England squad named
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 12120
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: England squad named
French flankers wearing the wrong numbers. Christ. Here we go again.
- jngf
- Posts: 1565
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm
Re: England squad named
Yes, it confused me no end that Jean Pierre Rives used to wear the 6 shirt ditto Eric Champ...Mikey Brown wrote:French flankers wearing the wrong numbers. Christ. Here we go again.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: England squad named
It does still rather inform what sort of flanker the locks make, and what sort of centre the 10s make.TheNomad wrote:One of those locks has been playing 6 all season - which makes that look more balancedDigby wrote:6 locks and 6 10s gives a sense the pack will not play at pace and the backs need to play with width. More to it than that, but in advance it doesn't look to have a natural balance.
And there aren't 6 10s there. Slade has been at 13 all year, Francis is happy in either role, and Farrell started at 12 for the Lions as well as all 6Ns, so I don't feel we're lacking cover at 12 or 13. I'd have still liked Marchant to be there personally and not sure what Francis adds. He wouldn't be there if Teo was fit in my opinion
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: England squad named
Or not, as the case may beBanquo wrote:Its basically fingers crossed Care and Youngs stay fit.
- Puja
- Posts: 17656
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: England squad named
Yeah, I think that's our Plan A regardless of who trains with the squad. If one of them's injured, the other will play 75-80 minutes. If both are injured, we're stuffed no matter what we do.Banquo wrote:Its on the odd side, but has been for a while. Its basically fingers crossed Care and Youngs stay fit.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:19 am
Re: England squad named
Fair comment!Digby wrote:It does still rather inform what sort of flanker the locks make, and what sort of centre the 10s make.TheNomad wrote:One of those locks has been playing 6 all season - which makes that look more balancedDigby wrote:6 locks and 6 10s gives a sense the pack will not play at pace and the backs need to play with width. More to it than that, but in advance it doesn't look to have a natural balance.
And there aren't 6 10s there. Slade has been at 13 all year, Francis is happy in either role, and Farrell started at 12 for the Lions as well as all 6Ns, so I don't feel we're lacking cover at 12 or 13. I'd have still liked Marchant to be there personally and not sure what Francis adds. He wouldn't be there if Teo was fit in my opinion
-
- Posts: 5891
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: England squad named
The idea of resting the Lions seems to have bitten the dust. Maybe a few will sit out the Samoa game.
I agree with most of the squad, but like others, do question the balance in one or two areas. Only 2 SH's strikes me as genuinely odd. Pity Maunder isnt fit as i'm sure he would have been included. 6 locks is overdoing it a bit.
i like the apprentice idea. Good to get these promising young players involved. Simmonds call up is very welcome.
Disappointed there's no Wilson or Armand.
I agree with most of the squad, but like others, do question the balance in one or two areas. Only 2 SH's strikes me as genuinely odd. Pity Maunder isnt fit as i'm sure he would have been included. 6 locks is overdoing it a bit.
i like the apprentice idea. Good to get these promising young players involved. Simmonds call up is very welcome.
Disappointed there's no Wilson or Armand.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6361
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: England squad named
Brown's presence in the squad indicates that Eddie has yet to write him off and gives Haskell hope.
Despite his earlier suggestions about Lions players, he has rested nobody has he?
Despite his earlier suggestions about Lions players, he has rested nobody has he?
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:19 am
Re: England squad named
So, Simmonds gets picked at 7 for the Chiefs this weekend. Interesting.
Poor Matt Kvesic
Poor Matt Kvesic
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6361
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: England squad named
Sorry 5P, posted at the same time. I don't think there are 6 locks. Lawes and/or Itoje are picked in their current positions based on numbers.fivepointer wrote:The idea of resting the Lions seems to have bitten the dust. Maybe a few will sit out the Samoa game.
I agree with most of the squad, but like others, do question the balance in one or two areas. Only 2 SH's strikes me as genuinely odd. Pity Maunder isnt fit as i'm sure he would have been included. 6 locks is overdoing it a bit.
i like the apprentice idea. Good to get these promising young players involved. Simmonds call up is very welcome.
Disappointed there's no Wilson or Armand.
Maybe, Eddie sees Lozowski as 12 back-up only because I can't see anyone starting at 10 other than Ford or Farrell. Should Ford get injured, Farrell is certain to start at 10, IMO.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6361
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: England squad named
Yes, Kvesic is what, 4th choice?TheNomad wrote:So, Simmonds gets picked at 7 for the Chiefs this weekend. Interesting.
Poor Matt Kvesic
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14556
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: England squad named
On the SH situation. I don't think Spencer has what it takes. I like Maunder but he obviously can't be picked. However, it's a real issue that if Youngs or Care are injured we're picking a complete rookie or Wigglesworth who certainly isn't the future and is a totally different style of scrumhalf. At some point, Jones has to admit that his third choice SH isn't up to the standard he'd like and work with what he has.
-
- Posts: 5979
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: England squad named
Interesting to see Simmonds has been picked at 7 for Exeter’s visit to Sale. Could that be anything to do with Eddie?
- Puja
- Posts: 17656
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: England squad named
Almost certainly. If he can make a good run at 7, you'd have to say he's in better form than Underhill or TCurry. Good head-to-head this weekend.Scrumhead wrote:Interesting to see Simmonds has been picked at 7 for Exeter’s visit to Sale. Could that be anything to do with Eddie?
Puja
Backist Monk
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1694
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: England squad named
Other than being a starting Super Rugby 10/12 for the past couple of seasons? I think having players with experience in that kind of environment will be very valuable.TheNomad wrote:...not sure what Francis adds.Digby wrote:6 locks and 6 10s gives a sense the pack will not play at pace and the backs need to play with width. More to it than that, but in advance it doesn't look to have a natural balance.
-
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:19 am
Re: England squad named
Could the same not be said of Haskell? Neither is playing particularly well at present in the Premiership and that's surely the most important current benchmark.Adam_P wrote:Other than being a starting Super Rugby 10/12 for the past couple of seasons? I think having players with experience in that kind of environment will be very valuable.TheNomad wrote:...not sure what Francis adds.Digby wrote:6 locks and 6 10s gives a sense the pack will not play at pace and the backs need to play with width. More to it than that, but in advance it doesn't look to have a natural balance.
We're very well stocked in this squad at both the positions he covers and I doubt he'd be in the squad if were Te'o were fit.
At the same time, Marchant is looking great and could genuinely knock on the door the RWC
So yeah, I remain unsure
-
- Posts: 19102
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: England squad named
ha!Digby wrote:Or not, as the case may beBanquo wrote:Its basically fingers crossed Care and Youngs stay fit.
-
- Posts: 19102
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: England squad named
They are both much better locks than blindsidesOakboy wrote:Sorry 5P, posted at the same time. I don't think there are 6 locks. Lawes and/or Itoje are picked in their current positions based on numbers.fivepointer wrote:The idea of resting the Lions seems to have bitten the dust. Maybe a few will sit out the Samoa game.
I agree with most of the squad, but like others, do question the balance in one or two areas. Only 2 SH's strikes me as genuinely odd. Pity Maunder isnt fit as i'm sure he would have been included. 6 locks is overdoing it a bit.
i like the apprentice idea. Good to get these promising young players involved. Simmonds call up is very welcome.
Disappointed there's no Wilson or Armand.
Maybe, Eddie sees Lozowski as 12 back-up only because I can't see anyone starting at 10 other than Ford or Farrell. Should Ford get injured, Farrell is certain to start at 10, IMO.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6361
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: England squad named
I don't disagree but it looks as if Eddie will pick one of them at 6. Otherwise, why have Ewels or Isiekwe in the squad ahead of Armand, for example?Banquo wrote:They are both much better locks than blindsidesOakboy wrote:Sorry 5P, posted at the same time. I don't think there are 6 locks. Lawes and/or Itoje are picked in their current positions based on numbers.fivepointer wrote:The idea of resting the Lions seems to have bitten the dust. Maybe a few will sit out the Samoa game.
I agree with most of the squad, but like others, do question the balance in one or two areas. Only 2 SH's strikes me as genuinely odd. Pity Maunder isnt fit as i'm sure he would have been included. 6 locks is overdoing it a bit.
i like the apprentice idea. Good to get these promising young players involved. Simmonds call up is very welcome.
Disappointed there's no Wilson or Armand.
Maybe, Eddie sees Lozowski as 12 back-up only because I can't see anyone starting at 10 other than Ford or Farrell. Should Ford get injured, Farrell is certain to start at 10, IMO.
-
- Posts: 19102
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: England squad named
Its hardly a great plan, really. If one gets injured in training, which can happenPuja wrote:Yeah, I think that's our Plan A regardless of who trains with the squad. If one of them's injured, the other will play 75-80 minutes. If both are injured, we're stuffed no matter what we do.Banquo wrote:Its on the odd side, but has been for a while. Its basically fingers crossed Care and Youngs stay fit.
Puja

- Oakboy
- Posts: 6361
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: England squad named
Foden?Banquo wrote:Its hardly a great plan, really. If one gets injured in training, which can happenPuja wrote:Yeah, I think that's our Plan A regardless of who trains with the squad. If one of them's injured, the other will play 75-80 minutes. If both are injured, we're stuffed no matter what we do.Banquo wrote:Its on the odd side, but has been for a while. Its basically fingers crossed Care and Youngs stay fit.
Puja, what then?

-
- Posts: 19102
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: England squad named
Maro Itoje more likely.Oakboy wrote:Foden?Banquo wrote:Its hardly a great plan, really. If one gets injured in training, which can happenPuja wrote:
Yeah, I think that's our Plan A regardless of who trains with the squad. If one of them's injured, the other will play 75-80 minutes. If both are injured, we're stuffed no matter what we do.
Puja, what then?
-
- Posts: 12120
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: England squad named
Stick Ford there.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: England squad named
I'm amazed it doesn't come up more as an idea. It's nice that it doesn't, but it does surprise meMikey Brown wrote:Stick Ford there.
-
- Posts: 12120
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: England squad named
I thought it was universally acknowledged that if you're shorter than 5'10" you're only allowed to play scrum-half and perhaps hooker.