SF v SA

Moderator: Puja

Post Reply
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1569
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by jngf »

Odds of an England win 5 / 1 currently
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1569
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by jngf »

A concern I really have is Manu is our only tight hard yards carrier and with the possible exception of Martin can’t see who else in our pack can potentially do this ….Lawes used to be able to, but that was when he still played lock and had a little more ballast - now he’s the build of an erstatz basketball player and a bit too spindly for the close quarters driving stuff….

Ludlam, though not a laviathon, would at least have brought some much needed, direct driving power to our forward play and not including him is plain strange
p/d
Posts: 4013
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by p/d »

On a positive note, the cricket is going well
User avatar
canta_brian
Posts: 1285
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by canta_brian »

p/d wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 2:41 pm On a positive note, the cricket is going well
I wouldn’t worry, if it’s like last time when England didn’t win you’ll come up with some daft rule that says they did.
User avatar
canta_brian
Posts: 1285
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:52 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by canta_brian »

Great venue name btw
p/d
Posts: 4013
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by p/d »

canta_brian wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 2:57 pm
p/d wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 2:41 pm On a positive note, the cricket is going well
I wouldn’t worry, if it’s like last time when England didn’t win you’ll come up with some daft rule that says they did.
I’m guessing ‘we are shit’ might face some resistance
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 2210
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Spiffy »

Banquo wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 9:16 am
Spiffy wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:19 am
Banquo wrote: Fri Oct 20, 2023 10:07 pm

NZ were near perfect, amazing performance.
Yes - great application,organization, discipline etc. but to be honest Argentina were well short of ideas, didn't fire a shot and never looked like breaching the fantastic AB defence. A bit of a training romp for NZ and for me something of a boring one sided contest just watching NZ rack up the points. Damp squibb of a semi.
I don't agree, NZ just didn't let Argentina play, and the first half hour was a masterclass. A couple of the kiwi counters were fantastic to watch with backs and forwards interacting brilliantly. You can only play what's in front of you #cliche
Point taken and I know the old adage that you can only play as well as the opposition allows. But that's often too black and white. Yes - NZ were great, but I think it was also clear that Argentina was a poor team with little organization, bereft of attacking ideas, and lacking in spirit. They showed as much against England in their pool game so I suppose this was no great surprise. A disappointing contest (or no contest) for a RWC semi final.
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 2210
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Spiffy »

jngf wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 1:51 pm A concern I really have is Manu is our only tight hard yards carrier and with the possible exception of Martin can’t see who else in our pack can potentially do this ….Lawes used to be able to, but that was when he still played lock and had a little more ballast - now he’s the build of an erstatz basketball player and a bit too spindly for the close quarters driving stuff….

Ludlam, though not a laviathon, would at least have brought some much needed, direct driving power to our forward play and not including him is plain strange
Manu won't get much out of deAllende anyway - a tough nut in both defence and attack.
User avatar
jngf
Posts: 1569
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2016 5:57 pm

Re: SF v SA photo

Post by jngf »

Anthropomorthic?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16128
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: SF v SA

Post by Mellsblue »

jngf wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 1:51 pm Lawes used to be able to, but that was when he still played lock and had a little more ballast - now he’s the build of an erstatz basketball player and a bit too spindly for the close quarters driving stuff….
You’ve been calling for him to play lock all tournament…
Banquo
Posts: 20902
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Banquo »

canta_brian wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 2:57 pm
p/d wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 2:41 pm On a positive note, the cricket is going well
I wouldn’t worry, if it’s like last time when England didn’t win you’ll come up with some daft rule that says they did.
ooh, chew them sours. Enzid clear favourites for this one imo
Last edited by Banquo on Sat Oct 21, 2023 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Banquo
Posts: 20902
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:26 pm
jngf wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 1:51 pm Lawes used to be able to, but that was when he still played lock and had a little more ballast - now he’s the build of an erstatz basketball player and a bit too spindly for the close quarters driving stuff….
You’ve been calling for him to play lock all tournament…
buuuurn
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 18217
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Puja »

Mellsblue wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:26 pm
jngf wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 1:51 pm Lawes used to be able to, but that was when he still played lock and had a little more ballast - now he’s the build of an erstatz basketball player and a bit too spindly for the close quarters driving stuff….
You’ve been calling for him to play lock all tournament…
Let's not denigrate him for updating his opinions, even if somewhat belatedly!

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16128
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: SF v SA

Post by Mellsblue »

Puja wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 7:07 pm
Mellsblue wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 5:26 pm
jngf wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 1:51 pm Lawes used to be able to, but that was when he still played lock and had a little more ballast - now he’s the build of an erstatz basketball player and a bit too spindly for the close quarters driving stuff….
You’ve been calling for him to play lock all tournament…
Let's not denigrate him for updating his opinions, even if somewhat belatedly!

Puja
Fair enough.
User avatar
Spiffy
Posts: 2210
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 4:13 pm

Re: SF v SA photo

Post by Spiffy »

jngf wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 4:58 pmAnthropomorthic?
That Faff deKlerk dog actually looks a lot like Faff.
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4569
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Galfon »

Wow - biggest boo ever by the French for ref. O'Keefe...
not that they bear a grudge :shock:
User avatar
Galfon
Posts: 4569
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 8:07 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Galfon »

Faz actually sang 'Queen' rather than 'King' i am sure..maybe good omen.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5945
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: SF v SA

Post by Stom »

lol, thought that was a legal steal.

Hopefully a sign of things to come
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 16128
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: SF v SA

Post by Mellsblue »

Oh, god. We’re going to win.
Danno
Posts: 2138
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Danno »

Lol nah.
Danno
Posts: 2138
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Danno »

Are we.... accelerating into contact and fighting for ground? Is that legal?
16th man
Posts: 1977
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by 16th man »

Anyone else thrown by 10 minutes of solid execution?
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5945
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: SF v SA

Post by Stom »

16th man wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 8:12 pm Anyone else thrown by 10 minutes of solid execution?
Lol, yeah. It feels weird
Banquo
Posts: 20902
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Banquo »

Stom wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 8:13 pm
16th man wrote: Sat Oct 21, 2023 8:12 pm Anyone else thrown by 10 minutes of solid execution?
Lol, yeah. It feels weird
good esp mitchell
Banquo
Posts: 20902
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: SF v SA

Post by Banquo »

spoke too soon dumb
Post Reply