Random Funny Images

Post Reply
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by BBD »

Image
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by BBD »

Image
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by BBD »

Image
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by BBD »

Image
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by BBD »

Image
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by BBD »

Image
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by BBD »

Image
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by BBD »

Image
User avatar
BBD
Site Admin
Posts: 1860
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:37 am

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by BBD »

Image
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12001
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by Mikey Brown »

BBD wrote:Image
I want cassette boy to mock up Trumpt saying those exact words.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by rowan »

Image
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
Buggaluggs
Posts: 1265
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by Buggaluggs »

rowan wrote:Image
At fucking last. Something funny.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by rowan »

Image
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
belgarion
Posts: 299
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:25 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by belgarion »

rowan wrote:Image
And back to form
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent
Mikey Brown
Posts: 12001
Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by Mikey Brown »

I don't quite get why this thread has become a target for you, Rowan? I don't beleive for a second you actually laugh at any of these. A thread of political/satirical wouldn't be an awful idea, though if you genuinely believe the rhetoric of these posts then surely they're not funny, they're quite depressing?
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7847
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by morepork »

It's like watching the world's worst political cartoonist try and save a career using Google images.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by rowan »

If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
Stones of granite
Posts: 1642
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by Stones of granite »

rowan wrote:
Must be an old clip, back heels are now a knock-on.
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 4048
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by Lizard »

Stones of granite wrote:
rowan wrote:
Must be an old clip, back heels are now a knock-on.
Under which Law?
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
User avatar
Stones of granite
Posts: 1642
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by Stones of granite »

Lizard wrote:
Stones of granite wrote:
rowan wrote:
Must be an old clip, back heels are now a knock-on.
Under which Law?
It's an odd one. It doesn't come under a specific law, but in the definitions.

Kick: A kick is made by hitting the ball with any part of the leg or foot, except the heel,
from the toe to the knee but not including the knee; a kick must move the ball a visible
distance out of the hand, or along the ground.


I can't remember exactly when it was changed, but it was a fair few years ago now.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by rowan »

Stones of granite wrote:
Lizard wrote:
Stones of granite wrote:
Must be an old clip, back heels are now a knock-on.
Under which Law?
It's an odd one. It doesn't come under a specific law, but in the definitions.

Kick: A kick is made by hitting the ball with any part of the leg or foot, except the heel,
from the toe to the knee but not including the knee; a kick must move the ball a visible
distance out of the hand, or along the ground.


I can't remember exactly when it was changed, but it was a fair few years ago now.
Didn't Carlos Spencer get penalized several times in a game once (v SA??) for kneeing the ball forward as a tactic to get beyond a particularly flat defence? The referee in that game adjudged it a knock-on or lost forward or something.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
onlynameleft
Posts: 271
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 12:23 pm

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by onlynameleft »

rowan wrote:
Stones of granite wrote:
Lizard wrote: Under which Law?
It's an odd one. It doesn't come under a specific law, but in the definitions.

Kick: A kick is made by hitting the ball with any part of the leg or foot, except the heel,
from the toe to the knee but not including the knee; a kick must move the ball a visible
distance out of the hand, or along the ground.


I can't remember exactly when it was changed, but it was a fair few years ago now.
Didn't Carlos Spencer get penalized several times in a game once (v SA??) for kneeing the ball forward as a tactic to get beyond a particularly flat defence? The referee in that game adjudged it a knock-on or lost forward or something.
Paul Turner used to do that. Can't remember him getting pinged for it.
User avatar
Stones of granite
Posts: 1642
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by Stones of granite »

rowan wrote:
Stones of granite wrote:
Lizard wrote: Under which Law?
It's an odd one. It doesn't come under a specific law, but in the definitions.

Kick: A kick is made by hitting the ball with any part of the leg or foot, except the heel,
from the toe to the knee but not including the knee; a kick must move the ball a visible
distance out of the hand, or along the ground.


I can't remember exactly when it was changed, but it was a fair few years ago now.
Didn't Carlos Spencer get penalized several times in a game once (v SA??) for kneeing the ball forward as a tactic to get beyond a particularly flat defence? The referee in that game adjudged it a knock-on or lost forward or something.
I don't remember that, but it's possible. Kneeing the ball for a quick penalty was quite fashionable for a while, and I think I was still playing when the change in the definition took effect, so that would make it before 2008.

Edit: Just found a 2003 edition of the laws, and the definition of the Kick is the same, so it goes back further than I thought.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7756
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by rowan »

Stones of granite wrote:
rowan wrote:
Stones of granite wrote: It's an odd one. It doesn't come under a specific law, but in the definitions.

Kick: A kick is made by hitting the ball with any part of the leg or foot, except the heel,
from the toe to the knee but not including the knee; a kick must move the ball a visible
distance out of the hand, or along the ground.


I can't remember exactly when it was changed, but it was a fair few years ago now.
Didn't Carlos Spencer get penalized several times in a game once (v SA??) for kneeing the ball forward as a tactic to get beyond a particularly flat defence? The referee in that game adjudged it a knock-on or lost forward or something.
I don't remember that, but it's possible. Kneeing the ball for a quick penalty was quite fashionable for a while, and I think I was still playing when the change in the definition took effect, so that would make it before 2008.

Edit: Just found a 2003 edition of the laws, and the definition of the Kick is the same, so it goes back further than I thought.
I think I was still in NZ at the time, so we're probably talking late 90s. As I recall the consensus was the ref had got it right, though it had seemed a little pedantic.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
Stones of granite
Posts: 1642
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Random Funny Images

Post by Stones of granite »

rowan wrote:
Stones of granite wrote:
rowan wrote:
Didn't Carlos Spencer get penalized several times in a game once (v SA??) for kneeing the ball forward as a tactic to get beyond a particularly flat defence? The referee in that game adjudged it a knock-on or lost forward or something.
I don't remember that, but it's possible. Kneeing the ball for a quick penalty was quite fashionable for a while, and I think I was still playing when the change in the definition took effect, so that would make it before 2008.

Edit: Just found a 2003 edition of the laws, and the definition of the Kick is the same, so it goes back further than I thought.
I think I was still in NZ at the time, so we're probably talking late 90s. As I recall the consensus was the ref had got it right, though it had seemed a little pedantic.
Think you're right. Late 90s. I was definitely back in Scotland, so after 96. No idea why it was changed.
Post Reply