Stom wrote:I'm going to have to fundamentally disagree there.Oakboy wrote:Now, those are two worthy debates.Stom wrote:
Does this not say that Jones has done a good job? All in all, that is.
Or perhaps that the gap between internationals and the AP is wider than ever.
Jones, IMO, is simply a results merchant. His career track record is fairly short of long-term, constructive development. Basically, in employer-terms, it is win or frick off. Maybe, just maybe, a few players will prove to have been significantly improved by his regime.
The gap issue, I'm not sure about. I still believe that a combined XV from Saracens and Exeter could beat all but a few international teams. Swap out the foreigners for the likes of Daly, Cipriani and Launchbury and you have a team that should be up with the top group. I'm convinced that it is largely about 'producing it on the day'. After the 6N I have major reservations, not about the players, but Jones's ability to do that. In 5 matches he produced not a single 'best possible' performance.
A combined Sarries and Exeter team would beat most club sides hands down, sure. But I'm not convinced it would step up to international level.
They are two well oiled machines, not built on individuals. And they play two very different systems. Do you pick the majority from 1 of them and use their system? A system that failed in Europe?
Well, you'd have to assume that it was a different head coach from both so you'd be backing the players to adapt to a new system, not unreasonably.