England openside - who offers most in attack?
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
Ok,..but he's on the long list.
-
- Posts: 12119
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
I can't really recall that game or that performance, which perhaps says a lot in itself, but was it any less spectacular than the average performance from (60 caps or so of) the Haskatron? I wish Clifford had got a run in one position at some point but it seems he's had his chances in dribs and drabs and now they're gone.Scrumhead wrote:Clifford has played 7 for England. Most recently against Wales in the last 6 Nations. He was anonymous. I don't think Eddie's going to be going in that particular direction again ...
-
- Posts: 2117
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 6:27 pm
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
Weren't you in a similar position...?. some years ago.Mikey Brown wrote: but it seems he's had his chances in dribs and drabs and now they're gone.
-
- Posts: 448
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
I'd disagree with anonymous.Scrumhead wrote:Clifford has played 7 for England. Most recently against Wales in the last 6 Nations. He was anonymous. I don't think Eddie's going to be going in that particular direction again ...
I'd agree Jones doesn't look like he'll be going back in that direct action and probably rightly so. He's just not breakdown savvy enough to make it work.
edit: To compare with Hask, it was as busy in defence and a lot smarter in attack (when he actually saw the ball), but lacked the physicality. So... yeah, I'd probably rather have prime Hask.
-
- Posts: 5975
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
OK - perhaps anonymous was harsh. I am big fan of Clifford, but it was a 6/10 performance at best. That game was a huge chance for him to show what he could do and he didn't do anything to suggest he should be considered a leading candidate to replace Haskell.
Personally I think Clifford is best at 8, but his chances of getting past Billy and Hughes are very slim and even if both were injured (heaven forbid), I'm not 100% sure he'd be next in line.
After Luke Wallace's injury, he'll probably end up playing 7 quite a bit for Quins when James Chisholm is fit to play at 8. If that happens and he's playing well, who knows, but right now, I don't see him as a realistic contender for the 7 shirt for England.
Personally I think Clifford is best at 8, but his chances of getting past Billy and Hughes are very slim and even if both were injured (heaven forbid), I'm not 100% sure he'd be next in line.
After Luke Wallace's injury, he'll probably end up playing 7 quite a bit for Quins when James Chisholm is fit to play at 8. If that happens and he's playing well, who knows, but right now, I don't see him as a realistic contender for the 7 shirt for England.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
http://en.espn.co.uk/scrum/rugby/match/255011.html 1 pass and 2 carries in 48 minutes, making 2 meters and being turned over once.Peat wrote:I'd disagree with anonymous.Scrumhead wrote:Clifford has played 7 for England. Most recently against Wales in the last 6 Nations. He was anonymous. I don't think Eddie's going to be going in that particular direction again ...
I'd agree Jones doesn't look like he'll be going back in that direct action and probably rightly so. He's just not breakdown savvy enough to make it work.
edit: To compare with Hask, it was as busy in defence and a lot smarter in attack (when he actually saw the ball), but lacked the physicality. So... yeah, I'd probably rather have prime Hask.
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:19 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
If you assume that Billy V and Hughes we have some really good options at 8, I think it's just about balance isn't it? We'd all love a Pocock or a Hooper but they're not there. We do have players who have other attributes though. I'd have thought that we can get some really good future options as a 6 and 7 combo, depending on the specifics that we're after, from any of:
Underhill
Currys
Sam Jones
Ludlum - I've been drawn back in...
Chisholm
Ellis
With some slightly longer shots but feasibly:
Evans
Nott
Clifford - would be in the top list but I think he's likely to be a better 8 and injuries are an issue
Etc
Am sure there are loads I've missed but we're finally seeing a good crop of back row players coming through
Underhill
Currys
Sam Jones
Ludlum - I've been drawn back in...
Chisholm
Ellis
With some slightly longer shots but feasibly:
Evans
Nott
Clifford - would be in the top list but I think he's likely to be a better 8 and injuries are an issue
Etc
Am sure there are loads I've missed but we're finally seeing a good crop of back row players coming through
-
- Posts: 5975
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
Definitely. Lots of reasons to be optimistic. You can add Ben Earl and Jack Willis to that list too.
Earl is probably a season or two off breaking through at Sarries, but as Isiekwe has shown, it can be done when a young player is showing enough potential.
Jack Willis is already getting in to Wasps' match day squads.
Also good to think we have quality 8s coming through in Simmonds and Mercer.
Earl is probably a season or two off breaking through at Sarries, but as Isiekwe has shown, it can be done when a young player is showing enough potential.
Jack Willis is already getting in to Wasps' match day squads.
Also good to think we have quality 8s coming through in Simmonds and Mercer.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
Not sure about Ludlam, he looked a little podgy last time out, maybe Saints are in the process of bulking up another player as Mallinder develops the shock tactic of going over the top in a move that's bound to catch out the Hun , if he is simply bulking up he'll hopefully looked trim down in a few weeks/as the season progresses
-
- Posts: 5975
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
I've only seen the highlights so I can't say I saw it with my own eyes, but by all accounts Ludlam was one of the few Saints players that stood-up to Sarries. His try was well taken too.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
Standing out for Saints isn't the standard for England
-
- Posts: 5975
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
Perhaps not, but let's give the guy a chance though ... he's not going to face too many better than a rampant Sarries pack.
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:19 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
Mercer looks an 8 all day long id but you never kno
Chick could work as a 6 I'd have thought? Not seen too much of him mind
Chick could work as a 6 I'd have thought? Not seen too much of him mind
-
- Posts: 1539
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:11 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
shame Saints are signing Brussow, guess he could have till then to make a big impact.
would put Evans ahead of him still.
Long term i think Sale have the best 6 and 7 prospect in Nott and Curry (Either one).
would put Evans ahead of him still.
Long term i think Sale have the best 6 and 7 prospect in Nott and Curry (Either one).
- Puja
- Posts: 17650
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
Hugo?TheNomad wrote:If you assume that Billy V and Hughes we have some really good options at 8, I think it's just about balance isn't it? We'd all love a Pocock or a Hooper but they're not there. We do have players who have other attributes though. I'd have thought that we can get some really good future options as a 6 and 7 combo, depending on the specifics that we're after, from any of:
Underhill
Currys
Sam Jones
Ludlum - I've been drawn back in...
Chisholm
Ellis
With some slightly longer shots but feasibly:
Evans
Nott
Clifford - would be in the top list but I think he's likely to be a better 8 and injuries are an issue
Etc
Am sure there are loads I've missed but we're finally seeing a good crop of back row players coming through
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 5975
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
Who is Hugo?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9136
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
TomPuja wrote:Hugo?TheNomad wrote: Ellis
- Puja
- Posts: 17650
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
Ah, right. That makes sense. Had a mental blank.Which Tyler wrote:TomPuja wrote:Hugo?TheNomad wrote: Ellis
Future England Captain c2008 Hugo Ellis - The great white hope of the English game: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/rugbyu ... prize.htmlScrumhead wrote:Who is Hugo?
Puja
Backist Monk
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14556
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
No. You go.Puja wrote:Hugo?TheNomad wrote:If you assume that Billy V and Hughes we have some really good options at 8, I think it's just about balance isn't it? We'd all love a Pocock or a Hooper but they're not there. We do have players who have other attributes though. I'd have thought that we can get some really good future options as a 6 and 7 combo, depending on the specifics that we're after, from any of:
Underhill
Currys
Sam Jones
Ludlum - I've been drawn back in...
Chisholm
Ellis
With some slightly longer shots but feasibly:
Evans
Nott
Clifford - would be in the top list but I think he's likely to be a better 8 and injuries are an issue
Etc
Am sure there are loads I've missed but we're finally seeing a good crop of back row players coming through
Puja
-
- Posts: 19093
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
well you have to start somewhere, nicht wahr??Digby wrote:Standing out for Saints isn't the standard for England
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
1000 miles less a step to go thenBanquo wrote:well you have to start somewhere, nicht wahr??Digby wrote:Standing out for Saints isn't the standard for England
-
- Posts: 19093
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
Indeed, but that step is summat....he wasn't even starting last year.Digby wrote:1000 miles less a step to go thenBanquo wrote:well you have to start somewhere, nicht wahr??Digby wrote:Standing out for Saints isn't the standard for England
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
Which was odd when Saints didn't remotely look like winning anything and were at no threat of going down. Hopefully he keeps playing, a perhaps forlorn hope if Brussow and Shields joinBanquo wrote:Indeed, but that step is summat....he wasn't even starting last year.Digby wrote:1000 miles less a step to go thenBanquo wrote: well you have to start somewhere, nicht wahr??
-
- Posts: 19093
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
Its a shame that Mallinder hasn't developed as a coachDigby wrote:Which was odd when Saints didn't remotely look like winning anything and were at no threat of going down. Hopefully he keeps playing, a perhaps forlorn hope if Brussow and Shields joinBanquo wrote:Indeed, but that step is summat....he wasn't even starting last year.Digby wrote:
1000 miles less a step to go then
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: England openside - who offers most in attack?
It's even a shame he doesn't seem to have even tried to develop. There re are of course plenty of good things happening at Saints, just on balance not enough,their game hasn't progressed enough, nor taken account of what they could be doing with the assets they have. He's England's version of Gatland, he's got a plan that can work with the right players even if a little limited, and sticks to it no matter whether it's workingBanquo wrote:Its a shame that Mallinder hasn't developed as a coachDigby wrote:Which was odd when Saints didn't remotely look like winning anything and were at no threat of going down. Hopefully he keeps playing, a perhaps forlorn hope if Brussow and Shields joinBanquo wrote: Indeed, but that step is summat....he wasn't even starting last year.