Lions
Moderator: OptimisticJock
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2670
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Lions
I'd rather have Dylan Hartley than Ford and thats saying something.
Jonny G had better go or I'll be very annoyed - unless he has a very bizarre collapse of form. I think I'd take him, Henderson, Itoje and Launchbury. Devin Toner has been quietly excellent as well, so I might take him too, given both Itoje and henderson could be pretty comfortable at 6.
Jonny G had better go or I'll be very annoyed - unless he has a very bizarre collapse of form. I think I'd take him, Henderson, Itoje and Launchbury. Devin Toner has been quietly excellent as well, so I might take him too, given both Itoje and henderson could be pretty comfortable at 6.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Lions
I don't think anyone has suggested Ford for the Lions, have they? He wouldn't even get picked for Scotland if we had any decent alternatives.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'd rather have Dylan Hartley than Ford and thats saying something.
Jonny G had better go or I'll be very annoyed - unless he has a very bizarre collapse of form. I think I'd take him, Henderson, Itoje and Launchbury. Devin Toner has been quietly excellent as well, so I might take him too, given both Itoje and henderson could be pretty comfortable at 6.
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2670
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Lions
hugh_woatmeigh wrote:I know it's only Georgia but both Gray boys, Seymour and Hogg put in good claims today. I still think Hogg needs to have a solid 6N from a defensive POV to convince Gatland that he's worthy of a test spot instead of a mid week place.
Ford was also very good but unless he plays like that against the big boys consistently he won't be anywhere near the party.
Er...Stones of granite wrote:I don't think anyone has suggested Ford for the Lions, have they? He wouldn't even get picked for Scotland if we had any decent alternatives.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'd rather have Dylan Hartley than Ford and thats saying something.
Jonny G had better go or I'll be very annoyed - unless he has a very bizarre collapse of form. I think I'd take him, Henderson, Itoje and Launchbury. Devin Toner has been quietly excellent as well, so I might take him too, given both Itoje and henderson could be pretty comfortable at 6.
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Lions
How is that a suggestion on my part? I know Ford won't perform that way against the big teams therefore he will be nowhere near the touring party...Eugene Wrayburn wrote:hugh_woatmeigh wrote:I know it's only Georgia but both Gray boys, Seymour and Hogg put in good claims today. I still think Hogg needs to have a solid 6N from a defensive POV to convince Gatland that he's worthy of a test spot instead of a mid week place.
Ford was also very good but unless he plays like that against the big boys consistently he won't be anywhere near the party.Er...Stones of granite wrote:I don't think anyone has suggested Ford for the Lions, have they? He wouldn't even get picked for Scotland if we had any decent alternatives.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'd rather have Dylan Hartley than Ford and thats saying something.
Jonny G had better go or I'll be very annoyed - unless he has a very bizarre collapse of form. I think I'd take him, Henderson, Itoje and Launchbury. Devin Toner has been quietly excellent as well, so I might take him too, given both Itoje and henderson could be pretty comfortable at 6.
He was superb on the weekend but it's only Georgia.
-
- Posts: 1792
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
Unless Ford has 5 games like how he played against Georgia and Scotland win the 6N he will not be a Lions tourist.
I don't see that happening
I don't see that happening
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Lions
Er what? I'm not seeing any contradiction to what I wrote.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:hugh_woatmeigh wrote:I know it's only Georgia but both Gray boys, Seymour and Hogg put in good claims today. I still think Hogg needs to have a solid 6N from a defensive POV to convince Gatland that he's worthy of a test spot instead of a mid week place.
Ford was also very good but unless he plays like that against the big boys consistently he won't be anywhere near the party.Er...Stones of granite wrote:I don't think anyone has suggested Ford for the Lions, have they? He wouldn't even get picked for Scotland if we had any decent alternatives.Eugene Wrayburn wrote:I'd rather have Dylan Hartley than Ford and thats saying something.
Jonny G had better go or I'll be very annoyed - unless he has a very bizarre collapse of form. I think I'd take him, Henderson, Itoje and Launchbury. Devin Toner has been quietly excellent as well, so I might take him too, given both Itoje and henderson could be pretty comfortable at 6.
-
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Lions
I just added Ford as an afterthought. He was one of our best 4 or 5 players on the weekend but unlike the others won't be in the mix. That's all...
-
- Posts: 2852
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm
Re: Lions
My view is that we have three players that itd be very disappointing if they didnt go. A decent sized further bunch that are contenders but have very strong rivals (and most of whom won't go) and then a few with an outside chance if they play exceptionally.
Should go (and could start):
Nel
J Gray
Hogg
Could go (in rough order of likelihood):
Richie Gray (only problem is the competition in that position)
Dickinson (if he gets fitness and form back)
Seymour
Dunbar (needs a bit of sharpness back but looking solid and not too many 12s about)
Taylor (if gets last 6N form, why not)
Jones (maybe more of an outside shot but not that much depth at 13)
Hardie (nothing recent to show but few out and out sevens so if he hits form might have an outside shot as has an ok rep)
Outside chance:
Laidlaw (I wouldnt but some rate him higher)
Russell (Id be tempted but suspect the 10s will be Sexton, Farrell and Biggar)
Maitland - I wouldnt but Gatland picked him before
Bennet (has the talent but would need to nail a place down)
Ford (as mentioned, would need to show a lot more but not that many hookers about and has experience)
Let me know if I have forgotten someone with a chance. Id like to say M Scott but not lookinh likely.
Id say the chances are it will be 3-4 but (if we win the 6N and Glasgow do well in Europe!) it could go up to around 8-9
Should go (and could start):
Nel
J Gray
Hogg
Could go (in rough order of likelihood):
Richie Gray (only problem is the competition in that position)
Dickinson (if he gets fitness and form back)
Seymour
Dunbar (needs a bit of sharpness back but looking solid and not too many 12s about)
Taylor (if gets last 6N form, why not)
Jones (maybe more of an outside shot but not that much depth at 13)
Hardie (nothing recent to show but few out and out sevens so if he hits form might have an outside shot as has an ok rep)
Outside chance:
Laidlaw (I wouldnt but some rate him higher)
Russell (Id be tempted but suspect the 10s will be Sexton, Farrell and Biggar)
Maitland - I wouldnt but Gatland picked him before
Bennet (has the talent but would need to nail a place down)
Ford (as mentioned, would need to show a lot more but not that many hookers about and has experience)
Let me know if I have forgotten someone with a chance. Id like to say M Scott but not lookinh likely.
Id say the chances are it will be 3-4 but (if we win the 6N and Glasgow do well in Europe!) it could go up to around 8-9
-
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: Lions
You could add "if the sun turns blue, if Brexit turns out to be a good thing..." ! Not going to happenCameo wrote:My view is that we have three players that itd be very disappointing if they didnt go. A decent sized further bunch that are contenders but have very strong rivals (and most of whom won't go) and then a few with an outside chance if they play exceptionally.
Should go (and could start):
Nel
J Gray
Hogg
Could go (in rough order of likelihood):
Richie Gray (only problem is the competition in that position)
Dickinson (if he gets fitness and form back)
Seymour
Dunbar (needs a bit of sharpness back but looking solid and not too many 12s about)
Taylor (if gets last 6N form, why not)
Jones (maybe more of an outside shot but not that much depth at 13)
Hardie (nothing recent to show but few out and out sevens so if he hits form might have an outside shot as has an ok rep)
Outside chance:
Laidlaw (I wouldnt but some rate him higher)
Russell (Id be tempted but suspect the 10s will be Sexton, Farrell and Biggar)
Maitland - I wouldnt but Gatland picked him before
Bennet (has the talent but would need to nail a place down)
Ford (as mentioned, would need to show a lot more but not that many hookers about and has experience)
Let me know if I have forgotten someone with a chance. Id like to say M Scott but not lookinh likely.
Id say the chances are it will be 3-4 but (if we win the 6N and Glasgow do well in Europe!) it could go up to around 8-9
-
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:12 pm
Re: Lions
Russell's only chance is in the event of an injury crisis. If that constitutes outside then fair enough.Cameo wrote:My view is that we have three players that itd be very disappointing if they didnt go. A decent sized further bunch that are contenders but have very strong rivals (and most of whom won't go) and then a few with an outside chance if they play exceptionally.
Should go (and could start):
Nel
J Gray
Hogg
Could go (in rough order of likelihood):
Richie Gray (only problem is the competition in that position)
Dickinson (if he gets fitness and form back)
Seymour
Dunbar (needs a bit of sharpness back but looking solid and not too many 12s about)
Taylor (if gets last 6N form, why not)
Jones (maybe more of an outside shot but not that much depth at 13)
Hardie (nothing recent to show but few out and out sevens so if he hits form might have an outside shot as has an ok rep)
Outside chance:
Laidlaw (I wouldnt but some rate him higher)
Russell (Id be tempted but suspect the 10s will be Sexton, Farrell and Biggar)
Maitland - I wouldnt but Gatland picked him before
Bennet (has the talent but would need to nail a place down)
Ford (as mentioned, would need to show a lot more but not that many hookers about and has experience)
Let me know if I have forgotten someone with a chance. Id like to say M Scott but not lookinh likely.
Id say the chances are it will be 3-4 but (if we win the 6N and Glasgow do well in Europe!) it could go up to around 8-9
-
- Posts: 2609
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Lions
It's going to be a very tough pick. Even if 2/8 of the main contenders are injured it will still be tough on someone.Cameo wrote:Id be very surprised is Jonny didnt go. I think Richie is worthy of a place too. To be fair I wouldnt want to be picking which second rows to leave out this year though
I've always had a lot of time for Borthwick.....he knows what he's doing.
-
- Posts: 1817
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 4:22 pm
Re: RE: Re: Lions
Sorry but I'm afraid someone has to counterjinxARM wrote:My indignation was ripe...Adder, you grande fud.
Sent from my SM-J500FN using Tapatalk
- Eugene Wrayburn
- Posts: 2670
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:32 pm
Re: Lions
That looks more or less right. I'd have Seymour and Russell and Laidlaw a little higher and Ford a little lower.Cameo wrote:My view is that we have three players that itd be very disappointing if they didnt go. A decent sized further bunch that are contenders but have very strong rivals (and most of whom won't go) and then a few with an outside chance if they play exceptionally.
Should go (and could start):
Nel
J Gray
Hogg
Could go (in rough order of likelihood):
Richie Gray (only problem is the competition in that position)
Dickinson (if he gets fitness and form back)
Seymour
Dunbar (needs a bit of sharpness back but looking solid and not too many 12s about)
Taylor (if gets last 6N form, why not)
Jones (maybe more of an outside shot but not that much depth at 13)
Hardie (nothing recent to show but few out and out sevens so if he hits form might have an outside shot as has an ok rep)
Outside chance:
Laidlaw (I wouldnt but some rate him higher)
Russell (Id be tempted but suspect the 10s will be Sexton, Farrell and Biggar)
Maitland - I wouldnt but Gatland picked him before
Bennet (has the talent but would need to nail a place down)
Ford (as mentioned, would need to show a lot more but not that many hookers about and has experience)
Let me know if I have forgotten someone with a chance. Id like to say M Scott but not lookinh likely.
Id say the chances are it will be 3-4 but (if we win the 6N and Glasgow do well in Europe!) it could go up to around 8-9
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
NS. Gone but not forgotten.
-
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:56 pm
Re: Lions
I really hope Seymour goes. He doesn't get much press outside Scotland so is something of a dark horse. But he scores tries--something close to one every two games for Scotland, which given that he's be on the losing side quite often, is pretty impressive. He is also one of the best in the business under the high ball.
-
- Posts: 1792
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
Matt Ha wrote:I really hope Seymour goes. He doesn't get much press outside Scotland so is something of a dark horse. But he scores tries--something close to one every two games for Scotland, which given that he's be on the losing side quite often, is pretty impressive. He is also one of the best in the business under the high ball.
On Sat they said he had gone through a bit of a try doubt, 5 games without a try
We had centres and wingers not so long ago that didn't score a try in 50 caps
-
- Posts: 1792
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
I really think it will depend on the 6N
If Scotland loses to Wales then we will get no more than 2 - 3 in the original party, being in Australia we may get a few more as injury cover but we really need 3 wins to have at least 1 starting Lion in a test
If Scotland loses to Wales then we will get no more than 2 - 3 in the original party, being in Australia we may get a few more as injury cover but we really need 3 wins to have at least 1 starting Lion in a test
-
- Posts: 12367
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Lions
Yep. Thought that was telling too.whatisthejava wrote:Matt Ha wrote:I really hope Seymour goes. He doesn't get much press outside Scotland so is something of a dark horse. But he scores tries--something close to one every two games for Scotland, which given that he's be on the losing side quite often, is pretty impressive. He is also one of the best in the business under the high ball.
On Sat they said he had gone through a bit of a try doubt, 5 games without a try
We had centres and wingers not so long ago that didn't score a try in 50 caps
Lamont was basically our most dangerous runner for a century, with over 100 tests, and scored 20 maybe? At a push? I guess that's where the bar of 1 in 5 comes from.
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1642
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Lions
I'd go further than this. I'd say that Scotland will get no more than 2/3 in the squad unless we have a truly exceptional 6 Nations.whatisthejava wrote:I really think it will depend on the 6N
If Scotland loses to Wales then we will get no more than 2 - 3 in the original party, being in Australia we may get a few more as injury cover but we really need 3 wins to have at least 1 starting Lion in a test
Oh, and Ford will be nowhere near it. Gatland won't even take his telephone number with him.
-
- Posts: 1792
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
Does the introduction of bonus points in the 6N help or hinder Scotland lIons selections
Will we actually try and play more adventurous rugby and go for the tries
Will we actually try and play more adventurous rugby and go for the tries
-
- Posts: 2852
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:14 pm
Re: Lions
Dont think itl make a difference to our style except of it makes some other teams open up. I think we try and play some of the most adventurous rugby in the 6N generally. Still got to be going some to score 4 tries against a good international teamwhatisthejava wrote:Does the introduction of bonus points in the 6N help or hinder Scotland lIons selections
Will we actually try and play more adventurous rugby and go for the tries
-
- Posts: 1792
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 12:13 pm
Re: Lions
Have we ever scored 4 tries in a 6N game excluding Italy
-
- Posts: 15261
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Lions
Sure, but not for a while. vs Ireland in 2006 or 2007 is maybe the most recentwhatisthejava wrote:Have we ever scored 4 tries in a 6N game excluding Italy
Edit - now I think about it that might have been 2007 and thus a WC warm up, so maybe not. 1999 and the last season of the 5N you went nuts and hammered teams, but not so much since
Further edit - yes, against Ireland still but in 2001, tries from Henderson, Leslie, Pountney and Smith in a 32-10 win