Re: If Russia invades Ukraine (more)...
Posted: Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:38 pm
I'd like to know how far our stock of weapons has been depleted since the start of the Ukraine war and how much (if any) our rate of production has increased.
The RugbyRebels Messageboard
http://rugbyrebels.club/
I'd guess a lot and not at all given the state of public finances and how asleep we and the rest of europe have been at the wheel on defence.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:38 pm I'd like to know how far our stock of weapons has been depleted since the start of the Ukraine war and how much (if any) our rate of production has increased.
Probably a fair assessment. Clearly we need an Euro defence pact, perhaps with Canada, since the US now has other priorities.Banquo wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 11:06 amI'd guess a lot and not at all given the state of public finances and how asleep we and the rest of europe have been at the wheel on defence.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:38 pm I'd like to know how far our stock of weapons has been depleted since the start of the Ukraine war and how much (if any) our rate of production has increased.
From a Ukrainian perspective, based on current reporting:Puja wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:15 pmIt's because he dared to answer back, even if only mildly.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 4:26 pm https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/ ... atest-news
[H2]Trump calls Zelenskyy a 'dictator without elections'[/H2]
We have more detail on Donald Trump's Truth Social post:
Trump called Zelenskyy a "dictator without elections" after the Ukrainian leader earlier on Wednesday accused Trump of being trapped in a "disinformation bubble."
[H2]Zelenskyy 'better move fast' or he won't have a country left - Trump[/H2]
In a Truth Social post Donald Trump wrote Ukraine's Zelenskyy "better move fast" or he won't have a country left. Trump added that Zelenskyy had "done a terrible job" and called him a dictator "without elections".
With friends like these...
At this point, is there any merit to paying attention to the US-Russia "peace talks"? The US won't give any more money or equipment to Ukraine regardless, so there's not really much pressure that they can put on Ukraine. Given that, what weight do the terms of a Putin-Trump deal carry?
Puja
I hope that - even if no more funding became available - at the very least there was some reallocation of resources so that weapons given to Ukraine in large amounts (eg anti-tank weapons in the early days) have been prioritized and produced or procured at an accelerated rate.Sandydragon wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 2:12 pmProbably a fair assessment. Clearly we need an Euro defence pact, perhaps with Canada, since the US now has other priorities.Banquo wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 11:06 amI'd guess a lot and not at all given the state of public finances and how asleep we and the rest of europe have been at the wheel on defence.Son of Mathonwy wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:38 pm I'd like to know how far our stock of weapons has been depleted since the start of the Ukraine war and how much (if any) our rate of production has increased.
With Russian and US guarantees of future security being utterly worthless they'll fight on for as long as there are able.Puja wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 3:57 pm Can only imagine they'll choose to fight on in that situation. Europe will still be keen to support and, even though Ukraine is nowhere near the same force without the USA backing them, they can fight a defensive war that'll be absolutely horrendous for Russia to deal with, and hope the international situation changes given time.
Puja
Russias economy is going down the toilet. The problem will probably be that if trumps deal isn’t accepted, he will probably look to unlock most of the sanctions in place which will be even more unhelpful for Ukraine.Puja wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 3:57 pm Can only imagine they'll choose to fight on in that situation. Europe will still be keen to support and, even though Ukraine is nowhere near the same force without the USA backing them, they can fight a defensive war that'll be absolutely horrendous for Russia to deal with, and hope the international situation changes given time.
Puja
Yeah, that's the major return that Russia will be wanting from their investment - all sanctions lifted to boost the economy and interference with any kind of European assistance (given that a chunk of the technology our militaries rely upon assume a bare minimum of American compliance, let alone active obstruction).Sandydragon wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2025 7:18 pmRussias economy is going down the toilet. The problem will probably be that if trumps deal isn’t accepted, he will probably look to unlock most of the sanctions in place which will be even more unhelpful for Ukraine.Puja wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2025 3:57 pm Can only imagine they'll choose to fight on in that situation. Europe will still be keen to support and, even though Ukraine is nowhere near the same force without the USA backing them, they can fight a defensive war that'll be absolutely horrendous for Russia to deal with, and hope the international situation changes given time.
Puja
Shame Trump isn't getting any advice like that. Not that he would listen.Mellsblue wrote: ↑Sun Feb 23, 2025 11:23 am Worth a listen. Sir Alex Younger, head of MI6 between 2014 and 2020, on News Night.
https://x.com/nicholadrummond/status/18 ... MV3j-SK8yQ
Wonder if he's giving Intel to the Russians yet. No doubt he already has, informally, to Putin.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 9:00 am Edging towards the worst case scenario
Donald Trump has now banned UK from sharing any US military intelligence with Ukraine
Donald Trump, the US President, has already temporarily halted American military aid to Ukraine, a decision which sparked fears the country could soon run out of weapons
Trump said he had a "great" phone call with Putin last month, and the Russian president sent him a portrait as a gift a week later.
What a piece of shit. Who knows what's going on in his head, but unfortunately, no matter the random shit that comes out of his mouth he's clearly out to make whatever short-term monetary gain he can, no matter the price anyone else has to pay. I was (and continue to be) surprised that he resumed assistance for Ukraine, but perhaps he realizes that total victory for Russia will not likely lead to the peace prize he wants.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Tue Apr 15, 2025 9:42 am Trump blames Zelensky for starting war after massive Russian attack
...
"You don't start a war against someone 20 times your size and then hope that people give you some missiles," he told reporters at the White House, also blaming former US President Joe Biden for the conflict.
Guess his boss had a chat again just before speaking to the press
ETA:Trump said he had a "great" phone call with Putin last month, and the Russian president sent him a portrait as a gift a week later.