RugbyRebels

Ludlam has been consistently outplayed by all of his rivals for the shirt since the re-start though, and has not shown anywhere near as much influence on games.

Given the way in which Willis, but in particular Earl and Simmonds show up in attack, I can't see why he is more attack minded than them.

I honestly can’t believe we’re still having this argument.

Mellsblue wrote:I honestly can’t believe we’re still having this argument.

There's always someone who can't resist biting. I mean, quite often it's me, so it's understandable!

Puja

Digby wrote:What makes Ludlam more attack focussed? Is it something he's doing different/better in attack or that he's showing up less in defence which affects that balance?

lol.

I, too, am very interested in how Ludlam is more attacking.

A little alarm in my head is going off that you might be confusing him with someone else...

Curry is a top attacking flanker. I’m confused

morepork wrote:Assuming you mean T Curry, he looks about the most natural footballer in the entire side. I can't fathom why anyone would leave him out, other than sabotage.

I reckon tom curry is shit at football.

twitchy wrote:

morepork wrote:Assuming you mean T Curry, he looks about the most natural footballer in the entire side. I can't fathom why anyone would leave him out, other than sabotage.

I reckon tom curry is shit at football.

Yeah, Ben is the talented one with the boot. That's why Eddie hates him.

Cipriani and care were both in decent academies before they switched to rugby I think.

I wouldn’t call Sheffield Wednesday decent...

twitchy wrote:

morepork wrote:Assuming you mean T Curry, he looks about the most natural footballer in the entire side. I can't fathom why anyone would leave him out, other than sabotage.

I reckon tom curry is shit at football.

Tomato potato.

Stom wrote:I wouldn’t call Sheffield Wednesday decent...

Reminds of that terrific response from Neil Warnock, along the lines of if I was their manager as long as my contract was paid up I'd sign so many tossers they'd be screwed forever though come to think of it their current squad looks good for that

Digby wrote:

Stom wrote:I wouldn’t call Sheffield Wednesday decent...

Reminds of that terrific response from Neil Warnock, along the lines of if I was their manager as long as my contract was paid up I'd sign so many tossers they'd be screwed forever though come to think of it their current squad looks good for that

Good old Colin

So thats Willis then.

Earl awful quiet

padprop wrote:So thats Willis then.

Earl awful quiet

Has to be three from Willis, Curry, Underhill and Billy to start with the other on the bench.

Banquo wrote:

padprop wrote:So thats Willis then.

Earl awful quiet

Has to be three from Willis, Curry, Underhill and Billy to start with the other on the bench.

Not sure Billy’s form merits inclusion in squad let alone starting XV - good job Eddy’s blooded plenty of other quality test 8’s

Luckily form has long been a less than important factor

Mikey Brown wrote:

twitchy wrote:

morepork wrote:Assuming you mean T Curry, he looks about the most natural footballer in the entire side. I can't fathom why anyone would leave him out, other than sabotage.

I reckon tom curry is shit at football.

Yeah, Ben is the talented one with the boot. That's why Eddie hates him.

Both Curry brothers were in or around the Man City academy as centre backs before deciding that rugby was the sport for them.

jngf wrote:

Banquo wrote:

padprop wrote:So thats Willis then.

Earl awful quiet

Has to be three from Willis, Curry, Underhill and Billy to start with the other on the bench.

Not sure Billy’s form merits inclusion in squad let alone starting XV - good job Eddy’s blooded plenty of other quality test 8’s

And yet ironically you would include Ludlow on the ‘form’ he is showing.

jngf wrote:

Banquo wrote:

padprop wrote:So thats Willis then.

Earl awful quiet

Has to be three from Willis, Curry, Underhill and Billy to start with the other on the bench.

Not sure Billy’s form merits inclusion in squad let alone starting XV - good job Eddy’s blooded plenty of other quality test 8’s

Have you been watching Sarries games then?

jngf wrote:

Banquo wrote:

padprop wrote:So thats Willis then.

Earl awful quiet

Has to be three from Willis, Curry, Underhill and Billy to start with the other on the bench.

Not sure Billy’s form merits inclusion in squad let alone starting XV - good job Eddy’s blooded plenty of other quality test 8’s

Gloskarlos wrote:

jngf wrote:

Banquo wrote: Has to be three from Willis, Curry, Underhill and Billy to start with the other on the bench.

Not sure Billy’s form merits inclusion in squad let alone starting XV - good job Eddy’s blooded plenty of other quality test 8’s

And yet ironically you would include Ludlow on the ‘form’ he is showing.

I think you mean Ludlum sweetie!

jngf wrote:

Gloskarlos wrote:

jngf wrote:
Not sure Billy’s form merits inclusion in squad let alone starting XV - good job Eddy’s blooded plenty of other quality test 8’s

And yet ironically you would include Ludlow on the ‘form’ he is showing.

I think you mean Ludlum sweetie!

Do you mean Ludlam?

Ludlam indeed. Beyond Freudian that slip.