NZ v England round 1
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
Smith kicks easy goals, very different game. Bench, esp Spencer took us backwards. Earl was poor at the breadkown.
Lot of positives, our defence stood up scrambling but miss that number of first up tackles again....
Lot of positives, our defence stood up scrambling but miss that number of first up tackles again....
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6366
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
Unfortunately, competitive back row options are few - Ben Curry and Dombrandt are the others available. Would you risk either v NZ? I'd have taken Tom Willis ahead of both and he would make a good bench option at this point. From those in the squad, I'd pick Roots for the 20 shirt. I think I'd also pick Isiekwe ahead of Coles if only as a potential 6 if that becomes necessary. None of the squad options are that convincing.
-
- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
CCS going off a double whammy- carrying and lineout. Coles is a very good lock but a very average 6. Back 5 forward subbing was poor unless CCS crocked.
We wasted chances first half, and were poor the last 20 although shutting the ABs down easily enough.
We wasted chances first half, and were poor the last 20 although shutting the ABs down easily enough.
-
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 5:32 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
Genge, chessum, Langdon and JVP on the bench would have made a big difference. As would Ford starting.
-
- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
Only JVP and Langdon were available and I don’t think Langdon is better than Dan tbhCaptainhaircut wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:26 pm Genge, chessum, Langdon and JVP on the bench would have made a big difference. As would Ford starting.
- Puja
- Posts: 17668
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
Watching the Aus vs Wales game is heartening. Two bald men fighting over a comb compared to our match.
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 8379
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
Fixed that for you.
I actually think Coles has more potential at 6 at international level than he does at lock. He's mobile and can run good lines in attack. Around the tight exchanges he lacks physicality, the particularly dumb no arms tackle right in front of the posts that helped lose us the game was about the only thing of note he did today.
-
- Posts: 8379
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
If there is one thing we can all agree on it’s that it sucks to be Welsh.
And they’re currently very bad at rugby.
And they’re currently very bad at rugby.
-
- Posts: 308
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 5:32 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
This wasn’t a criticism of selection. More a commentary on unavailable players. I don’t think Langdon was available (went off in prem final) and likely they decided full pre season for JVP was better.Banquo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:29 pmOnly JVP and Langdon were available and I don’t think Langdon is better than Dan tbhCaptainhaircut wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:26 pm Genge, chessum, Langdon and JVP on the bench would have made a big difference. As would Ford starting.
For me, Langdon is an improvement on Dan. Dan has great potential but he doesn’t have anywhere near the experience required to understand how to utilise his skillset. If I had to guess, I’d say he’s made less than 20 professional starts in his entire career.
-
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
The mullets on view in both games remains a source of entertainment
Last edited by p/d on Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9145
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: NZ v England round 1
Felt like the subs came on and played to secure an existing lead, without noticing that NZ were leading.
Underhill off cost us, and to my eyes, didn't look more tired than Earl, whilst Spencer and FSmith seemed to want to add control at the expense of speed and invention (and not particularly succeed at adding the control).
Underhill off cost us, and to my eyes, didn't look more tired than Earl, whilst Spencer and FSmith seemed to want to add control at the expense of speed and invention (and not particularly succeed at adding the control).
-
- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
That penalty was timed out?, and I totally disagree about him being a better 6.FKAS wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:34 pmFixed that for you.
I actually think Coles has more potential at 6 at international level than he does at lock. He's mobile and can run good lines in attack. Around the tight exchanges he lacks physicality, the particularly dumb no arms tackle right in front of the posts that helped lose us the game was about the only thing of note he did today.
Last edited by Banquo on Sat Jul 06, 2024 2:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Stom
- Posts: 5839
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
Fin had to come on at that point, as Marcus was just unable to deal with Spencer at all. Which is pretty poor… you’d think it’s something the coaching team would pick up on in training.
I agree that the changes on the flank were poor. I also think that, while Earl has shown up really well at 8 in general…he is prone to a mistake. A fit curry has such an upside that Slutty Badger just wants him to play, even if that means getting CCS off…
Should have been Earl making way, imo. The flanks did well.
One big mitigating factor was the experience on the kiwi bench. We do lack a little fit experience right now. I’d also like to see replacements for both centers, still. I just don’t trust them
I agree that the changes on the flank were poor. I also think that, while Earl has shown up really well at 8 in general…he is prone to a mistake. A fit curry has such an upside that Slutty Badger just wants him to play, even if that means getting CCS off…
Should have been Earl making way, imo. The flanks did well.
One big mitigating factor was the experience on the kiwi bench. We do lack a little fit experience right now. I’d also like to see replacements for both centers, still. I just don’t trust them
-
- Posts: 12134
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
Meaningless now but did anybody catch JB’s clearout on Smith immediately after the Perenara neck roll? Looked very suspicious and they managed to not show it while replaying TJP’s clearout.
Agreed that the subs generally sucked.
I feel for Coles. It hasn’t come together for him on any of his England appearances so far, but I just don’t know if he’s a 6. Is give him another shot (as a lock) ahead of Isiekwe.
Curry should have stayed at home, or just been there to monitor his fitness. The backrow at the end was weird.
Agreed that the subs generally sucked.
I feel for Coles. It hasn’t come together for him on any of his England appearances so far, but I just don’t know if he’s a 6. Is give him another shot (as a lock) ahead of Isiekwe.
Curry should have stayed at home, or just been there to monitor his fitness. The backrow at the end was weird.
-
- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
May be right on langdon injury, but the way he was manhandled in the big european games put him down the rankings for me.Captainhaircut wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:53 pmThis wasn’t a criticism of selection. More a commentary on unavailable players. I don’t think Langdon was available (went off in prem final) and likely they decided full pre season for JVP was better.Banquo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:29 pmOnly JVP and Langdon were available and I don’t think Langdon is better than Dan tbhCaptainhaircut wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:26 pm Genge, chessum, Langdon and JVP on the bench would have made a big difference. As would Ford starting.
For me, Langdon is an improvement on Dan. Dan has great potential but he doesn’t have anywhere near the experience required to understand how to utilise his skillset. If I had to guess, I’d say he’s made less than 20 professional starts in his entire career.
-
- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
The two are linked imoMikey Brown wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:50 pm
I feel for Coles. It hasn’t come together for him on any of his England appearances so far, but I just don’t know if he’s a 6.
The backrow at the end was weird.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6366
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
Agreed. It's hard to understand how it was either missed by all four officials or seen and ignored. On a single real-time viewing I thought yellow bordering on red. Perhaps there was no actual head contact when viewed in slo-mo but it was reckless at best. Then again it was a NZ player in NZ so different laws apply.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:50 pm Meaningless now but did anybody catch JB’s clearout on Smith immediately after the Perenara neck roll? Looked very suspicious and they managed to not show it while replaying TJP’s clearout.

- Oakboy
- Posts: 6366
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: NZ v England round 1
How good is Coles anyway? It's hard to judge in amongst club stuff, injury absences and the odd few international minutes here and there. Reservations are reasonable based on him being a replacement bench option for Ewels!!! That's not exactly a high bar.Banquo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:55 pmThe two are linked imoMikey Brown wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:50 pm
I feel for Coles. It hasn’t come together for him on any of his England appearances so far, but I just don’t know if he’s a 6.
The backrow at the end was weird.
-
- Posts: 8379
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
Now I know Banquo is insistent he's not a 6, he probably isn't a convincing one yet but I think it could be his best route at international level. Maybe even Saints thinking it's his future at club level. One lock (Moon) and two backrows (Lawes, Ludlam) out but two locks in (Hunter-Hill and Smith) but only one backrow (Kemeny) in. Could see more of Coles at 6, could not. We'll see.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:50 pm I feel for Coles. It hasn’t come together for him on any of his England appearances so far, but I just don’t know if he’s a 6. Is give him another shot (as a lock) ahead of Isiekwe.
Problem for Coles is that Martin and Itoje are substantially better players and able to play for 80mins. Come the Autumn Ollie Chessum returns who's comfortably better at lock and a handy option at 6. I'm not sure Coles will get many chances to get game time at lock outside of next summer's Lions Tour.
On paper the backrow at the end also sort of made sense but didn't quite work. Big and mobile hybrid at 6, natural openside at 7 and the starting 8.
-
- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
Coles can also go 80 if that helps, his engine and mobility are notable strengths as a lock. I agree though, that he's fourth choice lock at best, ignoring left/right considerations.FKAS wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 2:13 pmNow I know Banquo is insistent he's not a 6, he probably isn't a convincing one yet but I think it could be his best route at international level. Maybe even Saints thinking it's his future at club level. One lock (Moon) and two backrows (Lawes, Ludlam) out but two locks in (Hunter-Hill and Smith) but only one backrow (Kemeny) in. Could see more of Coles at 6, could not. We'll see.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:50 pm I feel for Coles. It hasn’t come together for him on any of his England appearances so far, but I just don’t know if he’s a 6. Is give him another shot (as a lock) ahead of Isiekwe.
Problem for Coles is that Martin and Itoje are substantially better players and able to play for 80mins. Come the Autumn Ollie Chessum returns who's comfortably better at lock and a handy option at 6. I'm not sure Coles will get many chances to get game time at lock outside of next summer's Lions Tour.
On paper the backrow at the end also sort of made sense but didn't quite work. Big and mobile hybrid at 6, natural openside at 7 and the starting 8.
It didn`t work because as before, Coles struggles at 6 at this level (and not much time there this season), Curry clearly ring rusty, and Earls looking a bit shagged out and inaccurate. Breadown (and scrum) under pressure all game.
-
- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
Impressve lock at club level, as is ewels...but is different gravy to the other locks. Prob the best come lineout, but not as hard nosed as he needs to be...bit lightweight despite putting on timber.Oakboy wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 2:10 pmHow good is Coles anyway? It's hard to judge in amongst club stuff, injury absences and the odd few international minutes here and there. Reservations are reasonable based on him being a replacement bench option for Ewels!!! That's not exactly a high bar.Banquo wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:55 pmThe two are linked imoMikey Brown wrote: ↑Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:50 pm
I feel for Coles. It hasn’t come together for him on any of his England appearances so far, but I just don’t know if he’s a 6.
The backrow at the end was weird.
-
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: NZ v England round 1
Left Hill at home. Big mistake
-
- Posts: 19123
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm