Rugby Neology
- morepork
- Posts: 7511
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Rugby Neology
Unfortunately you missed and ended up in here
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- SerjeantWildgoose
- Posts: 2162
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm
- morepork
- Posts: 7511
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Rugby Neology
Imagine my surprise after finishing, turning the subject over and being confronted by the entirely unexpected hamlet of
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14526
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Rugby Neology
Edited the typo for you.SerjeantWildgoose wrote:I tried to get in her...
- rowan
- Posts: 7750
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
- Location: Istanbul
Re: Rugby Neology
& when, might I ask, did basic skills become core skills? 

If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
- rowan
- Posts: 7750
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
- Location: Istanbul
Re: Rugby Neology
Since when did signing a contract become inking a contract? In fact, since when was ink a verb 

If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 4:36 pm
Re: Rugby Neology
Some time after medalling!rowan wrote:Since when did signing a contract become inking a contract? In fact, since when was ink a verb
- rowan
- Posts: 7750
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
- Location: Istanbul
Re: Rugby Neology
You mean meddling, perhaps? Or is it really possible to say medalling i in an intelligible English sentence?welshsaint wrote:Some time after medalling!rowan wrote:Since when did signing a contract become inking a contract? In fact, since when was ink a verb

If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 4:36 pm
Re: Rugby Neology
Sadly medalling. As in England's chance of medalling at the Olympic games.rowan wrote:You mean meddling, perhaps? Or is it really possible to say medalling i in an intelligible English sentence?welshsaint wrote:Some time after medalling!rowan wrote:Since when did signing a contract become inking a contract? In fact, since when was ink a verb
- rowan
- Posts: 7750
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
- Location: Istanbul
Re: Rugby Neology
Ok, I didn't know that England actually went Olympicking. Isn't it supposed to be Britain, or the UK, or something?welshsaint wrote:Sadly medalling. As in England's chance of medalling at the Olympic games.rowan wrote:You mean meddling, perhaps? Or is it really possible to say medalling i in an intelligible English sentence?welshsaint wrote:
Some time after medalling!
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 4:36 pm
Re: Rugby Neology
They even get that wrong. They call it Team G B, when in fact it should be team U K, as it includes Northern Ireland, but the marketing people thought the former sounded more with it!rowan wrote:Ok, I didn't know that England actually went Olympicking. Isn't it supposed to be Britain, or the UK, or something?welshsaint wrote:Sadly medalling. As in England's chance of medalling at the Olympic games.rowan wrote:
You mean meddling, perhaps? Or is it really possible to say medalling i in an intelligible English sentence?
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Rugby Neology
I'm pretty sure it's formally "Team GB & NI". I also fail to understand why it couldn't just have been "Team UK".welshsaint wrote:They even get that wrong. They call it Team G B, when in fact it should be team U K, as it includes Northern Ireland, but the marketing people thought the former sounded more with it!rowan wrote:Ok, I didn't know that England actually went Olympicking. Isn't it supposed to be Britain, or the UK, or something?welshsaint wrote: Sadly medalling. As in England's chance of medalling at the Olympic games.
- belgarion
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:25 pm
- Location: NW England
Re: Rugby Neology
Technically should be Team 'UK of GB & NI' as the country's full 'name' is 'The United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland'Stones of granite wrote:I'm pretty sure it's formally "Team GB & NI". I also fail to understand why it couldn't just have been "Team UK".welshsaint wrote:They even get that wrong. They call it Team G B, when in fact it should be team U K, as it includes Northern Ireland, but the marketing people thought the former sounded more with it!rowan wrote:
Ok, I didn't know that England actually went Olympicking. Isn't it supposed to be Britain, or the UK, or something?
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent
- Stones of granite
- Posts: 1638
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm
Re: Rugby Neology
You’re right.belgarion wrote:Technically should be Team 'UK of GB & NI' as the country's full 'name' is 'The United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland'Stones of granite wrote:I'm pretty sure it's formally "Team GB & NI". I also fail to understand why it couldn't just have been "Team UK".welshsaint wrote:
They even get that wrong. They call it Team G B, when in fact it should be team U K, as it includes Northern Ireland, but the marketing people thought the former sounded more with it!
You win this round of pedant top trumps

- rowan
- Posts: 7750
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
- Location: Istanbul
Re: Rugby Neology
They really love to show off their mathematical skills on these rugby web sites, don't they
So now we've gone from five things we learned from,/i] or eight things we learned from, to five predictions for
Why not just write an article with an introduction, the required amount of paragraphs, and a conclusion, & let us do the counting (not that we'd ever bother)?

So now we've gone from five things we learned from,/i] or eight things we learned from, to five predictions for

Why not just write an article with an introduction, the required amount of paragraphs, and a conclusion, & let us do the counting (not that we'd ever bother)?

If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
- Lizard
- Posts: 3810
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
- Location: Dominating the SHMB
Re: Rugby Neology
TeamUK. Pronounced “Tea-Muck”Stones of granite wrote:I'm pretty sure it's formally "Team GB & NI". I also fail to understand why it couldn't just have been "Team UK".welshsaint wrote:They even get that wrong. They call it Team G B, when in fact it should be team U K, as it includes Northern Ireland, but the marketing people thought the former sounded more with it!rowan wrote:
Ok, I didn't know that England actually went Olympicking. Isn't it supposed to be Britain, or the UK, or something?
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
Dominating the SHMB
======================
- rowan
- Posts: 7750
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
- Location: Istanbul
Re: Rugby Neology
& what's this Team Blaa Blaa all about anyway? It's the UK. It's Canada. It's New Zealand for crying out loud.
We all know they're a freaking team
We all know they're a freaking team

If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
- morepork
- Posts: 7511
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Rugby Neology
This Fred is on life support.
- Buggaluggs
- Posts: 1251
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Rugby Neology
Have the Italians offered to host it back to life?morepork wrote:This Fred is on life support.
- rowan
- Posts: 7750
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
- Location: Istanbul
Re: Rugby Neology
So the All Blacks don't win games any more, they close them out - like an end-of-season merchandise sale. . . 

If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
- rowan
- Posts: 7750
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
- Location: Istanbul
Re: Rugby Neology
Rugby Championship previews basically recycle the same old headlines again and again. All Blacks weary of Pumas pack! Gosh, really?
Imagine if the coaches said what they really thought and the press actually reported it. All Blacks expect to kick ass! or NZ coach doesn't rate Argies, predicts easy win.
That would grab readers' attention a lot quicker than these tedious cliche headlines . . .

Imagine if the coaches said what they really thought and the press actually reported it. All Blacks expect to kick ass! or NZ coach doesn't rate Argies, predicts easy win.
That would grab readers' attention a lot quicker than these tedious cliche headlines . . .

If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?