Re: England vs Australia 19th of Oct, 8.15am GMT
Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2019 8:14 am
Where is the Youngs/Farrell combo ranked in the 9/10 units of the quarter-finalists? Has any other country got a worse pairing?
The RugbyRebels Messageboard
http://rugbyrebels.club/
I am surprised.Digby wrote:Nowell has an injury, or so it's reportedBeasties wrote:Maybe Eddie's worried about the temptation for Faz to tackle Kerevi in the face and finally get that long-awaited red card.
Just noticed, what's happened to Nowell? He must really be worried about Slade's ability to last the game.
Thank god we took so many (injured) wingersMellsblue wrote:I am surprised.Digby wrote:Nowell has an injury, or so it's reportedBeasties wrote:Maybe Eddie's worried about the temptation for Faz to tackle Kerevi in the face and finally get that long-awaited red card.
Just noticed, what's happened to Nowell? He must really be worried about Slade's ability to last the game.
Genia/Toomua.Oakboy wrote:Where is the Youngs/Farrell combo ranked in the 9/10 units of the quarter-finalists? Has any other country got a worse pairing?
Indeed. He’s not trained this week.Digby wrote:Nowell has an injury, or so it's reportedBeasties wrote:Maybe Eddie's worried about the temptation for Faz to tackle Kerevi in the face and finally get that long-awaited red card.
Just noticed, what's happened to Nowell? He must really be worried about Slade's ability to last the game.
What a surprise. Never a risk taking such a robust player as Nowell......Epaminondas Pules wrote:Indeed. He’s not trained this week.Digby wrote:Nowell has an injury, or so it's reportedBeasties wrote:Maybe Eddie's worried about the temptation for Faz to tackle Kerevi in the face and finally get that long-awaited red card.
Just noticed, what's happened to Nowell? He must really be worried about Slade's ability to last the game.
I suspect most teams would take a punt on a British Lion.Banquo wrote:What a surprise. Never a risk taking such a robust player as Nowell......Epaminondas Pules wrote:Indeed. He’s not trained this week.Digby wrote:
Nowell has an injury, or so it's reported
I’ll give you one example. In training England were working on clearing their own rucks with a tackle of the competing (defensive) player. Lawes was absolutely excellent at it, as an aside. The premise of such was that it cleared our ball for the SH and also created a gap to exploit with the snipe. They took the drill into match scenarios and despite the tackle clear being used Danny Care failed to spot it over and over again having just been through it in the drills. That’s the kind of thing that marks your card with EJ, rightly or wrongly.Stom wrote:Just watched highlights of us vs Aus 2017. And, well, Danny Care off the bench was the game winner.
Set up 2, scored 1.
Why the flying fuck was he discarded...
Eddie Jones, you've pissed us all off again, just when we were coming round.
Well, I wouldn't with all the other injuries being carried in the backs, and given how easily he breaks and how long he'd been out for.Epaminondas Pules wrote:I suspect most teams would take a punt on a British Lion.Banquo wrote:What a surprise. Never a risk taking such a robust player as Nowell......Epaminondas Pules wrote:
Indeed. He’s not trained this week.
And he missed a couple of days of training apparently, my mistake. Wilson is back training but the impression is he’s still not quite right coupled with Ludlum playing well.
Interesting stuff. Eddie does have remarkable attention to that sort of detail. Maybe misses the bigger pictureEpaminondas Pules wrote:I’ll give you one example. In training England were working on clearing their own rucks with a tackle of the competing (defensive) player. Lawes was absolutely excellent at it, as an aside. The premise of such was that it cleared our ball for the SH and also created a gap to exploit with the snipe. They took the drill into match scenarios and despite the tackle clear being used Danny Care failed to spot it over and over again having just been through it in the drills. That’s the kind of thing that marks your card with EJ, rightly or wrongly.Stom wrote:Just watched highlights of us vs Aus 2017. And, well, Danny Care off the bench was the game winner.
Set up 2, scored 1.
Why the flying fuck was he discarded...
Eddie Jones, you've pissed us all off again, just when we were coming round.
I can see why it would mark his card but his performances on the field haven’t justified being dropped, especially for an average player like Heinz. It’s even more a surprise given that Care is our best sniping 9, tackle clear or no tackle clear. I’m also wondering whether the forwards, Lawes aside, have mastered it given the defence of Youngs’ ponderous play and poor passing is often explained away by poor ball presentation.Epaminondas Pules wrote:I’ll give you one example. In training England were working on clearing their own rucks with a tackle of the competing (defensive) player. Lawes was absolutely excellent at it, as an aside. The premise of such was that it cleared our ball for the SH and also created a gap to exploit with the snipe. They took the drill into match scenarios and despite the tackle clear being used Danny Care failed to spot it over and over again having just been through it in the drills. That’s the kind of thing that marks your card with EJ, rightly or wrongly.Stom wrote:Just watched highlights of us vs Aus 2017. And, well, Danny Care off the bench was the game winner.
Set up 2, scored 1.
Why the flying fuck was he discarded...
Eddie Jones, you've pissed us all off again, just when we were coming round.
Care's omission sounds like a classic case of judging a player only on what he can't do rather than on what he can. I'd be happy for Care and Cipriani to be starting on Saturday, or Spencer and Cipriani, or Care and Ford, or Spencer and Ford.Mellsblue wrote:I can see why it would mark his card but his performances on the field haven’t justified being dropped, especially for an average player like Heinz. It’s even more a surprise given that Care is our best sniping 9, tackle clear or no tackle clear. I’m also wondering whether the forwards, Lawes aside, have mastered it given the defence of Youngs’ ponderous play and poor passing is often explained away by poor ball presentation.Epaminondas Pules wrote:I’ll give you one example. In training England were working on clearing their own rucks with a tackle of the competing (defensive) player. Lawes was absolutely excellent at it, as an aside. The premise of such was that it cleared our ball for the SH and also created a gap to exploit with the snipe. They took the drill into match scenarios and despite the tackle clear being used Danny Care failed to spot it over and over again having just been through it in the drills. That’s the kind of thing that marks your card with EJ, rightly or wrongly.Stom wrote:Just watched highlights of us vs Aus 2017. And, well, Danny Care off the bench was the game winner.
Set up 2, scored 1.
Why the flying fuck was he discarded...
Eddie Jones, you've pissed us all off again, just when we were coming round.
Which combo is that?Peej wrote:Don't forget Robson on that list.
Just don't understand why you play a combo that's never played together in a World Cup quarter final, let alone one that makes glaring omissions based on the quality of discarded options.
The last sentence is the crux, especially if you take in to account the ‘finishers’ shtick. As flawed as Care is, I’d argue he’s no more flawed than Youngs.Banquo wrote:On Care its tricky; its not long ago heads were in hands at the brain farts he'd quite regularly have, which often outweighed his excellent natural ability. However, he still seems a much better bench option than Heinz.......
Haha. Of course that’s the big talking point.jngf wrote:We’re in for a bumpy ride if Billy is significantly less than 100% fit - don’t like the idea at all of Curry being our back up 8. Even less like the idea of Farrell at 10 mind you
The Farrell, Tuilagi, Slade combo. As far as I know they've not turned out together before. Let alone the fact that Manu has looked back to being close to his best at 13, and that Farrell has looked far worse than Ford at 10Banquo wrote:Which combo is that?Peej wrote:Don't forget Robson on that list.
Just don't understand why you play a combo that's never played together in a World Cup quarter final, let alone one that makes glaring omissions based on the quality of discarded options.
Didn't Farrell, Tuilagi, and Slade play the entire 6N? I mean, I still don't like it, but that's because we're dropping Ford and moving Tuilagi out of his most dangerous position, rather than because it' inexperienced.Peej wrote:The Farrell, Tuilagi, Slade combo. As far as I know they've not turned out together before. Let alone the fact that Manu has looked back to being close to his best at 13, and that Farrell has looked far worse than Ford at 10Banquo wrote:Which combo is that?Peej wrote:Don't forget Robson on that list.
Just don't understand why you play a combo that's never played together in a World Cup quarter final, let alone one that makes glaring omissions based on the quality of discarded options.
they played all the 6N bar Italy. I wouldn't pick them mind, esp given the end to the 6NPeej wrote:The Farrell, Tuilagi, Slade combo. As far as I know they've not turned out together before. Let alone the fact that Manu has looked back to being close to his best at 13, and that Farrell has looked far worse than Ford at 10Banquo wrote:Which combo is that?Peej wrote:Don't forget Robson on that list.
Just don't understand why you play a combo that's never played together in a World Cup quarter final, let alone one that makes glaring omissions based on the quality of discarded options.