Saints vs Sarries

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3390
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Saints vs Sarries

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

NORTHAMPTON SAINTS vs SARACENS
Gallagher Premiership, Round 17
Saturday 17 May, 2025
cinch Stadium at Franklin’s Gardens
Kick-off: 3.05pm

15 James Ramm
14 Tommy Freeman
13 Fraser Dingwall (c)
12 Rory Hutchinson
11 Tom Litchfield
10 Fin Smith
9 Alex Mitchell

1 Emmanuel Iyogun
2 Curtis Langdon
3 Trevor Davison – 50th Saints appearance
4 Temo Mayanavanua
5 Tom Lockett
6 Alex Coles
7 Josh Kemeny
8 Henry Pollock

Replacements:
16 Craig Wright
17 Tarek Haffar
18 Elliot Millar Mills
19 Ed Prowse
20 Angus Scott-Young
21 Jonny Weimann
22 Jake Garside
23 Tom Seabrook


Saracens Men team to play Northampton Saints:

1 Eroni Mawi
2 Jamie George
3 Marco Riccioni
4 Maro Itoje (c)
5 Nick Isiekwe
6 Juan Martin Gonzalez
7 Ben Earl
8 Tom Willis
9 Ivan van Zyl
10 Fergus Burke
11 Rotimi Segun
12 Nick Tompkins
13 Elliot Daly
14 Tobias Elliott
15 Alex Goode

Replacements:

16 Theo Dan
17 Phil Brantingham
18 Alec Clarey
19 Hugh Tizard
20 Theo McFarland
21 Andy Onyeama-Christie
22 Charlie Bracken
23 Angus Hall
Epaminondas Pules
Posts: 3390
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by Epaminondas Pules »

Brantingham back!
FKAS
Posts: 8360
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by FKAS »

Saints side still looking beset with injuries then. Hopefully they get a few back before the final.
Banquo
Posts: 19092
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by Banquo »

More time for Maro- obviously needs the miles in his legs!!
fivepointer
Posts: 5890
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by fivepointer »

He'll almost certainly play the full 80 too.

Utterly ridiculous and inexcusable that he wasnt stood down last week.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1692
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by Adam_P »

This is going to be a nervous watch. If Smith or Mitchell pick up an injury we can kiss goodbye to the final next weekend.

Augustus being on the injured list is far from ideal - hopefully nothing serious. James is a HIA so hopefully will be available next week.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1692
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by Adam_P »

Langdon off with what seemed to be a stinger, Ramm off with a more concerning looking lower limb injury, Pollock looked uncomfortable on his hip towards the end of the half and Mayanavanua seemed to have a knee/ankle issue. Excellent. We really can't afford to lose any of them, especially Ramm.

Fin Smith needs to stop carrying too - protect yourself boy!
Captainhaircut
Posts: 302
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 5:32 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by Captainhaircut »

Sarries have clearly come with a plan to be hugely aggressive, particularly at the breakdown, knowing that Saints will be a bit down on physicality with next week pending.
paddy no 11
Posts: 1933
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 10:34 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by paddy no 11 »

That's a yellow card for a tackle in the air, Pearce thinks it's relevant that dingwell tried to make a pass wtf
fivepointer
Posts: 5890
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by fivepointer »

paddy no 11 wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 4:50 pm That's a yellow card for a tackle in the air, Pearce thinks it's relevant that dingwell tried to make a pass wtf
That was an inexplicably bad decision. Having decided it was foul play, the obvious conclusion was that a penalty try should have been awarded.

The officials gave one back to Saints with the final play being waved on despite what looked like a very obvious forward pass in the build up.

Saints will be mightily relieved to have got the win but they took a right old battering.
FKAS
Posts: 8360
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by FKAS »

fivepointer wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 5:09 pm
paddy no 11 wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 4:50 pm That's a yellow card for a tackle in the air, Pearce thinks it's relevant that dingwell tried to make a pass wtf
That was an inexplicably bad decision. Having decided it was foul play, the obvious conclusion was that a penalty try should have been awarded.

The officials gave one back to Saints with the final play being waved on despite what looked like a very obvious forward pass in the build up.

Saints will be mightily relieved to have got the win but they took a right old battering.
Yeah agreed. Was a penalty try for the Goode tackle in the air. The player throws it back inside because he's being tackled into touch (illegally).
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1692
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by Adam_P »

Yeah very odd explanation that the offload which was almost definitely initiated because of the tackle was the reason not to award the pen try.

The forward pass in the final try was also weird in that it looked more forward from the rearward camera angle than it did the in line one.

Good to get the win to build a bit of momentum into next week, but we really need the Ramm and Langdon injuries to be minor knocks. Horrible injury list in the back 3, and although Wright is quality at hooker there's a fair drop down to Walker.

That was probably the quietest game I've seen Pollock involved in so far.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1692
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by Adam_P »

Augustus confirmed unavailable for next weekend, Coles also a doubt. Joy.

This has been a dreadful season for injuries
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17645
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by Puja »

Adam_P wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 6:08 pm Yeah very odd explanation that the offload which was almost definitely initiated because of the tackle was the reason not to award the pen try.
Quite apart from anything else, isn't there a rule with deciding a penalty try where the player committing the illegal action gets treated like they weren't on the pitch? There was one a while back with a player deliberately slapping a ball touch in goal when he could potentially have grounded it, and the penalty try was given because the likelihood of a try is based around "if the illegal act didn't happen", not "if the illegal act didn't happen **and** he did something else instead."

Plus, I think Saints could've got a pen try earlier when Seabrook nearly scored - the ball gets knocked from his hands, as he picks it up, in a tackle by Van Zyl, who is currently lying on the ground at the point he goes for the bsll.

But it does balance out, as that was very definitely a forward pass for the last once, so we got there in the end.

Good result for England and the Lions that - giving the hope that Sarries won't qualify and Maro will actually get to rest for a couple of weeks.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6361
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by Oakboy »

Adam_P wrote: Sat May 17, 2025 6:08 pm Yeah very odd explanation that the offload which was almost definitely initiated because of the tackle was the reason not to award the pen try.

The forward pass in the final try was also weird in that it looked more forward from the rearward camera angle than it did the in line one.

Good to get the win to build a bit of momentum into next week, but we really need the Ramm and Langdon injuries to be minor knocks. Horrible injury list in the back 3, and although Wright is quality at hooker there's a fair drop down to Walker.

That was probably the quietest game I've seen Pollock involved in so far.
Poor Pollock can't please everyone. When he does something flashy, his ability to do the nitty-gritty is questioned. When he has a hard-grafting, effective game he had a quiet one. The commentator said he was over-shadowed by Earl and co - bollix, IMO. I thought he did exactly what was required of a No 8 in the circumstances of that game, indicating a far more advanced level of rugby intelligence and team ethic than he gets credit for.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1692
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by Adam_P »

I wasn't being critical of Pollock, just notable that it was different from his normal performance.

He'll almost definitely be doing his thing from 8 again against Bordeaux. With Augustus definitely out and Coles apparently in a knee brace and on crutches post match our backrow will probably consist of Scott-Young, Pollock and Kemeny.
fivepointer
Posts: 5890
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Saints vs Sarries

Post by fivepointer »

Adam_P wrote: Sun May 18, 2025 1:29 pm I wasn't being critical of Pollock, just notable that it was different from his normal performance.

He'll almost definitely be doing his thing from 8 again against Bordeaux. With Augustus definitely out and Coles apparently in a knee brace and on crutches post match our backrow will probably consist of Scott-Young, Pollock and Kemeny.
Pollock was quiet. He cant do a 5 star turn every game and its OK if his opponents play better as the Saracens back row did for much of the game.

Coles injury could have ramifications for England as well as Saints.
Post Reply