Re: Lions Attrition - update.
Posted: Wed May 24, 2017 2:04 pm
Jesus....Haskell?
Oh Wawwen.
Oh Wawwen.
I'd have suggested that its more the lack of options on the flank for England which has prompted the shift to 6. If there were a genuine world class 6 available, or even a good international standard one, then Itoje would have battled it out in the second row. You have an embarrassing depth of talent in the second row and I get why its tempting to get all of them on the pitch together, but that's risky. England might decide its worth the investment, but the lions is here and now so for me Itoje is a lock or not playing.Mikey Brown wrote:Again, Itoje didn't really play much at 6 at all. He just didn't have a particularly impressive 6 nations. You could argue though that Lawes's massive improvements, playing at 6, were aided by having 2 locks doing the work?
I don't disagree, though think you maybe misunderstood my post or I wasn't clear. I don't think Itoje (or Lawes) is best at 6, I was just pointing out that Itoje wasn't really playing there. That experiment seemed to get dropped pretty quickly. I don't think Itoje was all that impressive in the 6 nations but that seems to keep getting attributed to him playing (wearing) 6, rather than him just being a gobby penalty machine for most of the tournament.Sandydragon wrote:I'd have suggested that its more the lack of options on the flank for England which has prompted the shift to 6. If there were a genuine world class 6 available, or even a good international standard one, then Itoje would have battled it out in the second row. You have an embarrassing depth of talent in the second row and I get why its tempting to get all of them on the pitch together, but that's risky. England might decide its worth the investment, but the lions is here and now so for me Itoje is a lock or not playing.Mikey Brown wrote:Again, Itoje didn't really play much at 6 at all. He just didn't have a particularly impressive 6 nations. You could argue though that Lawes's massive improvements, playing at 6, were aided by having 2 locks doing the work?
I probably mis-read. I agree that he hasn't been as effective as his breakthrough season. Still worth his tour spot though as he does offer a lot.Mikey Brown wrote:I don't disagree, though think you maybe misunderstood my post or I wasn't clear. I don't think Itoje (or Lawes) is best at 6, I was just pointing out that Itoje wasn't really playing there. That experiment seemed to get dropped pretty quickly. I don't think Itoje was all that impressive in the 6 nations but that seems to keep getting attributed to him playing (wearing) 6, rather than him just being a gobby penalty machine for most of the tournament.Sandydragon wrote:I'd have suggested that its more the lack of options on the flank for England which has prompted the shift to 6. If there were a genuine world class 6 available, or even a good international standard one, then Itoje would have battled it out in the second row. You have an embarrassing depth of talent in the second row and I get why its tempting to get all of them on the pitch together, but that's risky. England might decide its worth the investment, but the lions is here and now so for me Itoje is a lock or not playing.Mikey Brown wrote:Again, Itoje didn't really play much at 6 at all. He just didn't have a particularly impressive 6 nations. You could argue though that Lawes's massive improvements, playing at 6, were aided by having 2 locks doing the work?
As discussed in the Lions thread (and probably the EMB equivalent, assuming there is one), there won't be any of Barclay or Watson or any 7s or 6.5s called up until Warburton's pronounced "completely dead," (if he's just "mostly dead," Wazza will probably haul him over to Miracle Max's) and Haskell's playing style fits what Gatland would be looking for in his non-Warburton/Tipuric loose forwards.morepork wrote:Jesus....Haskell?
Oh Wawwen.
And Tipuric is only there grudgingly. Any excuse to ignore him would be gladly taken.cashead wrote:As discussed in the Lions thread (and probably the EMB equivalent, assuming there is one), there won't be any of Barclay or Watson or any 7s or 6.5s called up until Warburton's pronounced "completely dead," (if he's just "mostly dead," Wazza will probably haul him over to Miracle Max's) and Haskell's playing style fits what Gatland would be looking for in his non-Warburton/Tipuric loose forwards.morepork wrote:Jesus....Haskell?
Oh Wawwen.
If Gat's is not careful he'll be lined up as next England coach ...And Tipuric is only there grudgingly. Any excuse to ignore him would be gladly taken.
Mike Brown has probably packed up his hotel room, kissed goodbye to his sleeping roomie and booked a taxi to the airport. He's now sitting staring at his phone in an empty Buenos Aires hotel lobby with a soft toy lion on his knees thinking, 'Why hasn't he called yet? Why hasn't he called yet?'Galfon wrote:No obvious replacements for FB - Kearney is West Coast with his girl, and Armitage / Abendanon don't count.No doubt Mikey B will be sticking his hand up.
Real bad luck for Hogg, in the prime of his career.
Take Launch. Jonny G is busy.cashead wrote:Who's the next cab off the rank for the locks? One of the Gray boys? Launchbury?
The problem being that with his inability to give a pass he'll never be able to board the plane.ad_tigger wrote:Mike Brown has probably packed up his hotel room, kissed goodbye to his sleeping roomie and booked a taxi to the airport. He's now sitting staring at his phone in an empty Buenos Aires hotel lobby with a soft toy lion on his knees thinking, 'Why hasn't he called yet? Why hasn't he called yet?'Galfon wrote:No obvious replacements for FB - Kearney is West Coast with his girl, and Armitage / Abendanon don't count.No doubt Mikey B will be sticking his hand up.
Real bad luck for Hogg, in the prime of his career.
I can imagine Mike Brown could get quite angry in a busy airport.Numbers wrote:The problem being that with his inability to give a pass he'll never be able to board the plane.ad_tigger wrote:Mike Brown has probably packed up his hotel room, kissed goodbye to his sleeping roomie and booked a taxi to the airport. He's now sitting staring at his phone in an empty Buenos Aires hotel lobby with a soft toy lion on his knees thinking, 'Why hasn't he called yet? Why hasn't he called yet?'Galfon wrote:No obvious replacements for FB - Kearney is West Coast with his girl, and Armitage / Abendanon don't count.No doubt Mikey B will be sticking his hand up.
Real bad luck for Hogg, in the prime of his career.
Also in a quiet airport.skidger wrote:I can imagine Mike Brown could get quite angry in a busy airport.Numbers wrote:The problem being that with his inability to give a pass he'll never be able to board the plane.ad_tigger wrote:
Mike Brown has probably packed up his hotel room, kissed goodbye to his sleeping roomie and booked a taxi to the airport. He's now sitting staring at his phone in an empty Buenos Aires hotel lobby with a soft toy lion on his knees thinking, 'Why hasn't he called yet? Why hasn't he called yet?'
Top of a mountain with no other human within 20 miles...El Tigre wrote:Also in a quiet airport.skidger wrote:I can imagine Mike Brown could get quite angry in a busy airport.Numbers wrote:
The problem being that with his inability to give a pass he'll never be able to board the plane.
I see what you've done there. Very good.Numbers wrote:The problem being that with his inability to give a pass he'll never be able to board the plane.ad_tigger wrote:Mike Brown has probably packed up his hotel room, kissed goodbye to his sleeping roomie and booked a taxi to the airport. He's now sitting staring at his phone in an empty Buenos Aires hotel lobby with a soft toy lion on his knees thinking, 'Why hasn't he called yet? Why hasn't he called yet?'Galfon wrote:No obvious replacements for FB - Kearney is West Coast with his girl, and Armitage / Abendanon don't count.No doubt Mikey B will be sticking his hand up.
Real bad luck for Hogg, in the prime of his career.
I've heard he's replacing Barnes. It's a straight swap. (harsh on Andy. He's actually a quality pundit)Puja wrote:Just to note that Andy Goode has landed in NZ for a punditry role on literally the same day that Farrell goes down injured. It's meant to be.
Puja
Can we bid to send the fucker to someone we don't like? That seems far more reasonable to me. While we at it, whykk67 wrote:I've heard he's replacing Barnes. It's a straight swap. (harsh on Andy. He's actually a quality pundit)Puja wrote:Just to note that Andy Goode has landed in NZ for a punditry role on literally the same day that Farrell goes down injured. It's meant to be.
Puja
They're going to auction the chance to send Stuart home to the highest bidder. It's all for charidee, Folks. So dig deep.