We need to talk about Eddie...

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by p/d »

fivepointer wrote:121 pts conceded. A 6N's record. Plus 67 penalties conceded.

Its been pretty bad. One standout performance against France cannot hide the fact that we've been off the pace.
I would also suggest France, perhaps, got it tactically wrong against us. Allowing us too much freedom. Nonetheless a bloody enjoyable game that one
fivepointer
Posts: 5916
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by fivepointer »

Banquo wrote:
fivepointer wrote:121 pts conceded. A 6N's record. Plus 67 penalties conceded.

Its been pretty bad. One standout performance against France cannot hide the fact that we've been off the pace.
I've held back, but its worse than that. There is a fundamental set of problems with the playing personnel imo. I think its about collective rugby intelligence as much as anything.
More or less the same group of players reached a WC final 18 months ago.

How can we go from general excellence in 2019 to wretched underachievers now. Why are our players making so many dull errors and poor decisions?
Banquo
Posts: 19217
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Banquo »

fivepointer wrote:
Banquo wrote:
fivepointer wrote:121 pts conceded. A 6N's record. Plus 67 penalties conceded.

Its been pretty bad. One standout performance against France cannot hide the fact that we've been off the pace.
I've held back, but its worse than that. There is a fundamental set of problems with the playing personnel imo. I think its about collective rugby intelligence as much as anything.
More or less the same group of players reached a WC final 18 months ago.

How can we go from general excellence in 2019 to wretched underachievers now. Why are our players making so many dull errors and poor decisions?
I give up, why? They have been monumentally stupid in 4 of the last 5 games.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Mellsblue »

Is this worse than the last 6N implosion? I’m going for yes as I think it’s macro rather than specific issues that can be remedied. My only mitigating factor is that the Sarries players, who form the spine of the team, are clearly miles off their game.
Banquo
Posts: 19217
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote:Is this worse than the last 6N implosion? I’m going for yes as I think it’s macro rather than specific issues that can be remedied. My only mitigating factor is that the Sarries players, who form the spine of the team, are clearly miles off their game.
Yes. Our discipline has been appalling all the way through- the forwards have generally been uber dim, and there is no leadership.
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Raggs »

2018 6n our fitness was smashed as Eddie said it would be. Not seen something similar this time.
Banquo
Posts: 19217
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Banquo »

Raggs wrote:2018 6n our fitness was smashed as Eddie said it would be. Not seen something similar this time.
we've looked unfit I think, but not by design.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:Is this worse than the last 6N implosion? I’m going for yes as I think it’s macro rather than specific issues that can be remedied. My only mitigating factor is that the Sarries players, who form the spine of the team, are clearly miles off their game.
Yes. Our discipline has been appalling all the way through- the forwards have generally been uber dim, and there is no leadership.
I worry about leadership from top to bottom. They look like a very confused team..... even the individuals who you’d class as intelligent players (of whom there isn’t enough).
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6402
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Oakboy »

Mellsblue wrote:Is this worse than the last 6N implosion? I’m going for yes as I think it’s macro rather than specific issues that can be remedied. My only mitigating factor is that the Sarries players, who form the spine of the team, are clearly miles off their game.
There was no compulsion to pick any of them.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Mellsblue »

Oakboy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:Is this worse than the last 6N implosion? I’m going for yes as I think it’s macro rather than specific issues that can be remedied. My only mitigating factor is that the Sarries players, who form the spine of the team, are clearly miles off their game.
There was no compulsion to pick any of them.
Other than them being some of the best EQP players.
Danno
Posts: 2640
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Danno »

Yes, only other than Itoje, they've proved that they aren't up to speed any more. All of these could come in from the bench

Mako - Obano
George - Dunn
Billy - Dombrandt, Mercer, hell look at Barbeary
Farrell - anyone
Daly - Malins
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6402
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Oakboy »

Mellsblue wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:Is this worse than the last 6N implosion? I’m going for yes as I think it’s macro rather than specific issues that can be remedied. My only mitigating factor is that the Sarries players, who form the spine of the team, are clearly miles off their game.
There was no compulsion to pick any of them.
Other than them being some of the best EQP players.
Potentially, but are they the best or were they?
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6402
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Oakboy »

Danno wrote:Yes, only other than Itoje, they've proved that they aren't up to speed any more. All of these could come in from the bench

Mako - Obano
George - Dunn
Billy - Dombrandt, Mercer, hell look at Barbeary
Farrell - anyone
Daly - Malins
I suggest a re-think on the No 8 position is fundamental to improving the team unit.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Mellsblue »

Danno wrote:Yes, only other than Itoje, they've proved that they aren't up to speed any more. All of these could come in from the bench

Mako - Obano
George - Dunn
Billy - Dombrandt, Mercer, hell look at Barbeary
Farrell - anyone
Daly - Malins
I doubt some of those are upgrades* plus the Sarries players have mostly earned some leeway with past performances.

*Mako > Obano
George > Dunn
Billy > unproven talent... happy to look at upgrades but wouldn’t say they’re def, or even probably, better at present.
Farrell > anyone (England’s IC options, quality and quantity, is poor)
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Mellsblue »

Oakboy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
There was no compulsion to pick any of them.
Other than them being some of the best EQP players.
Potentially, but are they the best or were they?
Who are your replacements? I’m a sceptic, said previously that they’re off the pace, but most of them have earned some leeway and I’m not sure there are obvious upgrades.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6402
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Oakboy »

Mellsblue wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote: Other than them being some of the best EQP players.
Potentially, but are they the best or were they?
Who are your replacements? I’m a sceptic, said previously that they’re off the pace, but most of them have earned some leeway and I’m not sure there are obvious upgrades.
Fair point. I think we could do worse than pick the best of Exeter/Bristol in every position unless there is no EQ availability or a substantial case for not so doing. Or, as Jones has done, we could sacrifice the 6N on the back of club players relegated for financial disciplinary reasons.

Either approach is equally suspect potentially. Sticking to any dogmatic system has flaws. The simple truth is that we were outplayed by three 6N teams. I have trouble understanding how we dump Andy Farrell (a decision I don't dispute) and then get out-coached by him with a weaker player pool.
Banquo
Posts: 19217
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
Potentially, but are they the best or were they?
Who are your replacements? I’m a sceptic, said previously that they’re off the pace, but most of them have earned some leeway and I’m not sure there are obvious upgrades.
Fair point. I think we could do worse than pick the best of Exeter/Bristol in every position unless there is no EQ availability or a substantial case for not so doing. Or, as Jones has done, we could sacrifice the 6N on the back of club players relegated for financial disciplinary reasons.

Either approach is equally suspect potentially. Sticking to any dogmatic system has flaws. The simple truth is that we were outplayed by three 6N teams. I have trouble understanding how we dump Andy Farrell (a decision I don't dispute) and then get out-coached by him with a weaker player pool.
so...Hepburn, LCD, Sinckler, Attwood, Hill, Ewers, Earl, Simmonds, Randall, Simmonds, Woodburn, O'Connor, Slade, O'Flaherty, Malins?

We were heavily outcoached though- the Irish were pretty much spot on; little things like turning Itoje over at a restart was a clearly planned, lots more targeted choke tackles, and Mako being done over by Furlong etc etc
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote: Who are your replacements? I’m a sceptic, said previously that they’re off the pace, but most of them have earned some leeway and I’m not sure there are obvious upgrades.
Fair point. I think we could do worse than pick the best of Exeter/Bristol in every position unless there is no EQ availability or a substantial case for not so doing. Or, as Jones has done, we could sacrifice the 6N on the back of club players relegated for financial disciplinary reasons.

Either approach is equally suspect potentially. Sticking to any dogmatic system has flaws. The simple truth is that we were outplayed by three 6N teams. I have trouble understanding how we dump Andy Farrell (a decision I don't dispute) and then get out-coached by him with a weaker player pool.
so...Hepburn, LCD, Sinckler, Attwood, Hill, Ewers, Earl, Simmonds, Randall, Simmonds, Woodburn, O'Connor, Slade, O'Flaherty, Malins?

We were heavily outcoached though- the Irish were pretty much spot on; little things like turning Itoje over at a restart was a clearly planned, lots more targeted choke tackles, and Mako being done over by Furlong etc etc
Yep. Exeter, to their credit, get the very best out of their players and I’ve yet to see one of them bring that to test rugby.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5998
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Scrumhead »

A little harsh on Slade, LCD and Nowell who have all had some good moments at test level.

In any case it’s a bizarre point. Exeter would be whistled to death in a test match (just look at how Hill is conditioned to dive in to rucks like a madman) and Bristol without Luatua, Vui, Piutau, Sheedy and Morahan etc. are clearly nothing like the same team.

Even more than that, those two teams have almost polar opposite styles ... I do not want to see an England side playing like Exeter and no-one can play like Bristol at test level.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Mellsblue »

Scrumhead wrote:A little harsh on Slade, LCD and Nowell who have all had some good moments at test level.

In any case it’s a bizarre point. Exeter would be whistled to death in a test match (just look at how Hill is conditioned to dive in to rucks like a madman) and Bristol without Luatua, Vui, Piutau, Sheedy and Morahan etc. are clearly nothing like the same team.

Even more than that, those two teams have almost polar opposite styles ... I do not want to see an England side playing like Exeter and no-one can play like Bristol at test level.
I’d agree on good moment but none of them, IMO, are nailed on test players.
p/d
Posts: 3828
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by p/d »

Can we just accept our players and coaching set up just aren’t that good as a collective. We do not have god given right to be consistently good.

And the relentless defence of Ford being a world class playmaker are looking hollow. France have 2 youngsters far more assured with ball in hand
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6402
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Oakboy »

Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:
Fair point. I think we could do worse than pick the best of Exeter/Bristol in every position unless there is no EQ availability or a substantial case for not so doing. Or, as Jones has done, we could sacrifice the 6N on the back of club players relegated for financial disciplinary reasons.

Either approach is equally suspect potentially. Sticking to any dogmatic system has flaws. The simple truth is that we were outplayed by three 6N teams. I have trouble understanding how we dump Andy Farrell (a decision I don't dispute) and then get out-coached by him with a weaker player pool.
so...Hepburn, LCD, Sinckler, Attwood, Hill, Ewers, Earl, Simmonds, Randall, Simmonds, Woodburn, O'Connor, Slade, O'Flaherty, Malins?

We were heavily outcoached though- the Irish were pretty much spot on; little things like turning Itoje over at a restart was a clearly planned, lots more targeted choke tackles, and Mako being done over by Furlong etc etc
Yep. Exeter, to their credit, get the very best out of their players and I’ve yet to see one of them bring that to test rugby.
Indeed. Makes you wonder why though, doesn't it? 5 or 6 years back we were crap because our clubs were uncompetitive in Europe 'which was as close to international standard as possible etc,'. Now, Exeter are champions but it no longer counts.

Or, maybe, the right man could get the best out of the players from the best team in Europe?

Let's face it, we should be doing better. Is that not a fair statement?
Banquo
Posts: 19217
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote: so...Hepburn, LCD, Sinckler, Attwood, Hill, Ewers, Earl, Simmonds, Randall, Simmonds, Woodburn, O'Connor, Slade, O'Flaherty, Malins?

We were heavily outcoached though- the Irish were pretty much spot on; little things like turning Itoje over at a restart was a clearly planned, lots more targeted choke tackles, and Mako being done over by Furlong etc etc
Yep. Exeter, to their credit, get the very best out of their players and I’ve yet to see one of them bring that to test rugby.
Indeed. Makes you wonder why though, doesn't it? 5 or 6 years back we were crap because our clubs were uncompetitive in Europe 'which was as close to international standard as possible etc,'. Now, Exeter are champions but it no longer counts.

Or, maybe, the right man could get the best out of the players from the best team in Europe?

Let's face it, we should be doing better. Is that not a fair statement?
The last bit is probably true, Though we do overestimate our players and underestimate others.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14573
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Mellsblue »

Oakboy wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote: so...Hepburn, LCD, Sinckler, Attwood, Hill, Ewers, Earl, Simmonds, Randall, Simmonds, Woodburn, O'Connor, Slade, O'Flaherty, Malins?

We were heavily outcoached though- the Irish were pretty much spot on; little things like turning Itoje over at a restart was a clearly planned, lots more targeted choke tackles, and Mako being done over by Furlong etc etc
Yep. Exeter, to their credit, get the very best out of their players and I’ve yet to see one of them bring that to test rugby.
Indeed. Makes you wonder why though, doesn't it
Because performing in a dominant team in Eng/Europe is different to performing at test level.
Danno
Posts: 2640
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: We need to talk about Eddie...

Post by Danno »

We're touring the USA in the summer. We just have to hope that some champ players are on on tour

Edit: i wasn't suggesting that these changes should have been in the 6n
Last edited by Danno on Sat Mar 20, 2021 10:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply