Women's rugby world cup
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Women's rugby world cup
England women can pick a proper 7. They're still getting dicked in the backrow but at least the girls are trying to play the game.
-
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:46 am
Re: Women's rugby world cup
NZ worthy winners, but I thought the ref let their supporting players dive over the ball at the rucks in the second half. A penalty or two might have evened things up.scuzzaman wrote:I listened to the BBC commentary.
Two, they thought the ref had a wonderful game. (ahem!)
- jngf
- Posts: 1563
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: Women's rugby world cup
Agreed, imo Marlie Packer is a demonstrably far more instinctive and effective openside for the England woman's side than either Haskell or Robshaw have ever been for the mens' sidePuja wrote:The women's team has always seemed to have a proper no 7 that I wish the men's could poach - Alphonsi, Fisher, Packer.loudnconfident wrote:Just caught it on catch-up. Great to watch, tough match and good handling in those conditions. I know this board has long bemoaned the lack of "proper" No 7s in the senior men's game. Perhaps we could co-opt Marlie Packer?
Puja
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: Women's rugby world cup
The new ruck laws seem to be quite helpful at identifying players going off their feet. I have a feeling the WRWC weren't using them. Now I'm thinking, they definitely weren't because they were still kicking through the ruck.loudnconfident wrote: NZ worthy winners, but I thought the ref let their supporting players dive over the ball at the rucks in the second half. A penalty or two might have evened things up.
Why are the new ruck laws helpful ?...give me a minute to gather my train of thought......because it extends the amount of time the defenders have to get their hands on the ball.