Lurk.....
- Galfon
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
- Galfon
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Lurk.....
Lurk table - current standings..
1. Serj: 40 Lurkels
2. Bruce: 22
3. Galfon:20
4.= Banq.: 1
4.= Toad: 1
Rest: 0.
1. Serj: 40 Lurkels
2. Bruce: 22
3. Galfon:20
4.= Banq.: 1
4.= Toad: 1
Rest: 0.
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2171
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2171
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
- canta_brian
- Posts: 1285
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm
Re: RE: Re: Lurk.....
A 132 lb scrotum counts for nothing?Galfon wrote:Lurk table - current standings..
1. Serj: 40 Lurkels
2. Bruce: 22
3. Galfon:20
4.= Banq.: 1
4.= Toad: 1
Rest: 0.
- Galfon
- Posts: 4568
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm
Re: Lurk.....
If the post was in fact related to the impressive scrotal mass, rather than a general comment, then on reconsideration the very rare 'special bono' is awarded, bringing 5 lurkels.
(serj's piggy-heaven 69 had been the only other thus far,and on countback is awarded an extra missed lurkel..)
Lurk table - current standings..
1. Serj: 41 Lurkels
2=.Bruce: 22
2=.Galfon: 22
4. Cantabrian: 5
5.= Banq.: 1
5.= Toad: 1
(serj's piggy-heaven 69 had been the only other thus far,and on countback is awarded an extra missed lurkel..)
Lurk table - current standings..
1. Serj: 41 Lurkels
2=.Bruce: 22
2=.Galfon: 22
4. Cantabrian: 5
5.= Banq.: 1
5.= Toad: 1