NZ v England round 1

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Banquo
Posts: 19122
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Banquo »

Smith kicks easy goals, very different game. Bench, esp Spencer took us backwards. Earl was poor at the breadkown.
Lot of positives, our defence stood up scrambling but miss that number of first up tackles again....
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6366
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Oakboy »

Unfortunately, competitive back row options are few - Ben Curry and Dombrandt are the others available. Would you risk either v NZ? I'd have taken Tom Willis ahead of both and he would make a good bench option at this point. From those in the squad, I'd pick Roots for the 20 shirt. I think I'd also pick Isiekwe ahead of Coles if only as a potential 6 if that becomes necessary. None of the squad options are that convincing.
Banquo
Posts: 19122
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Banquo »

CCS going off a double whammy- carrying and lineout. Coles is a very good lock but a very average 6. Back 5 forward subbing was poor unless CCS crocked.

We wasted chances first half, and were poor the last 20 although shutting the ABs down easily enough.
Captainhaircut
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 5:32 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Captainhaircut »

Genge, chessum, Langdon and JVP on the bench would have made a big difference. As would Ford starting.
Banquo
Posts: 19122
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Banquo »

Captainhaircut wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:26 pm Genge, chessum, Langdon and JVP on the bench would have made a big difference. As would Ford starting.
Only JVP and Langdon were available and I don’t think Langdon is better than Dan tbh
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17664
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Puja »

Watching the Aus vs Wales game is heartening. Two bald men fighting over a comb compared to our match.

Puja
Backist Monk
FKAS
Posts: 8376
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by FKAS »

Banquo wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:22 pm CCS going off a double whammy- carrying and lineout. Coles is an average lock but a very average 6 at test level.
Fixed that for you.

I actually think Coles has more potential at 6 at international level than he does at lock. He's mobile and can run good lines in attack. Around the tight exchanges he lacks physicality, the particularly dumb no arms tackle right in front of the posts that helped lose us the game was about the only thing of note he did today.
FKAS
Posts: 8376
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by FKAS »

Puja wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:31 pm Watching the Aus vs Wales game is heartening. Two bald men fighting over a comb compared to our match.

Puja
Very much so. Watching Tom Wright casually wander through the Wales defence there, that wasn't happening this morning.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Mellsblue »

If there is one thing we can all agree on it’s that it sucks to be Welsh.




















And they’re currently very bad at rugby.
Captainhaircut
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 5:32 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Captainhaircut »

Banquo wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:29 pm
Captainhaircut wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:26 pm Genge, chessum, Langdon and JVP on the bench would have made a big difference. As would Ford starting.
Only JVP and Langdon were available and I don’t think Langdon is better than Dan tbh
This wasn’t a criticism of selection. More a commentary on unavailable players. I don’t think Langdon was available (went off in prem final) and likely they decided full pre season for JVP was better.

For me, Langdon is an improvement on Dan. Dan has great potential but he doesn’t have anywhere near the experience required to understand how to utilise his skillset. If I had to guess, I’d say he’s made less than 20 professional starts in his entire career.
p/d
Posts: 3826
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by p/d »

Mellsblue wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:51 pm If there is one thing we can all agree on it’s that it sucks to be Welsh.




















And they’re currently very bad at rugby.
The mullets on view in both games remains a source of entertainment
Last edited by p/d on Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9144
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Which Tyler »

Felt like the subs came on and played to secure an existing lead, without noticing that NZ were leading.
Underhill off cost us, and to my eyes, didn't look more tired than Earl, whilst Spencer and FSmith seemed to want to add control at the expense of speed and invention (and not particularly succeed at adding the control).
Banquo
Posts: 19122
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Banquo »

FKAS wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:34 pm
Banquo wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:22 pm CCS going off a double whammy- carrying and lineout. Coles is an average lock but a very average 6 at test level.
Fixed that for you.

I actually think Coles has more potential at 6 at international level than he does at lock. He's mobile and can run good lines in attack. Around the tight exchanges he lacks physicality, the particularly dumb no arms tackle right in front of the posts that helped lose us the game was about the only thing of note he did today.
That penalty was timed out?, and I totally disagree about him being a better 6.
Last edited by Banquo on Sat Jul 06, 2024 2:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5839
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Stom »

Fin had to come on at that point, as Marcus was just unable to deal with Spencer at all. Which is pretty poor… you’d think it’s something the coaching team would pick up on in training.

I agree that the changes on the flank were poor. I also think that, while Earl has shown up really well at 8 in general…he is prone to a mistake. A fit curry has such an upside that Slutty Badger just wants him to play, even if that means getting CCS off…

Should have been Earl making way, imo. The flanks did well.


One big mitigating factor was the experience on the kiwi bench. We do lack a little fit experience right now. I’d also like to see replacements for both centers, still. I just don’t trust them
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12133
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Mikey Brown »

Meaningless now but did anybody catch JB’s clearout on Smith immediately after the Perenara neck roll? Looked very suspicious and they managed to not show it while replaying TJP’s clearout.

Agreed that the subs generally sucked.

I feel for Coles. It hasn’t come together for him on any of his England appearances so far, but I just don’t know if he’s a 6. Is give him another shot (as a lock) ahead of Isiekwe.

Curry should have stayed at home, or just been there to monitor his fitness. The backrow at the end was weird.
Banquo
Posts: 19122
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Banquo »

Captainhaircut wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:53 pm
Banquo wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:29 pm
Captainhaircut wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 12:26 pm Genge, chessum, Langdon and JVP on the bench would have made a big difference. As would Ford starting.
Only JVP and Langdon were available and I don’t think Langdon is better than Dan tbh
This wasn’t a criticism of selection. More a commentary on unavailable players. I don’t think Langdon was available (went off in prem final) and likely they decided full pre season for JVP was better.

For me, Langdon is an improvement on Dan. Dan has great potential but he doesn’t have anywhere near the experience required to understand how to utilise his skillset. If I had to guess, I’d say he’s made less than 20 professional starts in his entire career.
May be right on langdon injury, but the way he was manhandled in the big european games put him down the rankings for me.
Banquo
Posts: 19122
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Banquo »

Mikey Brown wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:50 pm
I feel for Coles. It hasn’t come together for him on any of his England appearances so far, but I just don’t know if he’s a 6.

The backrow at the end was weird.
The two are linked imo
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6366
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Oakboy »

Mikey Brown wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:50 pm Meaningless now but did anybody catch JB’s clearout on Smith immediately after the Perenara neck roll? Looked very suspicious and they managed to not show it while replaying TJP’s clearout.

Agreed. It's hard to understand how it was either missed by all four officials or seen and ignored. On a single real-time viewing I thought yellow bordering on red. Perhaps there was no actual head contact when viewed in slo-mo but it was reckless at best. Then again it was a NZ player in NZ so different laws apply. :?
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6366
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Oakboy »

Banquo wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:55 pm
Mikey Brown wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:50 pm
I feel for Coles. It hasn’t come together for him on any of his England appearances so far, but I just don’t know if he’s a 6.

The backrow at the end was weird.
The two are linked imo
How good is Coles anyway? It's hard to judge in amongst club stuff, injury absences and the odd few international minutes here and there. Reservations are reasonable based on him being a replacement bench option for Ewels!!! That's not exactly a high bar.
FKAS
Posts: 8376
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by FKAS »

Mikey Brown wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:50 pm I feel for Coles. It hasn’t come together for him on any of his England appearances so far, but I just don’t know if he’s a 6. Is give him another shot (as a lock) ahead of Isiekwe.
Now I know Banquo is insistent he's not a 6, he probably isn't a convincing one yet but I think it could be his best route at international level. Maybe even Saints thinking it's his future at club level. One lock (Moon) and two backrows (Lawes, Ludlam) out but two locks in (Hunter-Hill and Smith) but only one backrow (Kemeny) in. Could see more of Coles at 6, could not. We'll see.

Problem for Coles is that Martin and Itoje are substantially better players and able to play for 80mins. Come the Autumn Ollie Chessum returns who's comfortably better at lock and a handy option at 6. I'm not sure Coles will get many chances to get game time at lock outside of next summer's Lions Tour.

On paper the backrow at the end also sort of made sense but didn't quite work. Big and mobile hybrid at 6, natural openside at 7 and the starting 8.
Banquo
Posts: 19122
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Banquo »

FKAS wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 2:13 pm
Mikey Brown wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:50 pm I feel for Coles. It hasn’t come together for him on any of his England appearances so far, but I just don’t know if he’s a 6. Is give him another shot (as a lock) ahead of Isiekwe.
Now I know Banquo is insistent he's not a 6, he probably isn't a convincing one yet but I think it could be his best route at international level. Maybe even Saints thinking it's his future at club level. One lock (Moon) and two backrows (Lawes, Ludlam) out but two locks in (Hunter-Hill and Smith) but only one backrow (Kemeny) in. Could see more of Coles at 6, could not. We'll see.

Problem for Coles is that Martin and Itoje are substantially better players and able to play for 80mins. Come the Autumn Ollie Chessum returns who's comfortably better at lock and a handy option at 6. I'm not sure Coles will get many chances to get game time at lock outside of next summer's Lions Tour.

On paper the backrow at the end also sort of made sense but didn't quite work. Big and mobile hybrid at 6, natural openside at 7 and the starting 8.
Coles can also go 80 if that helps, his engine and mobility are notable strengths as a lock. I agree though, that he's fourth choice lock at best, ignoring left/right considerations.

It didn`t work because as before, Coles struggles at 6 at this level (and not much time there this season), Curry clearly ring rusty, and Earls looking a bit shagged out and inaccurate. Breadown (and scrum) under pressure all game.
Banquo
Posts: 19122
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 2:10 pm
Banquo wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:55 pm
Mikey Brown wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 1:50 pm
I feel for Coles. It hasn’t come together for him on any of his England appearances so far, but I just don’t know if he’s a 6.

The backrow at the end was weird.
The two are linked imo
How good is Coles anyway? It's hard to judge in amongst club stuff, injury absences and the odd few international minutes here and there. Reservations are reasonable based on him being a replacement bench option for Ewels!!! That's not exactly a high bar.
Impressve lock at club level, as is ewels...but is different gravy to the other locks. Prob the best come lineout, but not as hard nosed as he needs to be...bit lightweight despite putting on timber.
p/d
Posts: 3826
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by p/d »

Left Hill at home. Big mistake
Banquo
Posts: 19122
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by Banquo »

p/d wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 2:46 pm Left Hill at home. Big mistake
Ted, Jonny or Jimmy?
p/d
Posts: 3826
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: NZ v England round 1

Post by p/d »

Banquo wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 3:05 pm
p/d wrote: Sat Jul 06, 2024 2:46 pm Left Hill at home. Big mistake
Ted, Jonny or Jimmy?
The chinster
Post Reply