Wasps vs Bath

Moderator: Puja

User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14556
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Mellsblue »

I'm not sure if it's because I'm a bit under the weather and tired, but Healey is really getting on my nerves this weekend.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14556
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Mellsblue »

Henry Thomas is absolute quality. I hope he gets an injury free run. Same for Zach Mercer.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14556
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Mellsblue »

I think we can safely say that the new laws haven't affected the resourcing of the breakdowns. It's one hell of a battle at the breakdown.
Banquo
Posts: 19094
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote:Henry Thomas is absolute quality. I hope he gets an injury free run. Same for Zach Mercer.
yep, Mercer very mobile and visible; Underhill under the radar, unseen work :)
Banquo
Posts: 19094
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote:I think we can safely say that the new laws haven't affected the resourcing of the breakdowns. It's one hell of a battle at the breakdown.
I'd say its more selective and counter rucking than el jackelo?
Last edited by Banquo on Sun Oct 01, 2017 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Banquo
Posts: 19094
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Hopefully Hughes be ok
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9138
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Which Tyler »

Carley has really taken against Bath's front row - no idea if he's right or not
Banquo
Posts: 19094
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Which Tyler wrote:Carley has really taken against Bath's front row - no idea if he's right or not
its all very mysterious. Not a great half in truth.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14556
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:I think we can safely say that the new laws haven't affected the resourcing of the breakdowns. It's one hell of a battle at the breakdown.
I'd say its more selective and counter rucking than el jackelo.
Agreed. It was a comment on numbers in there battling rather than the specific tactics. A couple of posters here may have decried the end of rugby as we knew it after Exeter v Wasps last weekend, and it might have been an admission by one of them that he may have been a bit premature.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14556
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:Carley has really taken against Bath's front row - no idea if he's right or not
its all very mysterious. Not a great half in truth.
He's not alone. There have been a few dodgy performances from the refs so far this season.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by 16th man »

Pretty damn scrappy. Both defences rushing, playing right on the edge of, and over, the offside line, stifling space.
TheNomad
Posts: 630
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:19 am

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by TheNomad »

Did Hughes go off?
Banquo
Posts: 19094
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:I think we can safely say that the new laws haven't affected the resourcing of the breakdowns. It's one hell of a battle at the breakdown.
I'd say its more selective and counter rucking than el jackelo.
Agreed. It was a comment on numbers in there battling rather than the specific tactics. A couple of posters here may have decried the end of rugby as we knew it after Exeter v Wasps last weekend, and it might have been an admission by one of them that he may have been a bit premature.
That'd be me then :). I still think there are less being committed on the whole, but as someone else pointed out, it could lead to what we are seeing; defences are stringing out, but then selecting when to blitz and counter ruck. I still maintain its still too weighted towards ball retention/attack, and the game would be much better for having more, and more contests at the breakdown, unless you enjoy many very similar phases of rugby, waiting for a defensive error.and I still think the direction of travel for RU is wrong, but I did before the new laws.
Last edited by Banquo on Sun Oct 01, 2017 3:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14556
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Mellsblue »

TheNomad wrote:Did Hughes go off?
Yep. The concensus seems to be dead leg so nothing too serious.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9138
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Which Tyler »

Yep, "scrappy" is definitely the word of the match - along with idiot commentators
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14556
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote: I'd say its more selective and counter rucking than el jackelo.
Agreed. It was a comment on numbers in there battling rather than the specific tactics. A couple of posters here may have decried the end of rugby as we knew it after Exeter v Wasps last weekend, and it might have been an admission by one of them that he may have been a bit premature.
That'd be me then :). I still think there are less being committed on the whole, but as someone else pointed out, it could lead to what we are seeing; defences are stringing out, but then selecting when to blitz and counter ruck. I still maintain its still too weighted towards ball retention/attack, and the game would be much better for having more, and more contests at the breakdown, unless you enjoy many very similar phases of rugby, waiting for a defensive error..
Agree with all that. It's the opposite end to when the powers that be gave too much leeway to the defensive team and, as the team in possession were scared of losing the ball at the breakdown, all we watched was kick tennis. Why they fiddled with it I'll never understand.
Banquo
Posts: 19094
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Wasps really struggling for direction; not sure they know what they are trying to do
Banquo
Posts: 19094
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Hope Freddy comes on at 10
Banquo
Posts: 19094
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

Huzza
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by 16th man »

Half an hour for Burns to have a crack at taking the starting slot.

Priestland pretty uninspiring today, so some sparkle and wit could go a long way.
Banquo
Posts: 19094
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

16th man wrote:Half an hour for Burns to have a crack at taking the starting slot.

Priestland pretty uninspiring today, so some sparkle and wit could go a long way.
aye, and a good start.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9138
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Which Tyler »

16th man wrote:Half an hour for Burns to have a crack at taking the starting slot.

Priestland pretty uninspiring today, so some sparkle and wit could go a long way.
Rhys was a step (back) up on last week, but he's leaving the option open there.

That's a lot of strapping on that left leg for Freddie there...
Banquo
Posts: 19094
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

painful
Banquo
Posts: 19094
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Banquo »

at least Simpson is out of giving us misery :)

Its all too flat and lateral to be honest; two sides shorn of players and confidence, I guess
Last edited by Banquo on Sun Oct 01, 2017 4:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5975
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Wasps vs Bath

Post by Scrumhead »

This really is a terrible game ...
Post Reply