RugbyRebels

Lord Lucan wrote:They were the two candidate's, it was one or the other, I'd have Trump over the hag Clinton any day.
Many people are being misled by the media campaign against Trump, no matter what he does they are portraying it as wrong, CNN are getting hysterical on every matter, and every tweet concerning Trump, the BBC is just as bad. It is literally a hate campaign.
You are buying into this hysteria when you take about consequences which are affecting millions of people, Obama and Clintons actions in the middle east affected millions of people, by taking out Gadaffi, and trying to topple Assad, yet everyone seems cool about that.
At the moment Trumps actions are affecting illegal immigrants, I see that as a good thing, so do millions of hard working Americans. His actions to thwart the tide of migrants from war torn and terror ridden countries, have been foiled by liberal judge's who have stopped him from doing what he he is empowered to do.

Stop being fooled, and stop being so hysterical, and I don't mean just you personally, no one said a word when Obama introduced a ban on people coming from a muslim country, did anyone complain? no, Trump does it, and what do we have, mass hysteria, its double standards, and it stinks.

WaspInWales wrote:

Lord Lucan wrote:They were the two candidate's, it was one or the other, I'd have Trump over the hag Clinton any day.
Many people are being misled by the media campaign against Trump, no matter what he does they are portraying it as wrong, CNN are getting hysterical on every matter, and every tweet concerning Trump, the BBC is just as bad. It is literally a hate campaign.
You are buying into this hysteria when you take about consequences which are affecting millions of people, Obama and Clintons actions in the middle east affected millions of people, by taking out Gadaffi, and trying to topple Assad, yet everyone seems cool about that.
At the moment Trumps actions are affecting illegal immigrants, I see that as a good thing, so do millions of hard working Americans. His actions to thwart the tide of migrants from war torn and terror ridden countries, have been foiled by liberal judge's who have stopped him from doing what he he is empowered to do.

Stop being fooled, and stop being so hysterical, and I don't mean just you personally, no one said a word when Obama introduced a ban on people coming from a muslim country, did anyone complain? no, Trump does it, and what do we have, mass hysteria, its double standards, and it stinks.

So, visa and green card holders are illegal immigrants now?

Clearly many hard working Americans disagree with you and Trump as can be seen by the protests.

Also, where else are migrants from war torn and terror ridden countries supposed to go? Perhaps if the US, UK and others didn't invade these countries in order to control their resources and impose their own style of 'democracy', there wouldn't be as many people trying to escape the horrors. Granted previous administrations are responsible for much of the mess but I guarantee Trump will continue to bomb the fuck out these places.

It sounds like you think everyone wishing to leave Syria, Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Yemen, Libya and Somalia in order to preserve their life and the lives of their loved ones must be a terrorist. Seems a little hysterical no?

If I lived somewhere where bombs were raining down on me all day, I'd want to get the fuck out of there and head somewhere safe.

Lord Lucan wrote:

WaspInWales wrote:

Lord Lucan wrote:You wish! No matter how much noise libtards make, Trump is here to stay, your side lost the election get over it already. Everyone gets upset when their side loses, but this is getting ridiculous now.
This must be the longest, the loudest, the most demented hissy fit of all time by a losing side. What was so good about Obama's reign? what were the positives? yet you wanted that reign to continue under Clinton. That regime is responsible for blowing open the middle east, causing the migrant crisis, great show Obama & Co, now go away, stop stamping your feet, and let the adults try and clear up your mess.

You seem to be confusing opposition to Trump to support for Clinton and that is just ridiculous.

Not many people here supported Clinton.

Trump is a bigoted moron and whilst his actions are providing quite a few lol moments, they have far reaching consequences which are affecting millions of people, including masses in the US.

Never before has a US president had such criticism, low approval ratings and equally low intelligence whilst at the same time as trying to convince the world he is the best at everything.

He makes Dubya look like a genius and Kim Jong-Il's 11 holes in one on the way to carding a 38 under par look almost believable in comparison to Trump's claims!

They were the two candidate's, it was one or the other, I'd have Trump over the hag Clinton any day.
Many people are being misled by the media campaign against Trump, no matter what he does they are portraying it as wrong, CNN are getting hysterical on every matter, and every tweet concerning Trump, the BBC is just as bad. It is literally a hate campaign.
You are buying into this hysteria when you take about consequences which are affecting millions of people, Obama and Clintons actions in the middle east affected millions of people, by taking out Gadaffi, and trying to topple Assad, yet everyone seems cool about that.
At the moment Trumps actions are affecting illegal immigrants, I see that as a good thing, so do millions of hard working Americans. His actions to thwart the tide of migrants from war torn and terror ridden countries, have been foiled by liberal judge's who have stopped him from doing what he he is empowered to do.

Stop being fooled, and stop being so hysterical, and I don't mean just you personally, no one said a word when Obama introduced a ban on people coming from a muslim country, did anyone complain? no, Trump does it, and what do we have, mass hysteria, its double standards, and it stinks.

morepork wrote:Actor?

Have you seen Trump on Wrestlemania?

Lord Lucan wrote:If you libtards are so desperate to see refugees "safe" why not volunteer your house as a safe haven? take as many in as you can, just contact your local MP, I'm sure they could help.
Most of the tide heading to Europe and the Americas are fake refugees, they are economic migrants. They are safe as soon as they enter Turkey, do they want to stay? no, they are safe when they enter Greece, do they want to stay? no, and this goes on and on through, Bulgaria, Hungary, Croatia, etc, etc, wait for it, yes, until they get to the likes of Germany, Sweden and the UK, and others, who will give them free housing, free food, and free money.
They want more than safety boys, they want to be looked after as well as they can possibly be, otherwise why do they bypass all these other countries, contrary to the refugee act which says they should seek sanctuary in the first "safe" country they come to.

Like I said if you feel for them, then take some in, take some of the "child" refugees from Calais, wouldn't it be a libtards dream to do this???

morepork wrote:Liberal use of libtards by a fucktard who tries too hard.

You are a walking cliche.

Mikey Brown wrote:

morepork wrote:Liberal use of libtards by a fucktard who tries too hard.

You are a walking cliche.

Have you ever considered a rap career?

Lord Lucan wrote:If you libtards are so desperate to see refugees "safe" why not volunteer your house as a safe haven? take as many in as you can, just contact your local MP, I'm sure they could help.
Most of the tide heading to Europe and the Americas are fake refugees, they are economic migrants. They are safe as soon as they enter Turkey, do they want to stay? no, they are safe when they enter Greece, do they want to stay? no, and this goes on and on through, Bulgaria, Hungary, Croatia, etc, etc, wait for it, yes, until they get to the likes of Germany, Sweden and the UK, and others, who will give them free housing, free food, and free money.
They want more than safety boys, they want to be looked after as well as they can possibly be, otherwise why do they bypass all these other countries, contrary to the refugee act which says they should seek sanctuary in the first "safe" country they come to.

Like I said if you feel for them, then take some in, take some of the "child" refugees from Calais, wouldn't it be a libtards dream to do this???

morepork wrote:Actor?

Have you seen Trump on Wrestlemania?

morepork wrote:Kids:

Think before you Tweet.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.2972830

" Twitter user Lib Hypocrisy praised Conway’s “strength,” “resiliency” and considered her as an inspiration. The counselor to the President then retweeted the post and said “Love you back” while also wishing a happy Valentine’s day to her “Hapless Haters.”

Lib Hypocrisy’s Twitter description features the hashtags #WhiteIdentity, #Nationalist and her declaration of love for Trump chief strategist Steve Bannon and Geert Wilders, an anti-Muslim Dutch politician who was found guilty of discrimination in December."

Screen shot 2017-02-16 at 12.04.02 PM.png

Classic. It just keeps on giving.

Sandydragon wrote:

morepork wrote:Kids:

Think before you Tweet.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa ... -1.2972830

" Twitter user Lib Hypocrisy praised Conway’s “strength,” “resiliency” and considered her as an inspiration. The counselor to the President then retweeted the post and said “Love you back” while also wishing a happy Valentine’s day to her “Hapless Haters.”

Lib Hypocrisy’s Twitter description features the hashtags #WhiteIdentity, #Nationalist and her declaration of love for Trump chief strategist Steve Bannon and Geert Wilders, an anti-Muslim Dutch politician who was found guilty of discrimination in December."

Screen shot 2017-02-16 at 12.04.02 PM.png

Classic. It just keeps on giving.

If the rumours have any substance, Conway could well be the next White House Chief of Staff.

WaspInWales wrote:I just love how he keeps attacking the press and blaming everyone else:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38998362

cashead wrote:

WaspInWales wrote:I just love how he keeps attacking the press and blaming everyone else:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-38998362

He has to, because he needs to try to maintain the narrative he's built for his followers. Therefore, when he or his team get caught out on an inconsistency or a lie, or if something they tried to discredit gets even partially verified (like the Russian dossier, which stated Trump was a pissboy), it's all part of a grand conspiracy against them and the "deplorables."

Which Tyler wrote:Apparently Producers on MSNBC and CNN are refusing to book Kelly Ann Conway on their shows due to her repeated falsehoods and misinformation. They are calling her a non credible source.