padprop wrote:I’d say that for most players, but to have 43 turnovers when the next best player is 19... I’d love to see if that translates to the international game straight away, instead of being pissed around by Eddie, getting an injury in a training camp and being forgotten about
43 + another 3 or 4 from today’s game. Just outrageous.
It’s also worth noting that’s in combination with much more too. He’s not just a turnover machine and is a good carrier and a good defender too.
fivepointer wrote:England have 6 games in 7 weeks. Willis, or anyone else, doesnt have to play in every game. This is a perfect opportunity to spread the load and look at a number of new players.
You could easily rotate on a game by game basis.
We dont have to make any long term decisions now.
Just get him in, give him a chance and lets see where we are at the end of the autumn.
In ‘spreading the load’ you also have to give players the right opportunity ie having a decent core of experience and capability around them. I hope that’s the case.
His carrying since the restart has been next level. Not something he really did in his breakthrough season, but now it is another strength, rather than something people asked questions of
Peej wrote:His carrying since the restart has been next level. Not something he really did in his breakthrough season, but now it is another strength, rather than something people asked questions of
He's always been a decent carrier... it's improved, I think he's added a bit of offloading, but he's always had that determination to make ground.
Its always just been unfortunate injuries with Willis. It could have very easily been him instead of Underhill or Curry in the WC final if he had a bit more luck. He may have improved a couple percentages recently but he’s always had a full package, at least as long as ive been watching him.
I think the level of the Oh Dear depends on which players and how contained it is. If they found out yesterday, then they may not have had any significant group training sessions since the weekend and it could be that those 4 are all that there'll be.
Puja wrote:I think the level of the Oh Dear depends on which players and how contained it is. If they found out yesterday, then they may not have had any significant group training sessions since the weekend and it could be that those 4 are all that there'll be.
Puja
They've cancelled training for the week so that should help mitigate exposure in the group. Hopefully for them it's an isolated outbreak and doesn't hit their chances too much. We want a competitive final after all.
Racing have had some Covid issues as well. Could Chiefs end up winning both finals via Covid? Would sum up this shit show of a year. Would it be worse to win or lose a final because of Covid?
Desperately hoping the next round of tests comes back clean. Rumours are that it's academy players in a single house, so hopefully academy staff too, and the seniors are all clear.
More tests tomorrow and decision to play made depending on the results. Not ideal for Exeter for preparaion or Bris if they have to step up.
Or indeed Wasps if they are given the all clear bearing in mind they haven't trained in a week...
How could you conscionably give them the all clear when they have had multiple positive cases within the last week? Madness.
Depends who the positive cases are. Rumour has it that the first four were academy players sharing a house and the entire squad has been in isolation since then. If that's the case and the four new cases this week are the only people it's spread to, I don't see why the rest of squad couldn't play if they continue to test negative.
It's about the same quality of information that out world beating track and trace system uses.
On a serious note, I would like to hope that the appropriate information about Wasps' tests is available to the decision-makers and is just not being given out to the public domain.