Team for Georgia
Moderator: OptimisticJock
-
- Posts: 2303
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
Much better from Georgia this half. Looks like their scrum half signed for Bruce this year but has only played once for them.
-
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
Good scrum. Laidlaw if you're going to toe poke that you're as well blootering it.
-
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
Now they are off Dell and Fagerson can reflect on a a very good AI series.
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
Ali price soon?
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: Team for Georgia
Should have been on 5min ago imo.Adder wrote:Ali price soon?
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 2303
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
Vern will want one more score I reckon. Georgia benefiting from not kicking so much.Adder wrote:Ali price soon?
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 1803
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
Laidlaw not doing too baddly mind
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: Team for Georgia
We're >3 tries up. There's no excuse now.switchskier wrote:Vern will want one more score I reckon. Georgia benefiting from not kicking so much.Adder wrote:Ali price soon?
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: Team for Georgia
He isn't to be fair. But neither were the others who were subbed. This is perfect for Price to come on.Adder wrote:Laidlaw not doing too baddly mind
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
Has he just yellowed Low for being pumped? There's no logical reason for him to wheel that.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
Can't argue with that. We've not had a response to the Georgian scrum.
-
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
Nice pace and work by price and Hughes.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
That my friends is exactly why we have got to move on from Laidlaw. Well done Mr Price. I don't remember the last time Laidlaw took a quick tap.
-
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
Shame to see us move the game to rugby park and not sell it out. Not the easiest to get to.
-
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
Good all round performance.
-
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
BTW in the England game the RG boy has a big ban coming.
Edit. Clear stamp in the puss. Deliberate too for my money.
Edit. Clear stamp in the puss. Deliberate too for my money.
- hp18
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 6:34 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
He took a quite tap in the first half.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:That my friends is exactly why we have got to move on from Laidlaw. Well done Mr Price. I don't remember the last time Laidlaw took a quick tap.
The Coo is dead. Long live The Coo.
-
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: Team for Georgia
I though that too. Price or any 9 needs more gametime but an10min cameo in a comfortable win shouldn't be read into too much.hp18 wrote:He took a quite tap in the first half.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:That my friends is exactly why we have got to move on from Laidlaw. Well done Mr Price. I don't remember the last time Laidlaw took a quick tap.
-
- Posts: 2303
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:10 pm
Re: RE: Re: Team for Georgia
I thought that Russell's missed conversion said more about why Laidlaw plays. Price also slowed things down a bit thereafter.Big D wrote:I though that too. Price or any 9 needs more gametime but an10min cameo in a comfortable win shouldn't be read into too much.hp18 wrote:He took a quite tap in the first half.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:That my friends is exactly why we have got to move on from Laidlaw. Well done Mr Price. I don't remember the last time Laidlaw took a quick tap.
-
- Posts: 5596
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:49 pm
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Team for Georgia
Again, in that situation it isn't a fair comparison either. That was Russells to 1st kick in the match after 70odd min. And Price was closing a game out.switchskier wrote:I thought that Russell's missed conversion said more about why Laidlaw plays. Price also slowed things down a bit thereafter.Big D wrote:I though that too. Price or any 9 needs more gametime but an10min cameo in a comfortable win shouldn't be read into too much.hp18 wrote: He took a quite tap in the first half.
We can't use that 10min for any real evaluation of how a post Laidlaw team would look nor can we use it as evidence to move on from him IMO.
Price now needs to try and move in front of Pyrgos at weeg.
- Edinburgh in Exile
- Posts: 928
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:52 am
Re: Team for Georgia
I was wondering if I had imagined that.hp18 wrote:He took a quite tap in the first half.hugh_woatmeigh wrote:That my friends is exactly why we have got to move on from Laidlaw. Well done Mr Price. I don't remember the last time Laidlaw took a quick tap.
And aye, as D is saying it's not a fair comparison at all. I highly doubt he would have made that tap and go had he been on for the full game. Still, like the look of that cat at this level.
Solid win, stuffy second half, but the defence held up alright. I'm glad we started how we did (after the clusterfuck of a try we conceded that is), as my fears about the scrum kind of got realised for most of the second half, but by then it didn't really matter.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Team for Georgia
Next season maybe... Glasgow don't have many first choices. Most are rotated.Big D wrote:Again, in that situation it isn't a fair comparison either. That was Russells to 1st kick in the match after 70odd min. And Price was closing a game out.switchskier wrote:I thought that Russell's missed conversion said more about why Laidlaw plays. Price also slowed things down a bit thereafter.Big D wrote: I though that too. Price or any 9 needs more gametime but an10min cameo in a comfortable win shouldn't be read into too much.
We can't use that 10min for any real evaluation of how a post Laidlaw team would look nor can we use it as evidence to move on from him IMO.
Price now needs to try and move in front of Pyrgos at weeg.
-
- Posts: 693
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 10:26 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
Enjoyed that. Good first half: accurate, solid set piece and finished off a few meat pies. Our kicking game was miles better than theirs and helped us to dominate territory and possession.
Where TF did the Ross Ford of the first half come from? Looked good. Wilson too and Hogg obviously
We knew our third choice props were weak. Confirmed again. Dickinson and Nel back in and our pack looks handy.
It was good to see Georgia play a bit second half. Their 9 is class.
Where TF did the Ross Ford of the first half come from? Looked good. Wilson too and Hogg obviously
We knew our third choice props were weak. Confirmed again. Dickinson and Nel back in and our pack looks handy.
It was good to see Georgia play a bit second half. Their 9 is class.
-
- Posts: 3002
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
Solid win and a plan that worked first half even if it did mean sometimes we gave long passes to the wings too early.
Need our props back for 6N but at least these have had some game time. Both played well in open play too. Best open play game Iv seen for years from Ford too.
Need our props back for 6N but at least these have had some game time. Both played well in open play too. Best open play game Iv seen for years from Ford too.
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Team for Georgia
If Fagerson is third choice who is second choice?