Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Moderator: Puja

User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6361
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by Oakboy »

What a joy to see a FH step round a few and set something up. No wonder Eddie likes the lad.
Banquo
Posts: 19093
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote:What a joy to see a FH step round a few and set something up. No wonder Eddie likes the lad.
very Ford like :)
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14556
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by Mellsblue »

There aren't many things funnier than watching a lanky lock at full speed. Thank you Charlie 'intercept' Matthews.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by 16th man »

Jono Ross may be shaping up as a bit of a Jerome Schuster contender. Looks well off the pace.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by 16th man »

Well, that's 2 tries from the 2 times we've managed to not drop the ball in the Quinn's half
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by 16th man »

Right Carley, it may gave been a knock on, but then Visser kicks it forwards and Quin's are offside when they jump on it, so maybe you can understand why Ross is a bit peed off.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by 16th man »

16th man wrote:Right Carley, it may gave been a knock on, but then Visser kicks it forwards and Quin's are offside when they jump on it, so maybe you can understand why Ross is a bit peed off, especially when you've said you've clearly seen it but it takes 5 replays to actually tell he didn't get it down for the try.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5836
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by Stom »

Stom wrote:Could be a try fest...neither team has the best defense.
Well, guess I was right...
Banquo
Posts: 19093
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by Banquo »

Stom wrote:
Stom wrote:Could be a try fest...neither team has the best defense.
Well, guess I was right...
nailed it, quins less bad without the ball than Sale. Though a couple of quins tries were excellent.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5836
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by Stom »

Banquo wrote:
Stom wrote:
Stom wrote:Could be a try fest...neither team has the best defense.
Well, guess I was right...
nailed it, quins less bad without the ball than Sale. Though a couple of quins tries were excellent.
Marchant looking a cut above at times, for me.

And Smith does not act like an 18 year old. He's got some ability.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5975
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by Scrumhead »

Just got home from the game. On the whole it was a very pleasing performance. I certainly felt as though we were a lot better value for our bonus point than Sale were for theirs.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17648
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by Puja »

Stom wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Stom wrote:
Well, guess I was right...
nailed it, quins less bad without the ball than Sale. Though a couple of quins tries were excellent.
Marchant looking a cut above at times, for me.

And Smith does not act like an 18 year old. He's got some ability.
Indeed. There's some clear things to work on, but he's got things that you can't teach. His timing of the pass for the last try was utterly sublime.

Was disappointed in BCurry today. Opportunity to show Eddie why he deserves to be in the EPS and he didn't get into the game apart from tackles. No competition for the ball, no trailing of runners looking for offloads, and I'm not sure he actually carried the ball. Deservedly given the shepherd's crook and Sale looked much better with Ioane.

Puja
Backist Monk
fivepointer
Posts: 5890
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by fivepointer »

Highlight was watching Marcus Smith who does look a very fine talent. Lowlight was the injury to Clifford, which will probably rule him out of the AI's . This guy isnt getting much luck with injuries. Collier's early departure will be a concern.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14556
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by Mellsblue »

Puja wrote:
Stom wrote:
Banquo wrote: nailed it, quins less bad without the ball than Sale. Though a couple of quins tries were excellent.
Marchant looking a cut above at times, for me.

And Smith does not act like an 18 year old. He's got some ability.
Was disappointed in BCurry today. Opportunity to show Eddie why he deserves to be in the EPS and he didn't get into the game apart from tackles. No competition for the ball, no trailing of runners looking for offloads, and I'm not sure he actually carried the ball. Deservedly given the shepherd's crook and Sale looked much better with Ioane.

Puja
I agree he was poor but he did try and turnover ball, albeit comparatively rarely. On at least one I thought Quins were lucky not to be pinged for holding on and he did slow down a few others. It seems a deliberate tactic across all teams to go for less turnovers and just fan out across the pitch.

I'd love to see stats for turnovers at the breakdown for this season compared to this time last year. It may well prove me wrong but from the games I've seen there is a conscious decision not to compete as much at ruck time for 'jackals' due to the new laws.
User avatar
Oakboy
Posts: 6361
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by Oakboy »

Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:What a joy to see a FH step round a few and set something up. No wonder Eddie likes the lad.
very Ford like :)

If only! :(

I am resigned to never seeing it from Ford IF Farrell is at 12. It's pure guesswork but I think Smith could have the character to tell Farrell (and Eddie, if necessary) to f/o whereas Ford, in my prejudiced opinion, seems to shelve character and, therefore, flair if he is alongside Farrell. The obvious solution is to give Ford a run for a few games with T'eo at 12 but I don't think Eddie will. Had Saracens been starting Farrell regularly, there might have been hope of resting him.
Banquo
Posts: 19093
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by Banquo »

Oakboy wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Oakboy wrote:What a joy to see a FH step round a few and set something up. No wonder Eddie likes the lad.
very Ford like :)

If only! :(

I am resigned to never seeing it from Ford IF Farrell is at 12. It's pure guesswork but I think Smith could have the character to tell Farrell (and Eddie, if necessary) to f/o whereas Ford, in my prejudiced opinion, seems to shelve character and, therefore, flair if he is alongside Farrell. The obvious solution is to give Ford a run for a few games with T'eo at 12 but I don't think Eddie will. Had Saracens been starting Farrell regularly, there might have been hope of resting him.
You are right, its utter guesswork.
16th man
Posts: 1668
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm

Re: Quins v Sale Fri 7.45

Post by 16th man »

Mellsblue wrote:
Puja wrote:
Stom wrote:
Marchant looking a cut above at times, for me.

And Smith does not act like an 18 year old. He's got some ability.
Was disappointed in BCurry today. Opportunity to show Eddie why he deserves to be in the EPS and he didn't get into the game apart from tackles. No competition for the ball, no trailing of runners looking for offloads, and I'm not sure he actually carried the ball. Deservedly given the shepherd's crook and Sale looked much better with Ioane.

Puja
I agree he was poor but he did try and turnover ball, albeit comparatively rarely. On at least one I thought Quins were lucky not to be pinged for holding on and he did slow down a few others. It seems a deliberate tactic across all teams to go for less turnovers and just fan out across the pitch.

I'd love to see stats for turnovers at the breakdown for this season compared to this time last year. It may well prove me wrong but from the games I've seen there is a conscious decision not to compete as much at ruck time for 'jackals' due to the new laws.
Last night was a good reminder that pinning hopes on a 19 year old is a bit premature. Sale were pretty badly outmuscled for the first hour. Hopefully when he's developed fully he'll be part of the solution to that issue, but last night he was definitely part of the problem.
Post Reply