Saints v Quins

Moderator: Puja

Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Scrumhead »

Mellsblue wrote:Wtf are Quins wearing?!?!
Don’t - it’s disgusting ...
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Mellsblue »

It looks a lot like someone had a heavy night on the Midori and then puked in the kit bag.
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by twitchy »

I also kept thinking saints were wasps at the beginning of the game.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1695
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Adam_P »

I'm sure that Reinach try was a try, you could see the ball on the line quite clearly
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by twitchy »

Well done quins.
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by twitchy »

Game on.
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by twitchy »

Stop "apologising for the language" you tit.
Tigersman
Posts: 1540
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:11 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Tigersman »

twitchy wrote:Stop "apologising for the language" you tit.
I apologise for Twitchy's language if any is offended
Tigersman
Posts: 1540
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:11 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Tigersman »

Lol Vesty.
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by twitchy »

That was a crazy drop. He had caught it.
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by twitchy »

Great try.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Scrumhead »

Tigersman wrote:Lol Vesty.
Literally the best thing that happened in this game. :lol:
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5839
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Stom »

Quins have been pants, mainly.
Tigersman
Posts: 1540
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:11 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Tigersman »

Saints got away with that Gibson had his hands all over the floor before his second push.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Scrumhead »

Yep. Hands in well after the ruck was formed.

All told, I’ll take a losing BP after a crappy performance like that.
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by twitchy »

Agreed on the last bit.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Mellsblue »

That was a pretty dire match.
User avatar
Stom
Posts: 5839
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Stom »

BTW, Symonds is not looking like the player I hoped he'd be :(
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Scrumhead »

Early days yet so I’m reserving judgement. The whole team was pretty poor last night.

White shouldn’t be anywhere near starting as that performance showed. Bothma was so much better when he came on it was like night and day. Hopefully Wallace’s injury isn’t serious and Kunatani will be ready to play soon.
fivepointer
Posts: 5893
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by fivepointer »

Bit flat all round i thought. Neither side looked crash hot, with mistakes regularly interrupting any kind of flow to the game.
Saints marginally more purposeful and having the benefit of 2 excellent locks.
One thing struck me about Quins was the absolutely dire quality of their offensive breakdown work. They will have to clear rucks far better than that if they are to improve.
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14561
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Mellsblue »

Yep. That was a bit of a reality check for Quins after last weekends result.
Two games in and you can see Boyd’s influence already. I think there will need to be a change of personnel in the backs to play the new plan with some success. One of those changes might not be possible with their new, shiny and expensive flyhalf.
I thought the game peaked at Collins’ run and Smith’s cover tackle. That that happened in first 10 mins says a lot.
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1695
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Adam_P »

We still have Kellaway and Naiyaravoro to come in the backs, which I think will help. I think this 9, 10, 12 combination could be very useful given some time together.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Scrumhead »

Mellsblue wrote:Yep. That was a bit of a reality check for Quins after last weekends result.
Two games in and you can see Boyd’s influence already. I think there will need to be a change of personnel in the backs to play the new plan with some success. One of those changes might not be possible with their new, shiny and expensive flyhalf.
I thought the game peaked at Collins’ run and Smith’s cover tackle. That that happened in first 10 mins says a lot.
Reality check? I’m not sure anyone was getting carried away.

I had some confidence we could get a result against a Saints side I’d see as mid-table rivals, but I certainly wasn’t expecting a win.
Tigersman
Posts: 1540
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:11 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Tigersman »

Adam_P wrote:We still have Kellaway and Naiyaravoro to come in the backs, which I think will help. I think this 9, 10, 12 combination could be very useful given some time together.
Naiyaravoro was quite rusty still in the A game, apparently dropped quite a few simple ones.
Scrumhead
Posts: 5983
Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:33 am

Re: Saints v Quins

Post by Scrumhead »

Unpopular as he may be, I thought Mallinder was good when he came on too.
Post Reply