If we’re worried moving Barbeary forward will diminish his impact in the loose I can only imagine what will happen to Vunipola.Spiffy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 1:23 amIs it too late to convert Billy V into a prop. He has the right credentials - 130kg, a low centre of gravity, a large arse and power. Do it now, give him a couple of years to get used, he'd still be only 34 by the next RWC. Younger than Dan Cole is at present. You know it makes sense.
Borthwick’s England 2.0
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 12364
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
-
- Posts: 20892
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Spiffy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 1:23 amIs it too late to convert Billy V into a prop. He has the right credentials - 130kg, a low centre of gravity, a large arse and power. Do it now, give him a couple of years to get used, he'd still be only 34 by the next RWC. Younger than Dan Cole is at present. You know it makes sense.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9376
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Given that his contribution in the loose was 10 points to South Africa - I'd happily reduce that.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 7:11 am If we’re worried moving Barbeary forward will diminish his impact in the loose I can only imagine what will happen to Vunipola.
Ideally to 0 because he'd be left at home, but...
-
- Posts: 20892
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Kind of sad to see that as what will be the end for Billy. He'd clearly lost confidence in the last game he started- he's only 30, so a real shame tbh.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 9:52 amGiven that his contribution in the loose was 10 points to South Africa - I'd happily reduce that.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 7:11 am If we’re worried moving Barbeary forward will diminish his impact in the loose I can only imagine what will happen to Vunipola.
Ideally to 0 because he'd be left at home, but...
-
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:18 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
I imagine he scrummages, then doesn't move, and is then taken by motorised cart to the next scrum.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 7:11 amIf we’re worried moving Barbeary forward will diminish his impact in the loose I can only imagine what will happen to Vunipola.Spiffy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 1:23 amIs it too late to convert Billy V into a prop. He has the right credentials - 130kg, a low centre of gravity, a large arse and power. Do it now, give him a couple of years to get used, he'd still be only 34 by the next RWC. Younger than Dan Cole is at present. You know it makes sense.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 16097
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
The Dan Cole role.Tom Moore wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 11:08 amI imagine he scrummages, then doesn't move, and is then taken by motorised cart to the next scrum.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 7:11 amIf we’re worried moving Barbeary forward will diminish his impact in the loose I can only imagine what will happen to Vunipola.Spiffy wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 1:23 am
Is it too late to convert Billy V into a prop. He has the right credentials - 130kg, a low centre of gravity, a large arse and power. Do it now, give him a couple of years to get used, he'd still be only 34 by the next RWC. Younger than Dan Cole is at present. You know it makes sense.
- Spiffy
- Posts: 2210
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Agree. At his peak Billy was a pretty effective No.8 - a powerful hard-yards carrier, a gain liner with good hands and often decent at covering the back field too. Most teams have moved on from his kind of No.8 role and are playing faster, more athletic 8s who are expected to cover a lot of ground, multitask and pop up anywhere (that does not preclude the fact that they can be effective carriers too.) Billy is too ponderous to fit this mode. It does not help that he does seem pretty overweight. If he really wants to reinvent himself (and I'm not sure that he can) he has to shed significant Kgs before anything else.Banquo wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 9:57 amKind of sad to see that as what will be the end for Billy. He'd clearly lost confidence in the last game he started- he's only 30, so a real shame tbh.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 9:52 amGiven that his contribution in the loose was 10 points to South Africa - I'd happily reduce that.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 7:11 am If we’re worried moving Barbeary forward will diminish his impact in the loose I can only imagine what will happen to Vunipola.
Ideally to 0 because he'd be left at home, but...
-
- Posts: 4010
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
I thought he came on the pitch like a sulky kid who got the shitty Christmas anorak with mittens sewn into the sleeves…..Banquo wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 9:57 amKind of sad to see that as what will be the end for Billy. He'd clearly lost confidence in the last game he started- he's only 30, so a real shame tbh.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 9:52 amGiven that his contribution in the loose was 10 points to South Africa - I'd happily reduce that.Mikey Brown wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 7:11 am If we’re worried moving Barbeary forward will diminish his impact in the loose I can only imagine what will happen to Vunipola.
Ideally to 0 because he'd be left at home, but...
…….. still haunts me that
- Puja
- Posts: 18188
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Looked like he'd got his hands stuck in the sleeves the first time he was passed the ball.p/d wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 9:04 pmI thought he came on the pitch like a sulky kid who got the shitty Christmas anorak with mittens sewn into the sleeves…..Banquo wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 9:57 amKind of sad to see that as what will be the end for Billy. He'd clearly lost confidence in the last game he started- he's only 30, so a real shame tbh.Which Tyler wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2023 9:52 am
Given that his contribution in the loose was 10 points to South Africa - I'd happily reduce that.
Ideally to 0 because he'd be left at home, but...
…….. still haunts me that
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 5973
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
it was an in joke … go back a couple of pages and you’ll find the references. Hint 4 letter user name and not FKAS …LongForgotten wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2023 10:54 pmI tend to agree but props who don't contribute in the loose bring their own problems. It's fairly rare for a referee to consistently reward a dominant scrum so I understand why coaches have prioritised other elements which will be beneficial every game.
On the whole, I don’t see the point in conceptual debates that don’t actually relate to any real players. It would be excellent if we had some ‘monsters’ to call upon, but the fact is that we don’t (Fasogbon might be our best bet given how big he is at such a young age).
To your point, we have some decent all rounders and I think we need to find a way to get the best of existing resources rather than wishing for players who don’t exist.
-
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:18 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Do we actually have a scrummaging coach as part of Borthwick's team? I'd imagine that would help.
-
- Posts: 12364
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Don’t we have some recently retired 30 year old from Tigers?
-
- Posts: 3743
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Billy carried england on his back for a number of years. The amount of punishment his body must have got during the early EJ period must be equivalent to an entire career playing in other positions. He should get respect for that.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 16097
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
-
- Posts: 286
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:18 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Thank you. Could someone who understands scrummaging tell me whether Genge and Sinckler just got turned over because the Saffers have an immense scrum, whether they're objectively poor scrummages at international level, or somewhere in between please?
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9376
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
He's our first choice starter, not coachMikey Brown wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 7:13 am Don’t we have some recently retired 40 year old from Tigers?
- Puja
- Posts: 18188
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
The issue was mostly the South African 2nds pack being outstanding, both in talent and in drills.Tom Moore wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 8:15 amThank you. Could someone who understands scrummaging tell me whether Genge and Sinckler just got turned over because the Saffers have an immense scrum, whether they're objectively poor scrummages at international level, or somewhere in between please?
Genge is a pretty good international scrummager, but the issue is that he's an attacking prop - Marler survived by defending hard and just preventing SA from getting a tangible advantage (same as Rodd in that AIs game a while back), whereas Genge attacked. It means that a penalty can go either way because it'll be a more spectacular result than the stasis that Marler achieved, and it could be argued that Genge was hard done by in some of the decisions, because the ref had it in his mind that South Africa were winning every scrum. When he tried to defend for that last scrum, that's when he got too long and ended up putting his knee on the floor. So, not a bad scrummager, but his strengths not suited to the situation.
Sinckler is generally not objectively poor, but SA attacked him hard with one of the best props in the game and he just had no answer in the first couple of scrums. Defended better after that, but just generally outclassed by world class.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 2133
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
I found this interestingTom Moore wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 8:15 amThank you. Could someone who understands scrummaging tell me whether Genge and Sinckler just got turned over because the Saffers have an immense scrum, whether they're objectively poor scrummages at international level, or somewhere in between please?
- Puja
- Posts: 18188
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
That is fascinating stuff. Corbisiero should be doing more punditry than just on American television, based on that.Danno wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 12:14 pmI found this interesting
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 4010
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Isn't it just!
That last scrum analysis was excellent.
That last scrum analysis was excellent.
-
- Posts: 12364
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Yeah, if they aren't going to do anything about 40% of every game being taken up with scrums we should at least get a few more people (than just Flatman) that have some idea of what's going on.
I played lock and would happily play 0-0 games in the mud and rain, but I am absolutely bored to fucking tears with scrums the way they are at the moment. Watching hours and hours of these guys carefully adjusting eachother's waistbands before falling to the floor and pointing at eachother in surprise, with very little insight from commentary, is just not a good use of time. Most of the analysis seems to boil down to "they were both cheating but here's a match-winning penalty on the back of a mysterious 50/50 call".
-
- Posts: 3743
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
I don't think your average viewer cares a huge amount about the finer technical details. They could try and show more of the pure physicality of a scrum though. Some sort of close up shots. Imagine a hooker or scrum half half cam (I know that's not really practical). That to me is what a normal member of the public would find intriguing.
A shot from miles away which just shows a mass of bodies seems really dull.
A shot from miles away which just shows a mass of bodies seems really dull.
-
- Posts: 1553
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Good analysis that Puja. It’s also why I wanted VRR in the squad as he’s a strong scrummager without having to be overly aggressive as his starting point. He’d not have played anyway though so it’s moot. But we just don’t have anyone on the other side to match Malherbe, Koch or Nayakane in scrummaging terms. Stuart was the big hope for me but his scrummaging has been really poor of late.Puja wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 10:56 amThe issue was mostly the South African 2nds pack being outstanding, both in talent and in drills.
Genge is a pretty good international scrummager, but the issue is that he's an attacking prop - Marler survived by defending hard and just preventing SA from getting a tangible advantage (same as Rodd in that AIs game a while back), whereas Genge attacked. It means that a penalty can go either way because it'll be a more spectacular result than the stasis that Marler achieved, and it could be argued that Genge was hard done by in some of the decisions, because the ref had it in his mind that South Africa were winning every scrum. When he tried to defend for that last scrum, that's when he got too long and ended up putting his knee on the floor. So, not a bad scrummager, but his strengths not suited to the situation.
Sinckler is generally not objectively poor, but SA attacked him hard with one of the best props in the game and he just had no answer in the first couple of scrums. Defended better after that, but just generally outclassed by world class.
Puja
-
- Posts: 1553
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
Good find that. I always enjoyed Corbisiero’s analysis when he was commentating. Strangely I never thought Paul Wallace’s analysis was in the same league as him and Flats.Danno wrote: ↑Thu Oct 26, 2023 12:14 pmI found this interesting
My initial instant thought at that last scrum was that it was a reset all day long. Koch got himself into all sorts of bother, which Genge couldn’t do anything about other than try to keep hold of him, but then it had all started to move rapidly towards Sinckler. Once it starts moving like that it can’t be stopped.
Kitshoff got no change out of Cole on those first two. But then Cole got Nche’d. When you’re knackered you don’t want to be looking at a fresh Nche. Bloody good analysis from Corbs, bang on.
-
- Posts: 12364
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Borthwick’s England 2.0
On that note it’s interesting that Koch has been dropped for Nyakane for the final, where many viewers could reasonably have figured he was part of the dominant scrum that turned the entire game around.