Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Moderator: Puja
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9136
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Ref: Anthony Woodthorpe
TJs: Daniel Jones & Calum Howard
TMO: Stuart Terheege
Northampton:
1 Tom West
2 Curtis Langdon
3 Trevor Davison
4 Temo Mayanavanua
5 Alex Coles
6 Josh Kemeny
7 Tom Pearson
8 Juarno Augustus
09 Alex Mitchell
10 Fin Smith
11 James Ramm
12 Rory Hutchinson
13 Fraser Dingwall
14 Tommy Freeman
15 George Hendy
16 Henry Walker, 17 Tarek Haffar, 18 Luke Green, 19 Tom Lockett, 20 Henry Pollock, 21 Angus Scott-Young
22 Archie McParland, 23 Ollie Sleightholme
Bath:
1 Beno Obano
2 Tom Dunn
3 Will Stuart
4 Quinn Roux
5 Ross Molony
6 Guy Pepper
7 Miles Reid
8 Alfie Barbeary
09 Ben Spencer
10 Finn Russell
11 Will Muir
12 Max Ojomoh
13 Ollie Lawrence
14 Joe Cokanasiga
15 Orlando Bailey
16 Kepu Tuipulotu, 17 Francois van Wyk, 18 Thomas du Toit, 19 Charlie Ewels, 20 Sam Underhill, 22 Josh Bayliss, 23 Jaco Coetzee
21 Louis Schreuder
TJs: Daniel Jones & Calum Howard
TMO: Stuart Terheege
Northampton:
1 Tom West
2 Curtis Langdon
3 Trevor Davison
4 Temo Mayanavanua
5 Alex Coles
6 Josh Kemeny
7 Tom Pearson
8 Juarno Augustus
09 Alex Mitchell
10 Fin Smith
11 James Ramm
12 Rory Hutchinson
13 Fraser Dingwall
14 Tommy Freeman
15 George Hendy
16 Henry Walker, 17 Tarek Haffar, 18 Luke Green, 19 Tom Lockett, 20 Henry Pollock, 21 Angus Scott-Young
22 Archie McParland, 23 Ollie Sleightholme
Bath:
1 Beno Obano
2 Tom Dunn
3 Will Stuart
4 Quinn Roux
5 Ross Molony
6 Guy Pepper
7 Miles Reid
8 Alfie Barbeary
09 Ben Spencer
10 Finn Russell
11 Will Muir
12 Max Ojomoh
13 Ollie Lawrence
14 Joe Cokanasiga
15 Orlando Bailey
16 Kepu Tuipulotu, 17 Francois van Wyk, 18 Thomas du Toit, 19 Charlie Ewels, 20 Sam Underhill, 22 Josh Bayliss, 23 Jaco Coetzee
21 Louis Schreuder
-
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
7/1 bench?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9136
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 12119
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Are they struggling for fit backs? Is Bayliss maybe actually the wing cover?
-
- Posts: 8362
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
He's probably quicker than Louis Schreuder. Not the game to have a lack of fit backs though. Will Vesty tweak his attacking tactics? Maybe try and get the Bath backline running a lot in the first half knowing they've all got to play the full 80 mins and Saints have the back division to make tired tackles costly.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 1:18 pm Are they struggling for fit backs? Is Bayliss maybe actually the wing cover?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9136
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Nope, deliberate choice by JvGMikey Brown wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 1:18 pm Are they struggling for fit backs? Is Bayliss maybe actually the wing cover?

-
- Posts: 8362
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Which Tyler wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 1:33 pmNope, deliberate choice by JvGMikey Brown wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 1:18 pm Are they struggling for fit backs? Is Bayliss maybe actually the wing cover?![]()

Got to love those crazy South African head coaches.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9136
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
It's the Bath Bomb squad - sponsored by Lush
- jngf
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Is Guy Pepper better at 6 or 7 btw?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9136
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
In my eyes, he's a 7; but I don't think it really matters these days, it's about the backrow as a whole covering all the things you want from a backrow.
Choice between 6 and 7 seems to be "who do I want pressuring their 10" rather than anything to do with tackling, linking, carrying etc.
Pepper at 6 certainly isn't the problem with this selection.
-
- Posts: 19093
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
where's the popcorn ?
-
- Posts: 3390
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Another school leaver in line for Prem debut!
-
- Posts: 5975
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Same. Feels a bit more like an SA numbering convention though with Reid the more natural 6 and Pepper the natural 7 just with the numbers swapped.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Fri Jan 03, 2025 2:56 pmIn my eyes, he's a 7; but I don't think it really matters these days, it's about the backrow as a whole covering all the things you want from a backrow.
Choice between 6 and 7 seems to be "who do I want pressuring their 10" rather than anything to do with tackling, linking, carrying etc.
Pepper at 6 certainly isn't the problem with this selection.
7:1 is very high risk but a big sign of confidence from Bath and as @Mikey Brown mentioned, Bayliss has the gas/dexterity to play a version of the Kwagga Smith role.
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Sleightholme replaced on the bench by Seabrook
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Lovely stuff from Fin Smith and Mitchell for the 2nd try
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Well this isn't going how I thought it would, 3 tries for Saints in 13 mins
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9136
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
3 back rowers on the bench, one of whom is expecting to spend some time on the wing.
A starting backrower picks up an injury in the opening 10 minutes.
Replace him with your wing cover
Genius
A starting backrower picks up an injury in the opening 10 minutes.
Replace him with your wing cover
Genius
-
- Posts: 304
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 5:32 pm
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Think they wanted the lineout option.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 3:18 pm 3 back rowers on the bench, one of whom is expecting to spend some time on the wing.
A starting backrower picks up an injury in the opening 10 minutes.
Replace him with your wing cover
Genius
-
- Posts: 3279
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Fantastic game.
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Yeah I was expecting Underhill on for Pepper
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9136
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
A] Saints racking up the defensive penalties.
B] how the hell did Bailey get through there?
B] how the hell did Bailey get through there?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9136
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
I think it's just "we've game planned this to not use and backfield replacements, and well play it out as if we won't use any backfield replacements"
Bayliss for Pepper is fine.
It's doing that early, with a 7:1 bench that is too risky (mins, the 7:1 is too risky regardless)
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
And now Muir is injured...
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1693
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
Fin Smith absolutely melting Reid, embarrassing for the flanker
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9136
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Northampton v Bath; Sunday, 3.00
And the insanity is confirmed