Women's rugby world cup

Moderator: Puja

kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: Women's rugby world cup

Post by kk67 »

England women can pick a proper 7. They're still getting dicked in the backrow but at least the girls are trying to play the game.
loudnconfident
Posts: 348
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:46 am

Re: Women's rugby world cup

Post by loudnconfident »

scuzzaman wrote:I listened to the BBC commentary.

Two, they thought the ref had a wonderful game. (ahem!)
NZ worthy winners, but I thought the ref let their supporting players dive over the ball at the rucks in the second half. A penalty or two might have evened things up.
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1563
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: Women's rugby world cup

Post by jngf »

Puja wrote:
loudnconfident wrote:Just caught it on catch-up. Great to watch, tough match and good handling in those conditions. I know this board has long bemoaned the lack of "proper" No 7s in the senior men's game. Perhaps we could co-opt Marlie Packer?
The women's team has always seemed to have a proper no 7 that I wish the men's could poach - Alphonsi, Fisher, Packer.

Puja
Agreed, imo Marlie Packer is a demonstrably far more instinctive and effective openside for the England woman's side than either Haskell or Robshaw have ever been for the mens' side
kk67
Posts: 2117
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm

Re: Women's rugby world cup

Post by kk67 »

loudnconfident wrote: NZ worthy winners, but I thought the ref let their supporting players dive over the ball at the rucks in the second half. A penalty or two might have evened things up.
The new ruck laws seem to be quite helpful at identifying players going off their feet. I have a feeling the WRWC weren't using them. Now I'm thinking, they definitely weren't because they were still kicking through the ruck.
Why are the new ruck laws helpful ?...give me a minute to gather my train of thought......because it extends the amount of time the defenders have to get their hands on the ball.
Post Reply