Next up, Ireland

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Digby »

Sadly Goode is let down by having the athletic ability of Rab C Nesbitt
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9185
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Which Tyler »

Raggs wrote:I can imagine May being extremely chatty. I just can't imagine the 10 being that interested in the latest adventures of his cranial chicken, the goings on in the crowd, or whatever treasures he's just found up his nostrils.
Image
Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Timbo »

Farrell is obviously known as being a particularly excellent communicator, Daly is also definitely a talker, and May and Tuilagi are both very experienced and have played tonnes of rugby with these inside backs- Youngs, Ford and Farrell.

Communication wouldn’t be an especially big concern of mine with this backline.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Oakboy »

I think the problem with this team is in decision-making rather than communication. Kicking with no chase may be an example of both, mind.
loudnconfident
Posts: 348
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:46 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by loudnconfident »

Oakboy wrote:It's obvious what will happen early in the second half. Francis and Joseph will come on for Tuilagi and Ford. Farrell will move to 10 no matter what the state of the game.

The team is Ok apart from Farrell at 12 though I think Launchbury is unlucky if this means he is only 4th choice lock.

Of course, one unintended consequence and the odd injury in a few games time could see Slade at 12 and Tuilagi at 13, my favourite centre pairing.
(reply to all, really, rather than just Oakboy)

i think you're all being a bit harsh. As other posters have stated, this selection is a real step forward. Don't forget, we have the AIs, then next year's 6N such that we can bed the partnerships down before the 2020 RWC in Japan.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14563
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Mellsblue »

loudnconfident wrote:
Oakboy wrote:It's obvious what will happen early in the second half. Francis and Joseph will come on for Tuilagi and Ford. Farrell will move to 10 no matter what the state of the game.

The team is Ok apart from Farrell at 12 though I think Launchbury is unlucky if this means he is only 4th choice lock.

Of course, one unintended consequence and the odd injury in a few games time could see Slade at 12 and Tuilagi at 13, my favourite centre pairing.
(reply to all, really, rather than just Oakboy)

i think you're all being a bit harsh. As other posters have stated, this selection is a real step forward. Don't forget, we have the AIs, then next year's 6N such that we can bed the partnerships down before the 2020 RWC in Japan.
Ha. Very good.
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 1986
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Spiffy »

Timbo wrote:Farrell is obviously known as being a particularly excellent communicator, Daly is also definitely a talker, and May and Tuilagi are both very experienced and have played tonnes of rugby with these inside backs- Youngs, Ford and Farrell.

Communication wouldn’t be an especially big concern of mine with this backline.
Yes. They could all talk for England. Now the rugby.............
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9185
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Which Tyler »

Any new injury announcements yet?
User avatar
oldbackrow
Posts: 281
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:46 pm
Location: Darkest Rotherham
Contact:

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by oldbackrow »

Which Tyler wrote:Any new injury announcements yet?
Just been announced, Underhill and Curry are both going to miss the Ireland game.

They're not injured its just EJ playing mind games! ;)
WaspInWales
Posts: 3623
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by WaspInWales »

oldbackrow wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:Any new injury announcements yet?
Just been announced, Underhill and Curry are both going to miss the Ireland game.

They're not injured its just EJ playing mind games! ;)
Eddie has cloned Farrell twice so we're sorted! :lol:

Hang on...if he can clone Faz twice, what could 15 Faz's do? Fuck that, 23 Farrells!

Eddie, spit some Farrell DNA into a Petri dish...quick! :D
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Digby »

WaspInWales wrote:
oldbackrow wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:Any new injury announcements yet?
Just been announced, Underhill and Curry are both going to miss the Ireland game.

They're not injured its just EJ playing mind games! ;)
Eddie has cloned Farrell twice so we're sorted! :lol:

Hang on...if he can clone Faz twice, what could 15 Faz's do? Fuck that, 23 Farrells!

Eddie, spit some Farrell DNA into a Petri dish...quick! :D
You think Eddie goes that far in his fluffing of Farrell?
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Digby »

Timbo wrote:Farrell is obviously known as being a particularly excellent communicator, Daly is also definitely a talker, and May and Tuilagi are both very experienced and have played tonnes of rugby with these inside backs- Youngs, Ford and Farrell.

Communication wouldn’t be an especially big concern of mine with this backline.
There's a world of difference between players who've played lots of games, and players who identify potential targets and communicate as well as say Conrad Smith. I'm not saying the players in this side don't do that, it's just not apparent to me who does. And Daly might be more use talking to his 10 from the wing than from 15, 15s aren't irrelevant, but they'd seem to me lesser than the 12, 13, 11 and 14 for communicating ideas back toward the 10

And I don't watch England at get the impression there's much communication, it all seems to stay on script more than makes sense
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14563
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Mellsblue »

I’d say there is no one in the team who has a better vantage point on the pitch than the 15. I used to demand mine talk to me, even if 90% of the info was useless.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Oakboy »

Mellsblue wrote:I’d say there is no one in the team who has a better vantage point on the pitch than the 15. I used to demand mine talk to me, even if 90% of the info was useless.
The trouble is that if you were at 15 and not especially good nobody listened to a word you said. In fact, I used to get basic instructions at the top of the captain's voice, such as 'catch it', 'kick it', 'don't fucking kick it', 'run it' etc., usually followed by 'I don't know why I wasted my breath'.
Timbo
Posts: 2259
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Timbo »

Digby wrote:
Timbo wrote:Farrell is obviously known as being a particularly excellent communicator, Daly is also definitely a talker, and May and Tuilagi are both very experienced and have played tonnes of rugby with these inside backs- Youngs, Ford and Farrell.

Communication wouldn’t be an especially big concern of mine with this backline.
There's a world of difference between players who've played lots of games, and players who identify potential targets and communicate as well as say Conrad Smith. I'm not saying the players in this side don't do that, it's just not apparent to me who does. And Daly might be more use talking to his 10 from the wing than from 15, 15s aren't irrelevant, but they'd seem to me lesser than the 12, 13, 11 and 14 for communicating ideas back toward the 10

And I don't watch England at get the impression there's much communication, it all seems to stay on script more than makes sense
I agree that the sort of communication you’re talking about is a hugely under rated skill and of vital importance.

Beyond a vague impression, and second hand anecdotes etc, it’s almost impossible to know how good this back line is in that area. It’s something you can only know from playing with someone really. Personally, it’s not a huge concern of mine looking at this particular set of players.
Digby
Posts: 13436
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Digby »

Timbo wrote:
Digby wrote:
Timbo wrote:Farrell is obviously known as being a particularly excellent communicator, Daly is also definitely a talker, and May and Tuilagi are both very experienced and have played tonnes of rugby with these inside backs- Youngs, Ford and Farrell.

Communication wouldn’t be an especially big concern of mine with this backline.
There's a world of difference between players who've played lots of games, and players who identify potential targets and communicate as well as say Conrad Smith. I'm not saying the players in this side don't do that, it's just not apparent to me who does. And Daly might be more use talking to his 10 from the wing than from 15, 15s aren't irrelevant, but they'd seem to me lesser than the 12, 13, 11 and 14 for communicating ideas back toward the 10

And I don't watch England at get the impression there's much communication, it all seems to stay on script more than makes sense
I agree that the sort of communication you’re talking about is a hugely under rated skill and of vital importance.

Beyond a vague impression, and second hand anecdotes etc, it’s almost impossible to know how good this back line is in that area. It’s something you can only know from playing with someone really. Personally, it’s not a huge concern of mine looking at the players we have with this particular set of players.
It is a concern of mine when we do seem to stick to the script as provided by Eddie, when surely there must be chances in games when opposition teams are resourced badly or have some turned in/out shoulders, and then almost no one in this backline seems to be a thinker on the game of rugby beyond Ford and Farrell, who are both very good, but are also both close in.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9185
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Which Tyler »

Which Tyler wrote:Any new injury announcements yet?
JJ out, Marchant in

Marchant not Watson? Granted he's the closest like-for-like with JJ, but not going to Japan versus going to Japan? When we'd rather play a hooker on the flank than draft in a flanker?
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14563
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Mellsblue »

It doesn’t matter how many times I see or read it, I can’t get over Heinz being our second choice 9.
User avatar
Which Tyler
Posts: 9185
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
Location: Tewkesbury
Contact:

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Which Tyler »

Streams?
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14563
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Mellsblue »

Could Farrell not have dotted that ball with foot out for a scrum in Ire 22?
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Oakboy »

Kick away turnover ball - bloody Farrell. Then an early tackle missed by ref. Bad start.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14563
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Mellsblue »

Oakboy wrote:Kick away turnover ball - bloody Farrell. Then an early tackle missed by ref. Bad start.
Was it not Ford....from slow turnover ball, into open space that we regained?
badback
Posts: 199
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:42 pm

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by badback »

Which Tyler wrote:Streams?
Found any?
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14563
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Mellsblue »

badback wrote:
Which Tyler wrote:Streams?
Found any?
NOW TV - £9
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Next up, Ireland

Post by Oakboy »

Mellsblue wrote:
Oakboy wrote:Kick away turnover ball - bloody Farrell. Then an early tackle missed by ref. Bad start.
Was it not Ford....from slow turnover ball, into open space that we regained?
Could have been. Bloody Ford, then.
Post Reply