You are under selling the gap in quality there.
NZ v England round 1
Moderator: Puja
- Stom
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
We’ve gone into our shell. Despite the missed kicks, I think Smith has been good, but now is the right time to bring on Fin. Marcus cannot play with Spencer. I don’t think anyone can play with Spencer, but we can’t bring him of now
- Stom
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
Seriously, I don’t want Spencer in an England shirt. I said this last time he played, he’s just not good enough. Id much rather Randall
- Stom
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
Too slow again.
Tbf, he played the ball on the floor
Tbf, he played the ball on the floor
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9148
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: NZ v England round 1
Fair.
Again though, I've missed the calls for Marcus to be dropped because of his kicking (or dropped at all, for that matter)
-
- Posts: 8380
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
-
- Posts: 8380
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
ABs got the ref to set the scrum height higher there and then their tighthead goes right through Baxter with Dan and Cole suddenly scrumming against the whole AB front row on their own. Ouch.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
No one has explicitly but I’m thinking of long term selection. I’m in the Andy Flower school of making a selection and backing them (for one game too many). There’s repercussions beyond today if you pull a player for performance reasons.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:43 amFair.
Again though, I've missed the calls for Marcus to be dropped because of his kicking (or dropped at all, for that matter)
- Stom
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
Except Spencer. He needs to be pulled and never seen againMellsblue wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:49 amNo one has explicitly but I’m thinking of long term selection. I’m in the Andy Flower school of making a selection and backing them (for one game too many). There’s repercussions beyond today if you pull a player for performance reasons.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:43 amFair.
Again though, I've missed the calls for Marcus to be dropped because of his kicking (or dropped at all, for that matter)
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9148
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: NZ v England round 1
Okay, so we're discussing a hypothetical situation that isn't happening, or being discussed, as being a bad thing.
Sorry, I'd thought it was a live discussion about actual things, and that I'd just failed to see part of it.
Then I agree, Marcus shouldn't be dropped for his kicking performance in the second half. As, it appears, does everybody.
Sorry, I'd thought it was a live discussion about actual things, and that I'd just failed to see part of it.
Then I agree, Marcus shouldn't be dropped for his kicking performance in the second half. As, it appears, does everybody.
- Stom
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
Honestly, we’ve been crap for 23 minutes. I wonder what happened on 57 minutes.
Honestly, if we had a different 9 on the bench, we’d have won that.
We played well generally, made some poor mistakes, were done by some cheating at the scrum that was not dealt with.
We need one change to the 23 for next week, dropping Spencer.
Honestly, if we had a different 9 on the bench, we’d have won that.
We played well generally, made some poor mistakes, were done by some cheating at the scrum that was not dealt with.
We need one change to the 23 for next week, dropping Spencer.
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
If Marcus kicked some easy goals we'd have won that
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
People were asking for M Smith to be pulled because of his goal kicking and I was merely highlighting the possible long term repercussions of such a decision by referencing a similar situation that ultimately led to Farrell stinking up the midfield for years.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 9:52 am Okay, so we're discussing a hypothetical situation that isn't happening, or being discussed, as being a bad thing.
Sorry, I'd thought it was a live discussion about actual things, and that I'd just failed to see part of it.
Then I agree, Marcus shouldn't be dropped for his kicking performance in the second half. As, it appears, does everybody.
As I said, repercussions in the long term. Long term selection involves hypotheticals.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
Yep, change 10 and 21 and we win that. Simples!
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2023 10:40 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
Appreciate it's not just the 9 who determines ruck speed but Spencer seemed to be very slow even when the ball was available.
Feels like an opportunity missed but still feel more positive about England now than I have since 2019.
Feels like an opportunity missed but still feel more positive about England now than I have since 2019.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6366
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
Fin and Spencer kicked away our chances. Earlier, why did the captain not give the kicking tee to Slade? Was CCS injured? A huge gap in carrying when he departed.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9148
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: NZ v England round 1
Then I've missed those posts (and made it clear repeatedly that I hadn't seen them).
Closest I've seen is Adam's after our conversation
Interestingly, when I asked who had called for it, you even said that nobody had
Last edited by Which Tyler on Sat Jul 06, 2024 10:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Puja
- Posts: 17675
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
The one that he missed led directly to our try, so it's not that simple.
Ben Spencer is awful. Has never met a bit of possession that he doesn't want to slow down and aimlessly box-kick away. That's what cost us the match today.
Puja
Backist Monk
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
I said nobody had called for him to be dropped not that nobody had called for him to be subbed.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 10:01 amThen I've missed those posts (and made it clear repeatedly that I hadn't seen them).
Closest I've seen is Adam's after our conversation
Interestingly, when I asked who had called for it, you even said that nobody had
I’ll leave it here.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6366
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
Agreed but Fin Smith looked like he had forgotten that passing is allowed as well.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9148
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: NZ v England round 1
Ah, sorry, cross-communication on that.
I still didn't see the call, but that's fine.
I still didn't see the call, but that's fine.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
The most annoying thing about this morning is that the country bumpkin Kiwi is the best dressed bloke in the studio.
- Stom
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
I thought his kicking was good.Oakboy wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 10:06 amAgreed but Fin Smith looked like he had forgotten that passing is allowed as well.