Post-AI team selection.
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 5895
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: Post-AI team selection.
Certainly the time for experimentation is gone. Its now about getting the preferred starting XV - or as much of it as injuries allow - onto the pitch.
Its also time to make some tough calls on a few players.
The 6N squad should be pretty close to the WC one.
Its also time to make some tough calls on a few players.
The 6N squad should be pretty close to the WC one.
-
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: Post-AI team selection.
Dors, Billy and Manu will be included.Oakboy wrote:There are only 9 matches before the RWC. Jones is set on 31 players, he says. There should now be minimal chopping and changing.
Selection decisions should only be about those remaining few places and, the hard bit, being hard-nosed about whether those still injured for Dublin or who are injury-prone can justify a RWC squad place.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6373
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
p/d wrote:Dors, Billy and Manu will be included.Oakboy wrote:There are only 9 matches before the RWC. Jones is set on 31 players, he says. There should now be minimal chopping and changing.
Selection decisions should only be about those remaining few places and, the hard bit, being hard-nosed about whether those still injured for Dublin or who are injury-prone can justify a RWC squad place.
I hope so but I'd rather either was left out if not fully up to top club form/fitness by the time we play in Dublin. We simply have to build the team unit. It is more important than any individual.
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:30 pm
Re: Post-AI team selection.
When did he say this?Oakboy wrote:There are only 9 matches before the RWC. Jones is set on 31 players, he says.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6373
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
Before the Australia match.Freddo wrote:When did he say this?Oakboy wrote:There are only 9 matches before the RWC. Jones is set on 31 players, he says.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14561
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
BBC Sport users have selected their England XV:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm
Re: Post-AI team selection.
Those forwards aren't far from what I would pick at all…Mellsblue wrote:BBC Sport users have selected their England XV…
I'd probably have Launchbury instead of Lawes - but wouldn't complain
And I'd prefer Curry, Kvesic (unproven - I know), or Willis over Underhill - as I think it's more balanced
The backs don't surprise me, but it really isn't the style of rugby I want us to be playing
Give the ball to the biggest back on the charge, and hope he makes ground. Rinse. Repeat.
It's like Gatball ++
Oh what I wouldn't give to see: Robson - Cirpiani - May - Williams - Joseph - Daly - Watson…
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
TBH, when the BBC sport users are so close to what you would pick, you know the core of the team is pretty much spot on.
I think we'd all pick Mako, George, Sinckler, Itoje, Wilson, Billy, May and Daly (though probably not at FB). The only ?s are at 5, 7, 9, 10, 11/15, 12 and 13. Which pretty much shows...
WE ALL DISAGREE ON HOW ATTACKS PLAY!
Our pack almost picks itself. Our backs are a mess. We have a choice from Fatty Arbuckle, "ref, there's a player lying within 6 foot of me" and an OAP at 9. We've got BOSH BOSH BOSH in the midfield or balance. Wing is the only "nice" decision we have.
I think we'd all pick Mako, George, Sinckler, Itoje, Wilson, Billy, May and Daly (though probably not at FB). The only ?s are at 5, 7, 9, 10, 11/15, 12 and 13. Which pretty much shows...
WE ALL DISAGREE ON HOW ATTACKS PLAY!
Our pack almost picks itself. Our backs are a mess. We have a choice from Fatty Arbuckle, "ref, there's a player lying within 6 foot of me" and an OAP at 9. We've got BOSH BOSH BOSH in the midfield or balance. Wing is the only "nice" decision we have.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6373
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
Cokanasiga as a starter after 2 games v Japan and a crap Australian team? He might be good but I'd not pick him in our best back three if Watson is fit to play at FB. May and Daly are our best two wingers.
I'd pick Lawes and Launchbury ahead of Itoje.
I'd pick Lawes and Launchbury ahead of Itoje.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9178
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: Post-AI team selection.
I'd start him in the 6N - because there's only so much time to get him accustomed to the pace at international level, and I think hes shown enough to deserve a place on the plane to Japan (barring a collapse in form).Oakboy wrote:Cokanasiga as a starter after 2 games v Japan and a crap Australian team? He might be good but I'd not pick him in our best back three if Watson is fit to play at FB. May and Daly are our best two wingers.
Give him another 400-500 minutes of international rugby, and the fact that he brings something so vary different (and useful) to the other contenders; and he's got a good chance of starting on merit.
- Oakboy
- Posts: 6373
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 9:42 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
I can see that argument but would you risk him in Dublin? There's a possibility of him getting his confidence shattered. Maybe start Nowell with JC on the bench if Watson is not fit.Which Tyler wrote:I'd start him in the 6N - because there's only so much time to get him accustomed to the pace at international level, and I think hes shown enough to deserve a place on the plane to Japan (barring a collapse in form).Oakboy wrote:Cokanasiga as a starter after 2 games v Japan and a crap Australian team? He might be good but I'd not pick him in our best back three if Watson is fit to play at FB. May and Daly are our best two wingers.
Give him another 400-500 minutes of international rugby, and the fact that he brings something so vary different (and useful) to the other contenders; and he's got a good chance of starting on merit.
-
- Posts: 404
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:03 pm
Re: Post-AI team selection.
Nowells out for 9 weeksOakboy wrote:I can see that argument but would you risk him in Dublin? There's a possibility of him getting his confidence shattered. Maybe start Nowell with JC on the bench if Watson is not fit.Which Tyler wrote:I'd start him in the 6N - because there's only so much time to get him accustomed to the pace at international level, and I think hes shown enough to deserve a place on the plane to Japan (barring a collapse in form).Oakboy wrote:Cokanasiga as a starter after 2 games v Japan and a crap Australian team? He might be good but I'd not pick him in our best back three if Watson is fit to play at FB. May and Daly are our best two wingers.
Give him another 400-500 minutes of international rugby, and the fact that he brings something so vary different (and useful) to the other contenders; and he's got a good chance of starting on merit.
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
I doubt he'd have his confidence shattered up against Earls, tbh...Oakboy wrote:I can see that argument but would you risk him in Dublin? There's a possibility of him getting his confidence shattered. Maybe start Nowell with JC on the bench if Watson is not fit.Which Tyler wrote:I'd start him in the 6N - because there's only so much time to get him accustomed to the pace at international level, and I think hes shown enough to deserve a place on the plane to Japan (barring a collapse in form).Oakboy wrote:Cokanasiga as a starter after 2 games v Japan and a crap Australian team? He might be good but I'd not pick him in our best back three if Watson is fit to play at FB. May and Daly are our best two wingers.
Give him another 400-500 minutes of international rugby, and the fact that he brings something so vary different (and useful) to the other contenders; and he's got a good chance of starting on merit.
But if Watson is fit, I would definitely start him at FB and have Daly back in the 11 shirt.
Big Joe in the 23 shirt, mind, if not starting.
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 12:18 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
Mellsblue wrote:BBC Sport users have selected their England XV:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/rugby-union/46356677
I just saw that and I agree with every position except hooker and right wing.
Hartley has to start all the important games. He's till the best leader England have.
I prefer Watson to May
Last edited by Rich on Tue Nov 27, 2018 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 12:18 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
And so would every one of England's opponents at the RWCMellsblue wrote:Oh what I wouldn't give to see: Robson - Cirpiani - May - Williams - Joseph - Daly - Watson…
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 12:18 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
Stom wrote:WE ALL DISAGREE ON HOW ATTACKS PLAY!
Our pack almost picks itself. Our backs are a mess. We have a choice from Fatty Arbuckle, "ref, there's a player lying within 6 foot of me" and an OAP at 9. We've got BOSH BOSH BOSH in the midfield or balance. Wing is the only "nice" decision we have.
On first phase ball you have two basic tactics:
Kick or Bosh
I believe you have to have a "Bosh" option in the midfield and another one in the back 3.
-
- Posts: 1308
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
A rampaging Ire in Dublin are enough to dent anyone's confidence. I agree with WT and want him heavily involved in the 6N. I was sceptical at the start of the season that he was anything other than a big quickish lump and got told off on one thread for inferring such. I'm totally on the bus now, I've seen enough in his game to be excited about what he can bring to the WC party. He kept pace with a full throttle May at one point on Sat in spite of looking like he's not moving that fast on his own in space.
He's made the transition to test rugby look easy in these AIs. I know Aus were poor on Sat but he couldn't do anything about that. We need to see him in more intense games: cue the 6Ns.
He's made the transition to test rugby look easy in these AIs. I know Aus were poor on Sat but he couldn't do anything about that. We need to see him in more intense games: cue the 6Ns.
Last edited by Beasties on Tue Nov 27, 2018 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 12:18 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
Stom wrote:I doubt he'd have his confidence shattered up against Earls, tbh...Oakboy wrote:I can see that argument but would you risk him in Dublin? There's a possibility of him getting his confidence shattered. Maybe start Nowell with JC on the bench if Watson is not fit.Which Tyler wrote: I'd start him in the 6N - because there's only so much time to get him accustomed to the pace at international level, and I think hes shown enough to deserve a place on the plane to Japan (barring a collapse in form).
Give him another 400-500 minutes of international rugby, and the fact that he brings something so vary different (and useful) to the other contenders; and he's got a good chance of starting on merit.
But if Watson is fit, I would definitely start him at FB and have Daly back in the 11 shirt.
Big Joe in the 23 shirt, mind, if not starting.
Watson didn't look exactly comfortable last time he played FB for England.
It's why I would like to see May given a go there in Dublin.
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Sun Feb 14, 2016 12:18 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
Oakboy wrote:...I can see that argument but would you risk him in Dublin? There's a possibility of him getting his confidence shattered. Maybe start Nowell with JC on the bench if Watson is not fit.
Why not let Cokanasiga shatter the confidence of a few Irish players ?
-
- Posts: 1308
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
May's tried FB in club rugby more than once. He's a wing.Rich wrote:Stom wrote:I doubt he'd have his confidence shattered up against Earls, tbh...Oakboy wrote:
I can see that argument but would you risk him in Dublin? There's a possibility of him getting his confidence shattered. Maybe start Nowell with JC on the bench if Watson is not fit.
But if Watson is fit, I would definitely start him at FB and have Daly back in the 11 shirt.
Big Joe in the 23 shirt, mind, if not starting.
Watson didn't look exactly comfortable last time he played FB for England.
It's why I would like to see May given a go there in Dublin.
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
Or, you know, lines, pace and maybe a score... Wasps were fantastic last season at scoring straight from a lineout or scrum, Glaws don't look quite as slick at it yet, but it's coming, England actually looked half handy at it at times too (Scotland being the high point a couple of years ago).Rich wrote:Stom wrote:WE ALL DISAGREE ON HOW ATTACKS PLAY!
Our pack almost picks itself. Our backs are a mess. We have a choice from Fatty Arbuckle, "ref, there's a player lying within 6 foot of me" and an OAP at 9. We've got BOSH BOSH BOSH in the midfield or balance. Wing is the only "nice" decision we have.
On first phase ball you have two basic tactics:
Kick or Bosh
I believe you have to have a "Bosh" option in the midfield and another one in the back 3.
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
Yeah, about that...Rich wrote:Stom wrote:I doubt he'd have his confidence shattered up against Earls, tbh...Oakboy wrote:
I can see that argument but would you risk him in Dublin? There's a possibility of him getting his confidence shattered. Maybe start Nowell with JC on the bench if Watson is not fit.
But if Watson is fit, I would definitely start him at FB and have Daly back in the 11 shirt.
Big Joe in the 23 shirt, mind, if not starting.
Watson didn't look exactly comfortable last time he played FB for England.
It's why I would like to see May given a go there in Dublin.
Not sure May's your man for the more...cerebral positions.
Wing is fine. "Where ball. Get ball. Run with ball."
FB...a little bit more complicated.
- Stom
- Posts: 5840
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: Post-AI team selection.
A back 3 of May, Daly and Watson running lines off Ford, Farrell, Tuilagi would be pretty damn effective.Raggs wrote:Or, you know, lines, pace and maybe a score... Wasps were fantastic last season at scoring straight from a lineout or scrum, Glaws don't look quite as slick at it yet, but it's coming, England actually looked half handy at it at times too (Scotland being the high point a couple of years ago).Rich wrote:Stom wrote:WE ALL DISAGREE ON HOW ATTACKS PLAY!
Our pack almost picks itself. Our backs are a mess. We have a choice from Fatty Arbuckle, "ref, there's a player lying within 6 foot of me" and an OAP at 9. We've got BOSH BOSH BOSH in the midfield or balance. Wing is the only "nice" decision we have.
On first phase ball you have two basic tactics:
Kick or Bosh
I believe you have to have a "Bosh" option in the midfield and another one in the back 3.
Shame we've not really had a chance to use it.
And I disagree on the idea you only have two ideas. There's such a thing as a backs move, too. Often involving dummy runners, pace out wide to stretch the defense and runners from deep. Bosh is not something you need at all. Bosh is just running at an opposition instead of around them. Joseph consistently made more meters than Te'o. Did he "bosh"? Did he fook. He used his feet to get round them, or half way round them. And it's that half way round you need to give the offload.
SBW at his peak was exceptional at it, and not just because of his power. He had good footwork to switch the point of contact very slightly.
Eastmond is excellent at it, too, and he's rather small...
It's why Ford is so effective as an attacking weapon: his delayed passes change the defenses positioning...only by a few cms but that's plenty to create a half gap.
-
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 11:12 pm
Re: Post-AI team selection.
I wish that I wanted the same team Rich did, as he's much more likely to see it…
Luckily though, he's also much more likely to see it fail
Luckily though, he's also much more likely to see it fail