I would also suggest France, perhaps, got it tactically wrong against us. Allowing us too much freedom. Nonetheless a bloody enjoyable game that onefivepointer wrote:121 pts conceded. A 6N's record. Plus 67 penalties conceded.
Its been pretty bad. One standout performance against France cannot hide the fact that we've been off the pace.
We need to talk about Eddie...
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
-
- Posts: 5916
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
More or less the same group of players reached a WC final 18 months ago.Banquo wrote:I've held back, but its worse than that. There is a fundamental set of problems with the playing personnel imo. I think its about collective rugby intelligence as much as anything.fivepointer wrote:121 pts conceded. A 6N's record. Plus 67 penalties conceded.
Its been pretty bad. One standout performance against France cannot hide the fact that we've been off the pace.
How can we go from general excellence in 2019 to wretched underachievers now. Why are our players making so many dull errors and poor decisions?
-
- Posts: 19217
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
I give up, why? They have been monumentally stupid in 4 of the last 5 games.fivepointer wrote:More or less the same group of players reached a WC final 18 months ago.Banquo wrote:I've held back, but its worse than that. There is a fundamental set of problems with the playing personnel imo. I think its about collective rugby intelligence as much as anything.fivepointer wrote:121 pts conceded. A 6N's record. Plus 67 penalties conceded.
Its been pretty bad. One standout performance against France cannot hide the fact that we've been off the pace.
How can we go from general excellence in 2019 to wretched underachievers now. Why are our players making so many dull errors and poor decisions?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
Is this worse than the last 6N implosion? I’m going for yes as I think it’s macro rather than specific issues that can be remedied. My only mitigating factor is that the Sarries players, who form the spine of the team, are clearly miles off their game.
-
- Posts: 19217
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
Yes. Our discipline has been appalling all the way through- the forwards have generally been uber dim, and there is no leadership.Mellsblue wrote:Is this worse than the last 6N implosion? I’m going for yes as I think it’s macro rather than specific issues that can be remedied. My only mitigating factor is that the Sarries players, who form the spine of the team, are clearly miles off their game.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
2018 6n our fitness was smashed as Eddie said it would be. Not seen something similar this time.
-
- Posts: 19217
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
we've looked unfit I think, but not by design.Raggs wrote:2018 6n our fitness was smashed as Eddie said it would be. Not seen something similar this time.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
I worry about leadership from top to bottom. They look like a very confused team..... even the individuals who you’d class as intelligent players (of whom there isn’t enough).Banquo wrote:Yes. Our discipline has been appalling all the way through- the forwards have generally been uber dim, and there is no leadership.Mellsblue wrote:Is this worse than the last 6N implosion? I’m going for yes as I think it’s macro rather than specific issues that can be remedied. My only mitigating factor is that the Sarries players, who form the spine of the team, are clearly miles off their game.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6402
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
There was no compulsion to pick any of them.Mellsblue wrote:Is this worse than the last 6N implosion? I’m going for yes as I think it’s macro rather than specific issues that can be remedied. My only mitigating factor is that the Sarries players, who form the spine of the team, are clearly miles off their game.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
Other than them being some of the best EQP players.Oakboy wrote:There was no compulsion to pick any of them.Mellsblue wrote:Is this worse than the last 6N implosion? I’m going for yes as I think it’s macro rather than specific issues that can be remedied. My only mitigating factor is that the Sarries players, who form the spine of the team, are clearly miles off their game.
-
- Posts: 2640
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
Yes, only other than Itoje, they've proved that they aren't up to speed any more. All of these could come in from the bench
Mako - Obano
George - Dunn
Billy - Dombrandt, Mercer, hell look at Barbeary
Farrell - anyone
Daly - Malins
Mako - Obano
George - Dunn
Billy - Dombrandt, Mercer, hell look at Barbeary
Farrell - anyone
Daly - Malins
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6402
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
Potentially, but are they the best or were they?Mellsblue wrote:Other than them being some of the best EQP players.Oakboy wrote:There was no compulsion to pick any of them.Mellsblue wrote:Is this worse than the last 6N implosion? I’m going for yes as I think it’s macro rather than specific issues that can be remedied. My only mitigating factor is that the Sarries players, who form the spine of the team, are clearly miles off their game.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6402
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
I suggest a re-think on the No 8 position is fundamental to improving the team unit.Danno wrote:Yes, only other than Itoje, they've proved that they aren't up to speed any more. All of these could come in from the bench
Mako - Obano
George - Dunn
Billy - Dombrandt, Mercer, hell look at Barbeary
Farrell - anyone
Daly - Malins
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
I doubt some of those are upgrades* plus the Sarries players have mostly earned some leeway with past performances.Danno wrote:Yes, only other than Itoje, they've proved that they aren't up to speed any more. All of these could come in from the bench
Mako - Obano
George - Dunn
Billy - Dombrandt, Mercer, hell look at Barbeary
Farrell - anyone
Daly - Malins
*Mako > Obano
George > Dunn
Billy > unproven talent... happy to look at upgrades but wouldn’t say they’re def, or even probably, better at present.
Farrell > anyone (England’s IC options, quality and quantity, is poor)
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
Who are your replacements? I’m a sceptic, said previously that they’re off the pace, but most of them have earned some leeway and I’m not sure there are obvious upgrades.Oakboy wrote:Potentially, but are they the best or were they?Mellsblue wrote:Other than them being some of the best EQP players.Oakboy wrote:
There was no compulsion to pick any of them.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6402
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
Fair point. I think we could do worse than pick the best of Exeter/Bristol in every position unless there is no EQ availability or a substantial case for not so doing. Or, as Jones has done, we could sacrifice the 6N on the back of club players relegated for financial disciplinary reasons.Mellsblue wrote:Who are your replacements? I’m a sceptic, said previously that they’re off the pace, but most of them have earned some leeway and I’m not sure there are obvious upgrades.Oakboy wrote:Potentially, but are they the best or were they?Mellsblue wrote: Other than them being some of the best EQP players.
Either approach is equally suspect potentially. Sticking to any dogmatic system has flaws. The simple truth is that we were outplayed by three 6N teams. I have trouble understanding how we dump Andy Farrell (a decision I don't dispute) and then get out-coached by him with a weaker player pool.
-
- Posts: 19217
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
so...Hepburn, LCD, Sinckler, Attwood, Hill, Ewers, Earl, Simmonds, Randall, Simmonds, Woodburn, O'Connor, Slade, O'Flaherty, Malins?Oakboy wrote:Fair point. I think we could do worse than pick the best of Exeter/Bristol in every position unless there is no EQ availability or a substantial case for not so doing. Or, as Jones has done, we could sacrifice the 6N on the back of club players relegated for financial disciplinary reasons.Mellsblue wrote:Who are your replacements? I’m a sceptic, said previously that they’re off the pace, but most of them have earned some leeway and I’m not sure there are obvious upgrades.Oakboy wrote:
Potentially, but are they the best or were they?
Either approach is equally suspect potentially. Sticking to any dogmatic system has flaws. The simple truth is that we were outplayed by three 6N teams. I have trouble understanding how we dump Andy Farrell (a decision I don't dispute) and then get out-coached by him with a weaker player pool.
We were heavily outcoached though- the Irish were pretty much spot on; little things like turning Itoje over at a restart was a clearly planned, lots more targeted choke tackles, and Mako being done over by Furlong etc etc
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
Yep. Exeter, to their credit, get the very best out of their players and I’ve yet to see one of them bring that to test rugby.Banquo wrote:so...Hepburn, LCD, Sinckler, Attwood, Hill, Ewers, Earl, Simmonds, Randall, Simmonds, Woodburn, O'Connor, Slade, O'Flaherty, Malins?Oakboy wrote:Fair point. I think we could do worse than pick the best of Exeter/Bristol in every position unless there is no EQ availability or a substantial case for not so doing. Or, as Jones has done, we could sacrifice the 6N on the back of club players relegated for financial disciplinary reasons.Mellsblue wrote: Who are your replacements? I’m a sceptic, said previously that they’re off the pace, but most of them have earned some leeway and I’m not sure there are obvious upgrades.
Either approach is equally suspect potentially. Sticking to any dogmatic system has flaws. The simple truth is that we were outplayed by three 6N teams. I have trouble understanding how we dump Andy Farrell (a decision I don't dispute) and then get out-coached by him with a weaker player pool.
We were heavily outcoached though- the Irish were pretty much spot on; little things like turning Itoje over at a restart was a clearly planned, lots more targeted choke tackles, and Mako being done over by Furlong etc etc
-
- Posts: 5998
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
A little harsh on Slade, LCD and Nowell who have all had some good moments at test level.
In any case it’s a bizarre point. Exeter would be whistled to death in a test match (just look at how Hill is conditioned to dive in to rucks like a madman) and Bristol without Luatua, Vui, Piutau, Sheedy and Morahan etc. are clearly nothing like the same team.
Even more than that, those two teams have almost polar opposite styles ... I do not want to see an England side playing like Exeter and no-one can play like Bristol at test level.
In any case it’s a bizarre point. Exeter would be whistled to death in a test match (just look at how Hill is conditioned to dive in to rucks like a madman) and Bristol without Luatua, Vui, Piutau, Sheedy and Morahan etc. are clearly nothing like the same team.
Even more than that, those two teams have almost polar opposite styles ... I do not want to see an England side playing like Exeter and no-one can play like Bristol at test level.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
I’d agree on good moment but none of them, IMO, are nailed on test players.Scrumhead wrote:A little harsh on Slade, LCD and Nowell who have all had some good moments at test level.
In any case it’s a bizarre point. Exeter would be whistled to death in a test match (just look at how Hill is conditioned to dive in to rucks like a madman) and Bristol without Luatua, Vui, Piutau, Sheedy and Morahan etc. are clearly nothing like the same team.
Even more than that, those two teams have almost polar opposite styles ... I do not want to see an England side playing like Exeter and no-one can play like Bristol at test level.
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
Can we just accept our players and coaching set up just aren’t that good as a collective. We do not have god given right to be consistently good.
And the relentless defence of Ford being a world class playmaker are looking hollow. France have 2 youngsters far more assured with ball in hand
And the relentless defence of Ford being a world class playmaker are looking hollow. France have 2 youngsters far more assured with ball in hand
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6402
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
Indeed. Makes you wonder why though, doesn't it? 5 or 6 years back we were crap because our clubs were uncompetitive in Europe 'which was as close to international standard as possible etc,'. Now, Exeter are champions but it no longer counts.Mellsblue wrote:Yep. Exeter, to their credit, get the very best out of their players and I’ve yet to see one of them bring that to test rugby.Banquo wrote:so...Hepburn, LCD, Sinckler, Attwood, Hill, Ewers, Earl, Simmonds, Randall, Simmonds, Woodburn, O'Connor, Slade, O'Flaherty, Malins?Oakboy wrote:
Fair point. I think we could do worse than pick the best of Exeter/Bristol in every position unless there is no EQ availability or a substantial case for not so doing. Or, as Jones has done, we could sacrifice the 6N on the back of club players relegated for financial disciplinary reasons.
Either approach is equally suspect potentially. Sticking to any dogmatic system has flaws. The simple truth is that we were outplayed by three 6N teams. I have trouble understanding how we dump Andy Farrell (a decision I don't dispute) and then get out-coached by him with a weaker player pool.
We were heavily outcoached though- the Irish were pretty much spot on; little things like turning Itoje over at a restart was a clearly planned, lots more targeted choke tackles, and Mako being done over by Furlong etc etc
Or, maybe, the right man could get the best out of the players from the best team in Europe?
Let's face it, we should be doing better. Is that not a fair statement?
-
- Posts: 19217
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
The last bit is probably true, Though we do overestimate our players and underestimate others.Oakboy wrote:Indeed. Makes you wonder why though, doesn't it? 5 or 6 years back we were crap because our clubs were uncompetitive in Europe 'which was as close to international standard as possible etc,'. Now, Exeter are champions but it no longer counts.Mellsblue wrote:Yep. Exeter, to their credit, get the very best out of their players and I’ve yet to see one of them bring that to test rugby.Banquo wrote: so...Hepburn, LCD, Sinckler, Attwood, Hill, Ewers, Earl, Simmonds, Randall, Simmonds, Woodburn, O'Connor, Slade, O'Flaherty, Malins?
We were heavily outcoached though- the Irish were pretty much spot on; little things like turning Itoje over at a restart was a clearly planned, lots more targeted choke tackles, and Mako being done over by Furlong etc etc
Or, maybe, the right man could get the best out of the players from the best team in Europe?
Let's face it, we should be doing better. Is that not a fair statement?
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
Because performing in a dominant team in Eng/Europe is different to performing at test level.Oakboy wrote:Indeed. Makes you wonder why though, doesn't itMellsblue wrote:Yep. Exeter, to their credit, get the very best out of their players and I’ve yet to see one of them bring that to test rugby.Banquo wrote: so...Hepburn, LCD, Sinckler, Attwood, Hill, Ewers, Earl, Simmonds, Randall, Simmonds, Woodburn, O'Connor, Slade, O'Flaherty, Malins?
We were heavily outcoached though- the Irish were pretty much spot on; little things like turning Itoje over at a restart was a clearly planned, lots more targeted choke tackles, and Mako being done over by Furlong etc etc
-
- Posts: 2640
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm
Re: We need to talk about Eddie...
We're touring the USA in the summer. We just have to hope that some champ players are on on tour
Edit: i wasn't suggesting that these changes should have been in the 6n
Edit: i wasn't suggesting that these changes should have been in the 6n
Last edited by Danno on Sat Mar 20, 2021 10:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.