Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Moderator: Puja

Pie Man
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:29 am

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Pie Man »

Hard to believe Sinckler was a full-back (or might have been centre) at school. Must have had a subsequent accident in a radiation laboratory on a school trip somewhere down the line.
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 2197
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Spiffy »

Mellsblue wrote:Chisholm is seriously quick.
Yes. And Charlie Walker (ex sprinter) looks the fastest man on the pitch. Great acceleration for his try.
Pie Man
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:29 am

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Pie Man »

Spiffy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:Chisholm is seriously quick.
Yes. And Charlie Walker (ex sprinter) looks the fastest man on the pitch. Great acceleration for his try.
Yep. He's got one of those much fabled "only a bit slower than Usain Bolt but whilst wearing socks and running on grass" 100m times. Like Ugo Monye and Tom Varndell back in the day.
Renniks
Posts: 886
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Renniks »

Jesus, he's properly quick.

Great try
Pie Man
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:29 am

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Pie Man »

Yeah, I was being serious about that 100m time....
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 15724
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Mellsblue »

You can't beat serious gas in the back three.
Renniks
Posts: 886
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Renniks »

This just seems like everything is clicking for quins (apart from a few overlaps)

Turnovers going great, sprint finishes going their way, forwards making breaks, and topping it off with Chisholm having the foresight to have his foot in touch for that lineout.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9038
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Which Tyler »

Hate to say it, but Austin is dead right - we're killing ourselves by not designating someone to play SH.
Of course, it's game over now. Stupid, stupid stupid!

And of course, Quins can now cheat as much as they like, cos they can simply afford to; we're not going to kick for points, and the ref doesn't want to use his card; and even if he does they've plenty of cushion; and at some stage, we're just going to give the ball back anyway.
Pie Man
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:29 am

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Pie Man »

Wallace with a great carry there. Is Eddie watching?
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 15724
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Mellsblue »

Quins really need to work on converting overlaps.
Banquo
Posts: 20225
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Banquo »

not able to watch, but just seen the score..wtf. Bath must have some big issues, that's a decent team in theory.
Renniks
Posts: 886
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Renniks »

Banquo wrote:not able to watch, but just seen the score..wtf. Bath must have some big issues, that's a decent team in theory.
They've butchered quite a bit, and Cook had a yellow that they really suffered for…
but Quins have looked like a side that would have challenged a lot of teams.
Banquo
Posts: 20225
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Banquo »

Renniks wrote:
Banquo wrote:not able to watch, but just seen the score..wtf. Bath must have some big issues, that's a decent team in theory.
They've butchered quite a bit, and Cook had a yellow that they really suffered for…
but Quins have looked like a side that would have challenged a lot of teams.
good effort given even their own fans were a tad worried
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9038
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Which Tyler »

Banquo wrote:not able to watch, but just seen the score..wtf. Bath must have some big issues, that's a decent team in theory.
We were playing the better rugby, for the first 30 minutes or so; but kept shooting ourselves in the foot with stupidity.
We then tried to shooting ourselves in the foot, but missed and blew our whole leg off with Cook going for a deliberate knock-on and getting rightly yellowed.
Quins found a wave of confidence, and put 24 points on us in 10 minutes as we tried to play without anyone acting scrum half in attack or defence; and the rest is history.

Basically there was nothing in it; then there was a fairly brief period where everything went right for Quins, and everything went wrong for Bath (of their own making) and that period was all that was needed. Expect Quins to make this even more embarrassing in the last 20 as Bath tire physically - we already have mentally.
Last edited by Which Tyler on Fri Mar 11, 2016 9:12 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 15724
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Mellsblue »

F*** me that's ugly. How can Banahan be allowed to do that.
Pie Man
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:29 am

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Pie Man »

Banquo wrote:
Renniks wrote:
Banquo wrote:not able to watch, but just seen the score..wtf. Bath must have some big issues, that's a decent team in theory.
They've butchered quite a bit, and Cook had a yellow that they really suffered for…
but Quins have looked like a side that would have challenged a lot of teams.
good effort given even their own fans were a tad worried
Yup. Let's say that I'm pleasantly surprised. We've decided to start offering runners for the offloader again rather than dying in contact.
Pie Man
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:29 am

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Pie Man »

Ooooh. This is classic Quins now.
Renniks
Posts: 886
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Renniks »

If all rugby matches that didn't involve your own team could be like this it would be quite wonderful.
Banquo
Posts: 20225
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Banquo »

Which Tyler wrote:
Banquo wrote:not able to watch, but just seen the score..wtf. Bath must have some big issues, that's a decent team in theory.
We were playing the better rugby, for the first 30 minutes or so; but kept shooting ourselves in the foot with stupidity.
We then tried to shooting ourselves in the foot, but missed and blew our whole leg off with Cook going for a deliberate knock-on and getting rightly yellowed.
Quins found a wave of confidence, and put 24 points on us in 10 minutes as we tried to play without anyone acting scrum half in attack or defence; and the rest is history.

Basically there was nothing in it; then there was a fairly brief period where everything went right for Quins, and everything went wrong for Bath (of their own making) and that period was all that was needed. Expect Quins to make this even more embarrassing in the last 20 as Bath tire physically - we already have mentally.
...or... :)
Renniks
Posts: 886
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Renniks »

Taking away 1 point is the right decision after being 29 points down.

Still, you kind of wish they went for the try
16th man
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by 16th man »

Got to wonder what the ultimate outcome would have been had the ref shown Quins a yellow card in that earlier spell of consistent penalties.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9038
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Which Tyler »

16th man wrote:Got to wonder what the ultimate outcome would have been had the ref shown Quins a yellow card in that earlier spell of consistent penalties.
The biggest toss of a coin was Easter in the first 5 minutes. Had he not regathered that would have been a yellow all day long; with Bath on the front foot early (and what a match by FEaster today; getting him off the pitch for 10 minutes would have made a massive difference).
Take that out, and it looked like Bath could have been cutting loose, no-one would be talking about the Mafi near-try (I think short anyway, ref was right).
Chances are Cook wouldn't have gone for that tap-down were we ahead on the board; and that "10 minutes of madness" would never have happened.

However, it did happen, and in 10 minutes of rugby, Quins played properly well, everything they touched turned to gold; and won the match there and then.

Quite honestly; Bath could have had about 3 yellows; Quins could have had 4-5; and both coaches should stop bitching.
Pie Man
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 11:29 am

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Pie Man »

Which Tyler wrote:
16th man wrote:Got to wonder what the ultimate outcome would have been had the ref shown Quins a yellow card in that earlier spell of consistent penalties.
The biggest toss of a coin was Easter in the first 5 minutes. Had he not regathered that would have been a yellow all day long; with Bath on the front foot early (and what a match by FEaster today; getting him off the pitch for 10 minutes would have made a massive difference).
Take that out, and it looked like Bath could have been cutting loose, no-one would be talking about the Mafi near-try (I think short anyway, ref was right).
Chances are Cook wouldn't have gone for that tap-down were we ahead on the board; and that "10 minutes of madness" would never have happened.

However, it did happen, and in 10 minutes of rugby, Quins played properly well, everything they touched turned to gold; and won the match there and then.

Quite honestly; Bath could have had about 3 yellows; Quins could have had 4-5; and both coaches should stop bitching.
It was interesting with the commentators talking about the "palms up" versus "palms down" deliberate knock-on when Charlie Walker was almost away for his hat-trick - was the Cook knock-on a slap down or was he genuinely trying to gather the ball? I missed that at the time. I suppose if you have re-gathered the ball then you must have made an effort to keep the ball alive by keeping it "up". If Easter had then subsequently dropped it, would it just be a knock for having tits-for-hands or deemed deliberate?
PPJ
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 1:48 pm
Location: Bath

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by PPJ »

Really fed up with the crap Bath are serving up,only started playing when Quins off loaded the bench.
Harvey Quin
Posts: 29
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 4:02 pm

Re: Quins V Bath Fri 7.45

Post by Harvey Quin »

Lambert's certainly enjoying his time in the sun. He's never been more than a decent backup but he's running around like a rhino on acid these days
Post Reply