My only question mark would be sharpness and fitness at this level, given a longish lay off and not much playing time. But as I said, he is very smart.Timbo wrote:Wilson is a machine. He’ll go well.jngf wrote:So Eddie plays Wilson at openside insteadTimbo wrote:According to Underhill Curry was the fastest of all the England forwards at the World Cup. Saw an interview where he joked that Tom should be doing speed work with the backs instead.
Team news for Wales
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 19156
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
-
- Posts: 19156
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
Depends on what role you have them doing, but generally you'd expect them to have more endurance if you look at what they do. Joe Simmonds? I've never seen him in an extended sprint tbh, but others may have.Oakboy wrote:Over what distance should a backrower be judged, though? Normally, I'd guess 20 metres would be adequate. If the distance is longer I doubt any would catch Simmonds.
As an aside Jason Robinson struggled to maintain any sort of pace after about 30 m iirc.
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Team news for Wales
Yep. Mercer is a pretty decent athlete, and at 6’3” with his stride length I would imagine he’d catch quite a few inside backs over 60-70 metres in a straight line.Banquo wrote:I don't think that's too surprising tbh; most 10's would lose their wheels after 40m. Imagine Farrell in that scenario, or even Ford? Great effort from Mercer in fairness.Which Tyler wrote:I know.. but...Stom wrote:Mercer is quick, yes. Luckily Smith is a lot quicker than he was 2 years ago, though. He was still a kid back then, was blowing after 10m, lol.
He still got caught by a #8 who'd been playing the whole match.
He's going to have to do something pretty attrocious to be able to forget that one (something like Carling getting dumped instead of scoring a try).
Also - is Smith actually faster now? or just capable of running more than 20 yards whilst fresh? because at no stage was he pulling away from Zach
-
- Posts: 2259
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 9:05 am
Re: Team news for Wales
I’s say Ben Earl would give Simmonds a pretty decent race tbh, over more or less any sprint distance. Reckon Ardie Savea might be faster than both of them though.Oakboy wrote:Over what distance should a backrower be judged, though? Normally, I'd guess 20 metres would be adequate. If the distance is longer I doubt any would catch Simmonds.
Edit: are you talking Joe Simmonds? If so, do you not think his brother quicker over 20m+?
-
- Posts: 19156
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
I didn't know if he meant a back rower catch a 10 like Joe Simmonds, or was referring to Simmonds senior...I'd say Sam Simmonds has very good acceleration but no idea of his stamina at that pace. Ideally you want (say) an openside to have very good acceleration, but also excellent stamina for longer sometimes speculative supporting runs.Timbo wrote:I’s say Ben Earl would give Simmonds a pretty decent race tbh, over more or less any sprint distance. Reckon Ardie Savea might be faster than both of them though.Oakboy wrote:Over what distance should a backrower be judged, though? Normally, I'd guess 20 metres would be adequate. If the distance is longer I doubt any would catch Simmonds.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Team news for Wales
I was only referring to backrowers.Timbo wrote:I’s say Ben Earl would give Simmonds a pretty decent race tbh, over more or less any sprint distance. Reckon Ardie Savea might be faster than both of them though.Oakboy wrote:Over what distance should a backrower be judged, though? Normally, I'd guess 20 metres would be adequate. If the distance is longer I doubt any would catch Simmonds.
Edit: are you talking Joe Simmonds? If so, do you not think his brother quicker over 20m+?
-
- Posts: 19156
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
In that case I don't know, I don't recall seeing Simmonds S over more than 20m, where he is rapid.Oakboy wrote:I was only referring to backrowers.Timbo wrote:I’s say Ben Earl would give Simmonds a pretty decent race tbh, over more or less any sprint distance. Reckon Ardie Savea might be faster than both of them though.Oakboy wrote:Over what distance should a backrower be judged, though? Normally, I'd guess 20 metres would be adequate. If the distance is longer I doubt any would catch Simmonds.
Edit: are you talking Joe Simmonds? If so, do you not think his brother quicker over 20m+?
-
- Posts: 5897
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
Ben Earl is rapid. Watch his try against Saints at the w/e. He ran a fair distance and some nippy backs didnt get close to him.
-
- Posts: 5985
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am
Re: Team news for Wales
So annoying that Underhill is out. Not only could it have prevented yet another back row bodge job, I’d also liked to have seen him have a real go at Biggar (who must have been touch and go).
I know Watson hasn’t played much rugby but Navidi and Williams are pretty big dice rolls from Pivac off the back of 0 rugby in some time. Am I right in thinking Williams hasn’t played at all since the RWC semi?
I know Watson hasn’t played much rugby but Navidi and Williams are pretty big dice rolls from Pivac off the back of 0 rugby in some time. Am I right in thinking Williams hasn’t played at all since the RWC semi?
- Puja
- Posts: 17713
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
Williams played the weekend for Scarlets. Still a bit of a dice roll though.Scrumhead wrote:So annoying that Underhill is out. Not only could it have prevented yet another back row bodge job, I’d also liked to have seen him have a real go at Biggar (who must have been touch and go).
I know Watson hasn’t played much rugby but Navidi and Williams are pretty big dice rolls from Pivac off the back of 0 rugby in some time. Am I right in thinking Williams hasn’t played at all since the RWC semi?
And, if Underhill had been fit, then one of him or Wilson would've been on the bench instead of Earl. No way Eddie is giving up his Tesco Value PSdT at 6.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:30 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
Remember when Itoje was played at 6 for a few games? Good times.
-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 11:27 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
Williams was retained by Wales, he hasnt played for Scarlets yet.Puja wrote:Williams played the weekend for Scarlets. Still a bit of a dice roll though.Scrumhead wrote:So annoying that Underhill is out. Not only could it have prevented yet another back row bodge job, I’d also liked to have seen him have a real go at Biggar (who must have been touch and go).
I know Watson hasn’t played much rugby but Navidi and Williams are pretty big dice rolls from Pivac off the back of 0 rugby in some time. Am I right in thinking Williams hasn’t played at all since the RWC semi?
And, if Underhill had been fit, then one of him or Wilson would've been on the bench instead of Earl. No way Eddie is giving up his Tesco Value PSdT at 6.
Puja
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
The back row is a mind f#ck, and Ewels on the bench is pointless
-
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: Team news for Wales
You're all ignoring the May shaped elephant in the room when it comes to back row speed. All other comparisons are meaningless.
-
- Posts: 19156
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
jack Nowell, not so much.Beasties wrote:You're all ignoring the May shaped elephant in the room when it comes to back row speed. All other comparisons are meaningless.
-
- Posts: 2598
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
Genuinely laughed out loud at thatPuja wrote: And, if Underhill had been fit, then one of him or Wilson would've been on the bench instead of Earl. No way Eddie is giving up his Tesco Value PSdT at 6.
Puja
-
- Posts: 12161
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
Anyone else sort of lost interest a bit in this 6 nations? Particularly with the Italy situation. Maybe it’s always this way after the World Cup.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: Team news for Wales
What's vexing me is we've gone this far under Jones with little no work done on the attack front and we're starting to count down to a new coach who will probably want to work on set piece and defence, unless we get Townsend and just flip in absurd fashion the other way. I'd like the team to actually look like they can attack, not just off set piece, and not just with kicking the ball away. We don't have to look like the 2001 Brumbies or 2011 Reds overnight, but something worth watching and competent would be nice
-
- Posts: 12161
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
A coach swap with England and Scotland would definitely get me interested again. That would be amazing to watch.
Townsend absolutely at a loss what to do with all these big carriers and EJ trying to destroy Scottish rugby from the inside for being insulted by those two idiots on the way back from Murrayfield.
Townsend absolutely at a loss what to do with all these big carriers and EJ trying to destroy Scottish rugby from the inside for being insulted by those two idiots on the way back from Murrayfield.
-
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: Team news for Wales
Defo subdued after a WC. But also the two breaks in the middle make it a struggle to sustain interest.Mikey Brown wrote:Anyone else sort of lost interest a bit in this 6 nations? Particularly with the Italy situation. Maybe it’s always this way after the World Cup.
-
- Posts: 5897
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
A little. Knowing that its not going to finish is a bit of a downer. That and England's rather stodgy, conservative selection and play havent exactly set the pulses racing. Just how much further forward are we going to be after the Wales game?Mikey Brown wrote:Anyone else sort of lost interest a bit in this 6 nations? Particularly with the Italy situation. Maybe it’s always this way after the World Cup.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Team news for Wales
I certainly agree that the 6N needs to scrap the gap weeks which lose all credibility with players turning out for their clubs. What depresses me most is that our RWC SF performance showed how we could play. Then, because SA steamrollered us, Jones now sees copying those tactics as the new fashion. I think that England are a horrendous team to watch for the neutral based on all our matches in this 6N. The current style of kicking and trying to dominate without the ball has no chance of attracting non-rugby people to watch the game - effectively destroying any PR blip from reaching the SF.Beasties wrote:Defo subdued after a WC. But also the two breaks in the middle make it a struggle to sustain interest.Mikey Brown wrote:Anyone else sort of lost interest a bit in this 6 nations? Particularly with the Italy situation. Maybe it’s always this way after the World Cup.
Talking to friends from the other home nations, I get, "I don't bother to watch England unless we are playing them. They are so boring." I don't have a counter-argument and my only defence is that I am an avid fan so I'll carry on watching. As ever, it is what we have with Jones - the 'Mourinho effect'. Effectively it's win or zero.
- Puja
- Posts: 17713
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
The selection is not helping me in the slightest. I want England to win (and gods, I cannot take a loss to Wales considering how many Welsh I work with), but it feels like the only way Lawes at 6, Curry at 8, and Daly at 15 might stop happening is if we lose. And, if we continue winning with them, then it'll be cemented in as our side and we'll continue playing with one hand tied behind our back until we play NZ or SA and get destroyed.fivepointer wrote:A little. Knowing that its not going to finish is a bit of a downer. That and England's rather stodgy, conservative selection and play havent exactly set the pulses racing. Just how much further forward are we going to be after the Wales game?Mikey Brown wrote:Anyone else sort of lost interest a bit in this 6 nations? Particularly with the Italy situation. Maybe it’s always this way after the World Cup.
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 12161
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: Team news for Wales
I actually quite appreciated the weeks off when they arrived, which is something I've never, ever felt before watching the 6 nations.Beasties wrote:Defo subdued after a WC. But also the two breaks in the middle make it a struggle to sustain interest.Mikey Brown wrote:Anyone else sort of lost interest a bit in this 6 nations? Particularly with the Italy situation. Maybe it’s always this way after the World Cup.
- Mr Mwenda
- Posts: 2460
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 7:42 am
Re: Team news for Wales
I think many of them would say "boring, boring England" whatever was put in front of them. Lord knows Ireland, Wales and Scotland have stunk out the place enough this and previous seasons despite in some cases having their best ever teams.Oakboy wrote:
Talking to friends from the other home nations, I get, "I don't bother to watch England unless we are playing them. They are so boring." I don't have a counter-argument and my only defence is that I am an avid fan so I'll carry on watching. As ever, it is what we have with Jones - the 'Mourinho effect'. Effectively it's win or zero.
England v Wales for a triple crown? That still interests me.