RugbyRebels

morepork wrote:Is every mutha returning to the board, like wildebeest after the dry season?

My season was wet. Windy too

UKHamlet wrote:

Zhivago wrote:No, UG is gone forever.

He applied for membership of the old board last week.

He applied for membership as it's winding down? Really?

cashead wrote:

UKHamlet wrote:

Zhivago wrote:No, UG is gone forever.

He applied for membership of the old board last week.

He applied for membership as it's winding down? Really?

Really. This is probably no coincidence in UG land.

UKHamlet wrote:

cashead wrote:

UKHamlet wrote: He applied for membership of the old board last week.

He applied for membership as it's winding down? Really?

Really. This is probably no coincidence in UG land.

So he's on to us, then. Time to wrap up the surveillance, lads.

The shite board was clearly a false flag operation.

Open your eyes sheeple

It was the rugby equivalent of waterboarding.

Alls I want to know now is who's snipers they were.


And why a referendum by the actual residents of the Falkland Islands that overwhelmingly stated that they'd rather stick with the Brits than be a part of Argentina apparently doesn't count.

And speaking of UG, I wonder if his little twink lackey Canute will be joining us. This place sure won't be the same without his unearned condescension, smug superiority and progressively broken reasoning.

where's my smiley hammy ?


sent from my bed

Tre wrote:Did we ever find out?

Ask Leopold Bloom.

tigran wrote:where's my smiley hammy ?


sent from my bed

What smiley would that be?

cashead wrote:Alls I want to know now is who's snipers they were.


And why a referendum by the actual residents of the Falkland Islands that overwhelmingly stated that they'd rather stick with the Brits than be a part of Argentina apparently doesn't count.

So why does the West (Britain included) seem so unwilling to accept a similar referendum in the Crimea?

rowan wrote:

cashead wrote:Alls I want to know now is who's snipers they were.


And why a referendum by the actual residents of the Falkland Islands that overwhelmingly stated that they'd rather stick with the Brits than be a part of Argentina apparently doesn't count.

So why does the West (Britain included) seem so unwilling to accept a similar referendum in the Crimea?

The Crimean referendum did not follow proper procedure, for starters.

Also, lol at rowan for going around trying to police any mention of Russia's recent actions.

The Crimean referendum did not follow proper procedure, for starters.

I see, So it's different when Crimeans vote overwhelmingly for a return to neighboring Russia. Meanwhile, Britons can freely rock up and occupy an island on the other side of the world, even when it's within another country's territorial waters - according to a recent UN ruling. So whose procedures are we talking about, exactly?

cashead wrote:Also, lol at rowan for going around trying to police any mention of Russia's recent actions.

That reads like an attempt to silence any dissenting viewpoints. Btw, are you not, threrefore, trying to police any mention of Britain's actions?

rowan wrote:The Crimean referendum did not follow proper procedure, for starters.

I see, So it's different when Crimeans vote overwhelmingly for a return to neighboring Russia. Meanwhile, Britons can freely rock up and occupy an island on the other side of the world, even when it's within another country's territorial waters - according to a recent UN ruling. So whose procedures are we talking about, exactly?

Yeah, OK, bro.

rowan wrote:

cashead wrote:Also, lol at rowan for going around trying to police any mention of Russia's recent actions.

That reads like an attempt to silence any dissenting viewpoints. Btw, are you not, threrefore, trying to police any mention of Britain's actions?

Of course it is. And it has, in no way, anything to do with the fact that you're actively looking for anyone shit-talking Putin in these threads when you're not bouncing on your boy Vlad's dick, and then taking issue with it months after the fact.

Vlad the Impaler.

cashead wrote:

rowan wrote:The Crimean referendum did not follow proper procedure, for starters.

I see, So it's different when Crimeans vote overwhelmingly for a return to neighboring Russia. Meanwhile, Britons can freely rock up and occupy an island on the other side of the world, even when it's within another country's territorial waters - according to a recent UN ruling. So whose procedures are we talking about, exactly?

Yeah, OK, bro.

rowan wrote:

cashead wrote:Also, lol at rowan for going around trying to police any mention of Russia's recent actions.

That reads like an attempt to silence any dissenting viewpoints. Btw, are you not, threrefore, trying to police any mention of Britain's actions?

Of course it is. And it has, in no way, anything to do with the fact that you're actively looking for anyone shit-talking Putin in these threads when you're not bouncing on your boy Vlad's dick, and then taking issue with it months after the fact.

Does it ever occur to you that you may be being lied to by the western ruling class?

Doesn't it ever pass your mind that the stuff they spew about 'enemies' here, there and everywhere doesn't actually make sense?

Not hating Putin is not the same as being a fan boy. But frankly, Putin and Lavrov stand head and shoulders above any, and I do mean any, Western political talking head in terms of intellect, ability, honesty and integrity.

You're being suckered by the warmongers and mass murderers that are the western elite.

And you need to grow up.

cashead wrote:

rowan wrote:

cashead wrote:Alls I want to know now is who's snipers they were.


And why a referendum by the actual residents of the Falkland Islands that overwhelmingly stated that they'd rather stick with the Brits than be a part of Argentina apparently doesn't count.

So why does the West (Britain included) seem so unwilling to accept a similar referendum in the Crimea?

The Crimean referendum did not follow proper procedure, for starters.

LOLz. As if you know what the 'proper procedure' would be.

Laughable naivety.

UGagain wrote:

cashead wrote:

rowan wrote:
So why does the West (Britain included) seem so unwilling to accept a similar referendum in the Crimea?

The Crimean referendum did not follow proper procedure, for starters.

LOLz. As if you know what the 'proper procedure' would be.

Laughable naivety.

It's hilarious how quickly you cry foul when you're perfectly happy to act like an utter fuckhead towards others.

cashead wrote:

UGagain wrote:

cashead wrote:
The Crimean referendum did not follow proper procedure, for starters.

LOLz. As if you know what the 'proper procedure' would be.

Laughable naivety.

It's hilarious how quickly you cry foul when you're perfectly happy to act like an utter fuckhead towards others.

You clearly have nothing worthwhile and you're not worth my time.

UGagain wrote:

cashead wrote:

rowan wrote:The Crimean referendum did not follow proper procedure, for starters.

I see, So it's different when Crimeans vote overwhelmingly for a return to neighboring Russia. Meanwhile, Britons can freely rock up and occupy an island on the other side of the world, even when it's within another country's territorial waters - according to a recent UN ruling. So whose procedures are we talking about, exactly?

Yeah, OK, bro.

rowan wrote:
That reads like an attempt to silence any dissenting viewpoints. Btw, are you not, threrefore, trying to police any mention of Britain's actions?

Of course it is. And it has, in no way, anything to do with the fact that you're actively looking for anyone shit-talking Putin in these threads when you're not bouncing on your boy Vlad's dick, and then taking issue with it months after the fact.

Does it ever occur to you that you may be being lied to by the western ruling class?

Doesn't it ever pass your mind that the stuff they spew about 'enemies' here, there and everywhere doesn't actually make sense?

Not hating Putin is not the same as being a fan boy. But frankly, Putin and Lavrov stand head and shoulders above any, and I do mean any, Western political talking head in terms of intellect, ability, honesty and integrity.

You're being suckered by the warmongers and mass murderers that are the western elite.

And you need to grow up.

You recognise (western) propaganda well enough, but you fail to appreciate that propaganda can be based on fact. In the case of Russia, there is not a great need to exaggerate reality when you have undeniable aggression like that seen in Crimea and Donbass.

You lose all credibility when you highlight (rightly) aggression from one side in one instance and (hypocritically) dismiss it in another instance when the perpetrator is someone else.

You do yourself no favours.

Zhivago wrote:

UGagain wrote:

cashead wrote:
Yeah, OK, bro.



Of course it is. And it has, in no way, anything to do with the fact that you're actively looking for anyone shit-talking Putin in these threads when you're not bouncing on your boy Vlad's dick, and then taking issue with it months after the fact.

Does it ever occur to you that you may be being lied to by the western ruling class?

Doesn't it ever pass your mind that the stuff they spew about 'enemies' here, there and everywhere doesn't actually make sense?

Not hating Putin is not the same as being a fan boy. But frankly, Putin and Lavrov stand head and shoulders above any, and I do mean any, Western political talking head in terms of intellect, ability, honesty and integrity.

You're being suckered by the warmongers and mass murderers that are the western elite.

And you need to grow up.

You recognise (western) propaganda well enough, but you fail to appreciate that propaganda can be based on fact. In the case of Russia, there is not a great need to exaggerate reality when you have undeniable aggression like that seen in Crimea and Donbass.

You lose all credibility when you highlight (rightly) aggression from one side in one instance and (hypocritically) dismiss it in another instance when the perpetrator is someone else.

You do yourself no favours.

You're an utter fool.

A standing joke among Eastern Europeans in communist times was 'At least we know we're being lied to!' The West didn't, and in many cases (evidently) still doesn't.

UGagain wrote:

Zhivago wrote:

UGagain wrote:
Does it ever occur to you that you may be being lied to by the western ruling class?

Doesn't it ever pass your mind that the stuff they spew about 'enemies' here, there and everywhere doesn't actually make sense?

Not hating Putin is not the same as being a fan boy. But frankly, Putin and Lavrov stand head and shoulders above any, and I do mean any, Western political talking head in terms of intellect, ability, honesty and integrity.

You're being suckered by the warmongers and mass murderers that are the western elite.

And you need to grow up.

You recognise (western) propaganda well enough, but you fail to appreciate that propaganda can be based on fact. In the case of Russia, there is not a great need to exaggerate reality when you have undeniable aggression like that seen in Crimea and Donbass.

You lose all credibility when you highlight (rightly) aggression from one side in one instance and (hypocritically) dismiss it in another instance when the perpetrator is someone else.

You do yourself no favours.

You're an utter fool.

How? I'll willingly concede to your argument if you provide a good enough one.