Page 49 of 308

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 6:57 pm
by Vengeful Glutton
morepork wrote:I have an obsession with robust sampling and reproducibility.

The obsession with weemin is yours Vegetable Mutton, it colours your narrative.
You have an obsession with me fido. Everytime I post you come scurrying in and bark.

Roll over.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 7:25 pm
by rowan
How many Muslim-majority countries on the list with the highest rape stats, I wondered? Answer - 0.

http://www.wonderslist.com/top-10-count ... pe-crimes/

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 7:59 pm
by morepork
Vengeful Glutton wrote:
morepork wrote:I have an obsession with robust sampling and reproducibility.

The obsession with weemin is yours Vegetable Mutton, it colours your narrative.
You have an obsession with me fido. Everytime I post you come scurrying in and bark.

Roll over.

You called Mutton chop?

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 8:01 pm
by morepork
rowan wrote:How many Muslim-majority countries on the list with the highest rape stats, I wondered? Answer - 0.

http://www.wonderslist.com/top-10-count ... pe-crimes/

Be wary of variability in reporting and definition between countries boss.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 8:06 pm
by Which Tyler
rowan wrote:How many Muslim-majority countries on the list with the highest rape stats, I wondered? Answer - 0.

http://www.wonderslist.com/top-10-count ... pe-crimes/
Not denying, but are we talking most raped people walking around, most sexually assaulted, or most reported.
Given that in some places, being raped is punishable by death-by-stoning; it may just be possible that it's not under-the-counter crime in those places.

Re: RE: Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 8:06 pm
by canta_brian
Vengeful Glutton wrote:
canta_brian wrote:

My post was in response to Lord Lucan's one suggesting that having women in power has lead to Sweden seeing becoming the rape capital of the world. Read his post again and if you agree with its misogyny then come out and say so. Don't hide behind the tragic deaths of some individual Swedish women to try and make a cheap point.
I think it's Scandinavian authorities that are concerned about the increase in rape incidences, and how it appears to be aligned with an increase in immigration, particularly from Muslim countries. Of course it could be an alt right conspiracy.

You boys have an obsession with labelling anyone who questions lax immigration policies as "misogynist". It's thrown about like it were confetti.
Read the article I posted. The reported rape rates don't seem to have changed much.

Almost seems to me that you think being raped by a Muslim immigrant is worse than being raped by an indigenous white inhabitant of a country. Misogynist? No. Racist? Yes, most certainly.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 8:09 pm
by Donny osmond
Jesus fucking Christ this thread is fair turning into a walk thru bigot's paradise.

Re: RE: Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 8:32 pm
by Vengeful Glutton
canta_brian wrote:
Vengeful Glutton wrote:
canta_brian wrote:

My post was in response to Lord Lucan's one suggesting that having women in power has lead to Sweden seeing becoming the rape capital of the world. Read his post again and if you agree with its misogyny then come out and say so. Don't hide behind the tragic deaths of some individual Swedish women to try and make a cheap point.
I think it's Scandinavian authorities that are concerned about the increase in rape incidences, and how it appears to be aligned with an increase in immigration, particularly from Muslim countries. Of course it could be an alt right conspiracy.

You boys have an obsession with labelling anyone who questions lax immigration policies as "misogynist". It's thrown about like it were confetti.
Read the article I posted. The reported rape rates don't seem to have changed much.

Almost seems to me that you think being raped by a Muslim immigrant is worse than being raped by an indigenous white inhabitant of a country. Misogynist? No. Racist? Yes, most certainly.
I read it. It's an opinion piece. You'll find other opinion pieces which contradict it.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 8:37 pm
by Vengeful Glutton
rowan wrote:How many Muslim-majority countries on the list with the highest rape stats, I wondered? Answer - 0.

http://www.wonderslist.com/top-10-count ... pe-crimes/
I'd be surprised if Rape in muslim countries is reported at all.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 8:43 pm
by rowan
Vengeful Glutton wrote:
rowan wrote:How many Muslim-majority countries on the list with the highest rape stats, I wondered? Answer - 0.

http://www.wonderslist.com/top-10-count ... pe-crimes/
I'd be surprised if Rape in muslim countries is reported at all.
That's a fairly sweeping generalization, VG, given there are about 50 Muslim-majority countries, totalling 1.5 billion people, or more than a fifth of the world's population. But I would agree with the basic premise that the list in that article reads more like a countdown of nations where rape is actually likely to be reported.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 8:56 pm
by Vengeful Glutton
rowan wrote:
Vengeful Glutton wrote:
rowan wrote:How many Muslim-majority countries on the list with the highest rape stats, I wondered? Answer - 0.

http://www.wonderslist.com/top-10-count ... pe-crimes/
I'd be surprised if Rape in muslim countries is reported at all.
That's a fairly sweeping generalization, VG, given there are about 50 Muslim-majority countries, totalling 1.5 billion people, or more than a fifth of the world's population. But I would agree with the basic premise that the list in that article reads more like a countdown of nations where rape is actually likely to be reported.
Incidences of rape have plummeted in the west, just look at the DOJ's webpage for stats on rape in the US. You're more likely to be raped in the US if you're incarcerated in a federal penitentiary. Personally I think Rape NGOs, and Quangos that are funded by the state apparatus are modifying the definition of rape to keep the stats from falling further. They don't want to lose out on sweet government subventions.

Is there any stats on rape in muslim countries? Diall it into google.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 9:22 pm
by morepork
I would be looking at peer reviewed studies for robust data that control for the sort of variables being raised here. Google is OK for a start point (sort of...) but you wouldn't want to base an hypothesis on it.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 9:29 pm
by Vengeful Glutton
morepork wrote:I would be looking at peer reviewed studies for robust data that control for the sort of variables being raised here. Google is OK for a start point (sort of...) but you wouldn't want to base an hypothesis on it.
It's strange that you weren't saying that when Rowan posted his link.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 9:32 pm
by Which Tyler
Vengeful Glutton wrote:
morepork wrote:I would be looking at peer reviewed studies for robust data that control for the sort of variables being raised here. Google is OK for a start point (sort of...) but you wouldn't want to base an hypothesis on it.
It's strange that you weren't saying that when Rowan posted his link.
Alt-facts don't work very well on the very same page as what was actually said.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 11:20 pm
by WaspInWales
It looks like Trump has had another busy day on Twitter.

It beggars belief that he gets away with his bullshit. Yes, the media call him out for it but at no point does the twat think twice about posting more crap.

He has spent today attacking McCain (not a bad thing I suppose), as well as attacking Sen. Blumenthal's military history.

All this from someone who avoided the draft any which way he could and has never put his country before himself.

He still won't release his tax returns either. Besides the avoidance of paying tax, they could reveal business interests which conflict with his position.

I'm also still waiting for him to sue all the women who claimed that he assaulted them. This was another promise prior to getting elected.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 11:34 pm
by WaspInWales

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 11:39 pm
by WaspInWales
What an epic cunt:

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 11:48 pm
by morepork
Vengeful Glutton wrote:
morepork wrote:I would be looking at peer reviewed studies for robust data that control for the sort of variables being raised here. Google is OK for a start point (sort of...) but you wouldn't want to base an hypothesis on it.
It's strange that you weren't saying that when Rowan posted his link.
I am saying it in response to that link you mutant.

Re: Trump

Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 11:54 pm
by WaspInWales
So, Trump will have to go to the Supreme Court now.

Is this just delaying the inevitable or is he likely to be tweeting in caps for a long time?

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2017 12:12 am
by morepork
WaspInWales wrote:So, Trump will have to go to the Supreme Court now.

Is this just delaying the inevitable or is he likely to be tweeting in caps for a long time?

How fucking thick is he? Surely he has seen miranda rights given on TV?


Let's hope the meeja keeps an eye on the background redistribution of power.

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2017 12:49 am
by cashead
Wow, I guess UG served a purpose after all. He kept all the apologists for fascism away. You disgusting pieces of shit.

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2017 3:20 am
by Lord Lucan
"The fascists of the future will be called anti-fascists" Winston Churchill, how right he was.

What a bad guy Trump is for trying to stem the tide of radical Islam, how dare he.

For all you radical muslim apologists, don't say you weren't warned, when you get the knock at the door, and are given the dreaded choice, convert or die.

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2017 4:36 am
by morepork
Lord Lucan wrote:"The fascists of the future will be called anti-fascists" Winston Churchill, how right he was.

What a bad guy Trump is for trying to stem the tide of radical Islam, how dare he.

For all you radical muslim apologists, don't say you weren't warned, when you get the knock at the door, and are given the dreaded choice, convert or die.
Oh for fucks sake. This is more likely to be Johovahs witness. Have you had a knock at the door?

Me neither. I'm more worried about anxious crackers operating under the banner of the NRA.

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2017 4:39 am
by cashead
Lord Lucan wrote:"The fascists of the future will be called anti-fascists" Winston Churchill, how right he was.

What a bad guy Trump is for trying to stem the tide of radical Islam, how dare he.

For all you radical muslim apologists, don't say you weren't warned, when you get the knock at the door, and are given the dreaded choice, convert or die.
Go choke on your own neckfat.

Re: Trump

Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2017 5:32 am
by Lord Lucan
I'd be happy to see an indefinite ban on muslims coming into Britain to settle, until they can get their house in order and learn to live in peace with other people. Not all muslims are radical I know, but until there is a foolproof method of determining who is radical and who isn't , it just isn't worth the risk to national security.
Incidentally, why do so many muslim countries have a permanent ban on Israelis entering their countries? Do they see them as a security risk or are they just being racist?

Hopefully this man gets into power in Holland next month.

And this lady, Europe needs them ASAP.