Trump
-
- Posts: 4503
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Trump
What a fucking bitching baby!
- Len
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm
Re: Trump
My mum used to put E! television on in the background when I was younger. Trump was often on it. Always knew he was a self interested cunt. Greedy and insecure. He'll do what he said he would to get into office and then he'll start feathering his bed for his own good and he won't give a fuck who loses out on the way. If you can't see what type of bloke he is you deserve to lose what you hold dear.
Harsh but fair.
Harsh but fair.
- morepork
- Posts: 7860
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Trump
Len wrote:My mum used to put E! television on in the background when I was younger. Trump was often on it. Always knew he was a self interested cunt. Greedy and insecure. He'll do what he said he would to get into office and then he'll start feathering his bed for his own good and he won't give a fuck who loses out on the way. If you can't see what type of bloke he is you deserve to lose what you hold dear.
Harsh but fair.
Fuck off. I'd rather not have my retirement money raped by some coked-up hedge fund manager on a jolly, thanks. For a recent example, see Peter Thiel in NZ.
-
- Posts: 15261
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Trump
It's worrying too, is he really saying it's okay to disregard judges if you don't like the sentence? It certainly sounds like disrespect for the law and one would have thought there are problems enough in that area without the President weighing in and making it worse. The man is an idiot, and sadly a dangerous oneWaspInWales wrote:What a fucking bitching baby!
- Len
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm
Re: Trump
So get out now and head to the land of the long white cloud.morepork wrote:Len wrote:My mum used to put E! television on in the background when I was younger. Trump was often on it. Always knew he was a self interested cunt. Greedy and insecure. He'll do what he said he would to get into office and then he'll start feathering his bed for his own good and he won't give a fuck who loses out on the way. If you can't see what type of bloke he is you deserve to lose what you hold dear.
Harsh but fair.
Fuck off. I'd rather not have my retirement money raped by some coked-up hedge fund manager on a jolly, thanks. For a recent example, see Peter Thiel in NZ.
- morepork
- Posts: 7860
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Trump
Len wrote:So get out now and head to the land of the long white cloud.morepork wrote:Len wrote:My mum used to put E! television on in the background when I was younger. Trump was often on it. Always knew he was a self interested cunt. Greedy and insecure. He'll do what he said he would to get into office and then he'll start feathering his bed for his own good and he won't give a fuck who loses out on the way. If you can't see what type of bloke he is you deserve to lose what you hold dear.
Harsh but fair.
Fuck off. I'd rather not have my retirement money raped by some coked-up hedge fund manager on a jolly, thanks. For a recent example, see Peter Thiel in NZ.
I've built a life here. Have a house, partner, career etc. My career would die on the spot in NZ, and the government down there are total fuckwits also.
-
- Posts: 4503
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Trump
It just sums him up when he doesn't get his own way. In the boardroom or taking over another company when he has the clout, he can probably get away with it, but he isn't going to get it all his way now and I was looking forward to this type of resistance. Tbh, I can't wait till he starts negotiating trade and other types deals with other leaders/representatives who are more savvy, know the laws and are not impressed with his financial portfoilio....which lets me honest, isn't that impressive.Digby wrote:It's worrying too, is he really saying it's okay to disregard judges if you don't like the sentence? It certainly sounds like disrespect for the law and one would have thought there are problems enough in that area without the President weighing in and making it worse. The man is an idiot, and sadly a dangerous oneWaspInWales wrote:What a fucking bitching baby!
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10309
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: Trump
He is learning that there are limits on his power and this is probably the first time someone has stood up to him in such a public manner and had some influence. In response he undermines the authority of the judge involved.Digby wrote:It's worrying too, is he really saying it's okay to disregard judges if you don't like the sentence? It certainly sounds like disrespect for the law and one would have thought there are problems enough in that area without the President weighing in and making it worse. The man is an idiot, and sadly a dangerous oneWaspInWales wrote:What a fucking bitching baby!
- Len
- Posts: 689
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:04 pm
Re: Trump
Adapt to survive bro. Either kick and scream and shout or move away. Europe could be a goer?morepork wrote:Len wrote:So get out now and head to the land of the long white cloud.morepork wrote:
Fuck off. I'd rather not have my retirement money raped by some coked-up hedge fund manager on a jolly, thanks. For a recent example, see Peter Thiel in NZ.
I've built a life here. Have a house, partner, career etc. My career would die on the spot in NZ, and the government down there are total fuckwits also.
-
- Posts: 4503
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: Trump
What are the odds of a bomb going off somewhere in the US at some point soon and all the 'evidence' pointing towards someone who entered the country from one of the ban list countries during the time the restrictions have been lifted?
If something like that happened, it would certainly add more weight to Trump's ban.
If something like that happened, it would certainly add more weight to Trump's ban.
- rowan
- Posts: 7756
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
- Location: Istanbul
Re: Trump
Very slim, I think. Because the major perpetrators of terrorism are not on the list. In saying that, I just can't help but think Trump may go the same way as JFK if he carries on making enemies like this.WaspInWales wrote:What are the odds of a bomb going off somewhere in the US at some point soon and all the 'evidence' pointing towards someone who entered the country from one of the ban list countries during the time the restrictions have been lifted?
If something like that happened, it would certainly add more weight to Trump's ban.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
-
- Posts: 15261
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Trump
He does seem to think he can now act as King or Emperor Trump. If he's already blaming the judiciary for upholding the law I wonder how he'll get on with Congress when they will not finance some of his plans, they'll likely be behind his tax cuts, but not his infrastructure plans. Though his infrastructure plans might be just a lie to help get elected.canta_brian wrote:
Too far?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9429
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Trump
I don't think WiW was suggesting that any such bomb would actually have been planted by someone from a banned-list country; just that looks the conveniently located and legible evidence would point that wayrowan wrote:Very slim, I think. Because the major perpetrators of terrorism are not on the list. In saying that, I just can't help but think Trump may go the same way as JFK if he carries on making enemies like this.WaspInWales wrote:What are the odds of a bomb going off somewhere in the US at some point soon and all the 'evidence' pointing towards someone who entered the country from one of the ban list countries during the time the restrictions have been lifted?
If something like that happened, it would certainly add more weight to Trump's ban.
- rowan
- Posts: 7756
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
- Location: Istanbul
Re: Trump
I see. Well, that wouldn't be anything new, of course. They usually just blame mass killings on 'ISIS' these days, which most Americans broadly cognize as 'Islamic extremism' - without giving any thought at all to which countries might have been involved. So, yes, the odds in that case would be pretty high.Which Tyler wrote:I don't think WiW was suggesting that any such bomb would actually have been planted by someone from a banned-list country; just that looks the conveniently located and legible evidence would point that wayrowan wrote:Very slim, I think. Because the major perpetrators of terrorism are not on the list. In saying that, I just can't help but think Trump may go the same way as JFK if he carries on making enemies like this.WaspInWales wrote:What are the odds of a bomb going off somewhere in the US at some point soon and all the 'evidence' pointing towards someone who entered the country from one of the ban list countries during the time the restrictions have been lifted?
If something like that happened, it would certainly add more weight to Trump's ban.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
- morepork
- Posts: 7860
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Trump
rowan wrote:I see. Well, that wouldn't be anything new, of course. They usually just blame mass killings on 'ISIS' these days, which most Americans broadly cognize as 'Islamic extremism' - without giving any thought at all to which countries might have been involved. So, yes, the odds in that case would be pretty high.Which Tyler wrote:I don't think WiW was suggesting that any such bomb would actually have been planted by someone from a banned-list country; just that looks the conveniently located and legible evidence would point that wayrowan wrote:
Very slim, I think. Because the major perpetrators of terrorism are not on the list. In saying that, I just can't help but think Trump may go the same way as JFK if he carries on making enemies like this.
You speak for all of them do you Captain Condescension? They are pretty fukin aware none of the relevant countries are on this childish immigration ban, I can tell you that.
- rowan
- Posts: 7756
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
- Location: Istanbul
Re: Trump
Hostility for the sake of hostily because you absolutely cannot stand it when someone does not think as you do. What a childmorepork wrote:rowan wrote:I see. Well, that wouldn't be anything new, of course. They usually just blame mass killings on 'ISIS' these days, which most Americans broadly cognize as 'Islamic extremism' - without giving any thought at all to which countries might have been involved. So, yes, the odds in that case would be pretty high.Which Tyler wrote:
I don't think WiW was suggesting that any such bomb would actually have been planted by someone from a banned-list country; just that looks the conveniently located and legible evidence would point that way
You speak for all of them do you Captain Condescension? They are pretty fukin aware none of the relevant countries are on this childish immigration ban, I can tell you that.
& you completely missed the point there, Captain Hypocrite, because I was very clearly referring to ISIS, not the list of banned countries.
Obviously I don't presume to speak for all Americans. That's just the perception I get from the many Americans I know and from their own American news.
So who's being condescending here?
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
- rowan
- Posts: 7756
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
- Location: Istanbul
Re: Trump
Well, 9/11 notwithstanding, terrorist attacks by foreign Muslims on American soil are extremely rare. If there were one, it would be blamed on ISIS, regardless the nationality of the perpetrator. My guess is, the media would pay little attention to their nationality and far more to their religion, which in turn would heavily influence the general perception of the incident among the public. I'm not sure how much Trump and his team would manipulate such an event to pursue an agenda, as he certainly seems more of the bull in a China shop variety of president than the treachorous snake in the grass type that his predecessor surely was.
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
- morepork
- Posts: 7860
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Trump
Which is exactly the narrartive that is being had over here by actual people that aren't on You Tube. There is so much redundancy in your tediously repetitive narrative. We get it, the media has fucked the dog for a long time, multiple administrations have pushed military action that has unnecessarily cost lives. Fuck me, we get it. What you are maybe missing is the fact that Team Trumpet has made a point on waging war on the media, but their alternative is being dictated to them by big tech...Facebook, Google, etc. He is thick enough to give them the keys to deep, deep levels of intelligence if it allows him to control the narrative (shit.....maybe you two are related!). This is why the cunt pushes Twatter so aggressively.