I think the benefits to some players of a summer off and a proper pre-season leading to recovering club form and being available for the AIs outweigh the tour results. Don't forget that just about every Lions tour leads to serious injuries so we will probably be missing important players for the AIs.Captainhaircut wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 1:18 pmWe don’t care about actually trying to win in Argentina then? I’ll give you the USA but this Argentina team are excellent and winning 2-0 there whilst missing our lions would be an incredible achievement and statement. Considering the lions who will be missing, leaving Martin, Underhill and IFW at home (plus anyone else) as some have suggested would make a really tough assignment even harder.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Mar 18, 2025 12:31 pmYup, those 3 need more time in an England shirt.Scrumhead wrote: ↑Mon Mar 17, 2025 9:33 pm Yeah. Same here. CCS, Curry and Willis for me.
I’m only leaving Underhill at home because I feel like we’d benefit more from giving the game time for Ben Curry, Pollock and/or Kenningham/Pepper. I feel a bit bad writing that because he always seems to get the hard end of those decisions despite being consistently excellent when he does play. If Ben Curry does go with the Lions, Underhill should 100% be the starting 7.
Underhill needs a full pre-season; and neither he nor anyone else would learn anything by playing against Argentina & USA
The other factor is that the tour's main benefit is giving fringe players chances that they don't get in non-Lions years. In RWC-cycle terms this is more or less their last shot.