Rugby Neology

User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7511
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by morepork »

Unfortunately you missed and ended up in here
Screen shot 2017-09-14 at 12.29.42 PM.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
J Dory
Posts: 987
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:54 pm

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by J Dory »

Nice Arse.
User avatar
SerjeantWildgoose
Posts: 2162
Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 3:31 pm

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by SerjeantWildgoose »

I stopped off here for a ...

Image

... cup of tea on the way.
Idle Feck
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7511
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by morepork »

Imagine my surprise after finishing, turning the subject over and being confronted by the entirely unexpected hamlet of
Screen shot 2017-09-15 at 5.11.01 PM.png
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14526
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by Mellsblue »

SerjeantWildgoose wrote:I tried to get in her...

Image
Edited the typo for you.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by rowan »

& when, might I ask, did basic skills become core skills? :roll:
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by rowan »

Since when did signing a contract become inking a contract? In fact, since when was ink a verb :roll:
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
welshsaint
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 4:36 pm

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by welshsaint »

rowan wrote:Since when did signing a contract become inking a contract? In fact, since when was ink a verb :roll:
Some time after medalling!
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by rowan »

welshsaint wrote:
rowan wrote:Since when did signing a contract become inking a contract? In fact, since when was ink a verb :roll:
Some time after medalling!
You mean meddling, perhaps? Or is it really possible to say medalling i in an intelligible English sentence? :?
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
welshsaint
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 4:36 pm

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by welshsaint »

rowan wrote:
welshsaint wrote:
rowan wrote:Since when did signing a contract become inking a contract? In fact, since when was ink a verb :roll:
Some time after medalling!
You mean meddling, perhaps? Or is it really possible to say medalling i in an intelligible English sentence? :?
Sadly medalling. As in England's chance of medalling at the Olympic games.
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by rowan »

welshsaint wrote:
rowan wrote:
welshsaint wrote:
Some time after medalling!
You mean meddling, perhaps? Or is it really possible to say medalling i in an intelligible English sentence? :?
Sadly medalling. As in England's chance of medalling at the Olympic games.
Ok, I didn't know that England actually went Olympicking. Isn't it supposed to be Britain, or the UK, or something?
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
welshsaint
Posts: 132
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 4:36 pm

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by welshsaint »

rowan wrote:
welshsaint wrote:
rowan wrote:
You mean meddling, perhaps? Or is it really possible to say medalling i in an intelligible English sentence? :?
Sadly medalling. As in England's chance of medalling at the Olympic games.
Ok, I didn't know that England actually went Olympicking. Isn't it supposed to be Britain, or the UK, or something?
They even get that wrong. They call it Team G B, when in fact it should be team U K, as it includes Northern Ireland, but the marketing people thought the former sounded more with it!
User avatar
Stones of granite
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by Stones of granite »

welshsaint wrote:
rowan wrote:
welshsaint wrote: Sadly medalling. As in England's chance of medalling at the Olympic games.
Ok, I didn't know that England actually went Olympicking. Isn't it supposed to be Britain, or the UK, or something?
They even get that wrong. They call it Team G B, when in fact it should be team U K, as it includes Northern Ireland, but the marketing people thought the former sounded more with it!
I'm pretty sure it's formally "Team GB & NI". I also fail to understand why it couldn't just have been "Team UK".
User avatar
belgarion
Posts: 267
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:25 pm
Location: NW England

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by belgarion »

Stones of granite wrote:
welshsaint wrote:
rowan wrote:
Ok, I didn't know that England actually went Olympicking. Isn't it supposed to be Britain, or the UK, or something?
They even get that wrong. They call it Team G B, when in fact it should be team U K, as it includes Northern Ireland, but the marketing people thought the former sounded more with it!
I'm pretty sure it's formally "Team GB & NI". I also fail to understand why it couldn't just have been "Team UK".
Technically should be Team 'UK of GB & NI' as the country's full 'name' is 'The United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland'
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent
User avatar
Stones of granite
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by Stones of granite »

belgarion wrote:
Stones of granite wrote:
welshsaint wrote:
They even get that wrong. They call it Team G B, when in fact it should be team U K, as it includes Northern Ireland, but the marketing people thought the former sounded more with it!
I'm pretty sure it's formally "Team GB & NI". I also fail to understand why it couldn't just have been "Team UK".
Technically should be Team 'UK of GB & NI' as the country's full 'name' is 'The United Kingdom of Great Britain & Northern Ireland'
You’re right.
You win this round of pedant top trumps :D
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by rowan »

They really love to show off their mathematical skills on these rugby web sites, don't they :roll:

So now we've gone from five things we learned from,/i] or eight things we learned from, to five predictions for :roll:

Why not just write an article with an introduction, the required amount of paragraphs, and a conclusion, & let us do the counting (not that we'd ever bother)? :idea:
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
Lizard
Posts: 3810
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 11:41 pm
Location: Dominating the SHMB

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by Lizard »

Stones of granite wrote:
welshsaint wrote:
rowan wrote:
Ok, I didn't know that England actually went Olympicking. Isn't it supposed to be Britain, or the UK, or something?
They even get that wrong. They call it Team G B, when in fact it should be team U K, as it includes Northern Ireland, but the marketing people thought the former sounded more with it!
I'm pretty sure it's formally "Team GB & NI". I also fail to understand why it couldn't just have been "Team UK".
TeamUK. Pronounced “Tea-Muck”
______________________
Dominating the SHMB
======================
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by rowan »

& what's this Team Blaa Blaa all about anyway? It's the UK. It's Canada. It's New Zealand for crying out loud.

We all know they're a freaking team :roll:
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
morepork
Posts: 7511
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by morepork »

This Fred is on life support.
User avatar
Buggaluggs
Posts: 1251
Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 2:50 pm

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by Buggaluggs »

morepork wrote:This Fred is on life support.
Have the Italians offered to host it back to life?
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by rowan »

So the All Blacks don't win games any more, they close them out - like an end-of-season merchandise sale. . . :roll:
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
User avatar
rowan
Posts: 7750
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:21 pm
Location: Istanbul

Re: Rugby Neology

Post by rowan »

Rugby Championship previews basically recycle the same old headlines again and again. All Blacks weary of Pumas pack! Gosh, really? :roll:

Imagine if the coaches said what they really thought and the press actually reported it. All Blacks expect to kick ass! or NZ coach doesn't rate Argies, predicts easy win.

That would grab readers' attention a lot quicker than these tedious cliche headlines . . . :idea:
If they're good enough to play at World Cups, why not in between?
Post Reply