not flap your arms like you're trying achieve flight.
FKAS
Posts: 8380
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by FKAS »

ABs got the ref to set the scrum height higher there and then their tighthead goes right through Baxter with Dan and Cole suddenly scrumming against the whole AB front row on their own. Ouch.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Mellsblue »

Which Tyler wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:43 am
Mellsblue wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:36 am True. I’m not comparing players just the situation. Beware the consequences of dropping a young flyhalf because his kicking has the yips. M. Smith’s kicking % was 85% coming in to the match.
Fair.
Again though, I've missed the calls for Marcus to be dropped because of his kicking (or dropped at all, for that matter)
No one has explicitly but I’m thinking of long term selection. I’m in the Andy Flower school of making a selection and backing them (for one game too many). There’s repercussions beyond today if you pull a player for performance reasons.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5839
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Stom »

Mellsblue wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:49 am
Which Tyler wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:43 am
Mellsblue wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:36 am True. I’m not comparing players just the situation. Beware the consequences of dropping a young flyhalf because his kicking has the yips. M. Smith’s kicking % was 85% coming in to the match.
Fair.
Again though, I've missed the calls for Marcus to be dropped because of his kicking (or dropped at all, for that matter)
No one has explicitly but I’m thinking of long term selection. I’m in the Andy Flower school of making a selection and backing them (for one game too many). There’s repercussions beyond today if you pull a player for performance reasons.
Except Spencer. He needs to be pulled and never seen again
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9148
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Which Tyler »

Okay, so we're discussing a hypothetical situation that isn't happening, or being discussed, as being a bad thing.
Sorry, I'd thought it was a live discussion about actual things, and that I'd just failed to see part of it.

Then I agree, Marcus shouldn't be dropped for his kicking performance in the second half. As, it appears, does everybody.
astralweeks
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:33 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by astralweeks »

Cock
astralweeks
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:33 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by astralweeks »

Cock
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5839
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Stom »

Honestly, we’ve been crap for 23 minutes. I wonder what happened on 57 minutes.

Honestly, if we had a different 9 on the bench, we’d have won that.

We played well generally, made some poor mistakes, were done by some cheating at the scrum that was not dealt with.


We need one change to the 23 for next week, dropping Spencer.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1695
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Adam_P »

If Marcus kicked some easy goals we'd have won that
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Mellsblue »

Which Tyler wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:52 am Okay, so we're discussing a hypothetical situation that isn't happening, or being discussed, as being a bad thing.
Sorry, I'd thought it was a live discussion about actual things, and that I'd just failed to see part of it.

Then I agree, Marcus shouldn't be dropped for his kicking performance in the second half. As, it appears, does everybody.
People were asking for M Smith to be pulled because of his goal kicking and I was merely highlighting the possible long term repercussions of such a decision by referencing a similar situation that ultimately led to Farrell stinking up the midfield for years.
As I said, repercussions in the long term. Long term selection involves hypotheticals.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Mellsblue »

Yep, change 10 and 21 and we win that. Simples!
LongForgotten
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:40 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by LongForgotten »

Appreciate it's not just the 9 who determines ruck speed but Spencer seemed to be very slow even when the ball was available.

Feels like an opportunity missed but still feel more positive about England now than I have since 2019.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6366
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Oakboy »

Fin and Spencer kicked away our chances. Earlier, why did the captain not give the kicking tee to Slade? Was CCS injured? A huge gap in carrying when he departed.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9148
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Which Tyler »

Mellsblue wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:59 amPeople were asking for M Smith to be pulled because of his goal kicking
Then I've missed those posts (and made it clear repeatedly that I hadn't seen them).

Closest I've seen is Adam's after our conversation

Interestingly, when I asked who had called for it, you even said that nobody had
Last edited by Which Tyler on Sat Jul 06, 2024 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17675
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Puja »

Adam_P wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:59 am If Marcus kicked some easy goals we'd have won that
The one that he missed led directly to our try, so it's not that simple.

Ben Spencer is awful. Has never met a bit of possession that he doesn't want to slow down and aimlessly box-kick away. That's what cost us the match today.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Mellsblue »

Which Tyler wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 10:01 am
Mellsblue wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:59 amPeople were asking for M Smith to be pulled because of his goal kicking
Then I've missed those posts (and made it clear repeatedly that I hadn't seen them).

Closest I've seen is Adam's after our conversation

Interestingly, when I asked who had called for it, you even said that nobody had
I said nobody had called for him to be dropped not that nobody had called for him to be subbed.
I’ll leave it here.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6366
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Oakboy »

Puja wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 10:01 am
Adam_P wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:59 am If Marcus kicked some easy goals we'd have won that
The one that he missed led directly to our try, so it's not that simple.

Ben Spencer is awful. Has never met a bit of possession that he doesn't want to slow down and aimlessly box-kick away. That's what cost us the match today.

Puja
Agreed but Fin Smith looked like he had forgotten that passing is allowed as well.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9148
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Which Tyler »

Ah, sorry, cross-communication on that.
I still didn't see the call, but that's fine.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Mellsblue »

The most annoying thing about this morning is that the country bumpkin Kiwi is the best dressed bloke in the studio.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5839
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Stom »

Oakboy wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 10:06 am
Puja wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 10:01 am
Adam_P wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:59 am If Marcus kicked some easy goals we'd have won that
The one that he missed led directly to our try, so it's not that simple.

Ben Spencer is awful. Has never met a bit of possession that he doesn't want to slow down and aimlessly box-kick away. That's what cost us the match today.

Puja
Agreed but Fin Smith looked like he had forgotten that passing is allowed as well.
I thought his kicking was good.
Post Reply