Galfon wrote:You've got to start with Bill B's GS effort in 80.
First time in memory Eng approached matches with any sort of preparation and expected dominance up front.
Getting thrashed in Paris before then was a ritual.
Making Carling skip at 22 later on turned out to be a masterstroke - as a player he ran through opposing lines and passed slickly, which was odd.OT day v Oz, with the 2nd half blitz was a real blast-off for the team.
Underwood was a rare talent and true pro in a pre-Pro era.The surprise 93 sevens winning team in Embra fielded Rodber, Dayglo, Dawson, Harriman, Hopley, Sheasby and a few others.This was a rare group that took things to another level.
Deano was freaky in terms of natural strength & game awareness, but fell out of favour a few times due to pace.
Hill (s/h) looked the part but blew it as skip/chief belligerent.
Ubogu was mobile & powerful but can't recall scrum dominance.
Clarke never quite delivered consistently - not sure if selection, injury or skill-set.
Players who apart from injury could have gone onto greater things: Melville, Hall, Hopley.
Massive list of Ordinary Joes in this era reflecting quite a shallow elite pool pre-95.Redman was unlucky.
Thats pretty concise.
I also agree that before professionalism really got going in English rugby - between 20 and 15 years ago, an elite player pool was shallow.
We had a naturally gifted hooker in Cov called Steve Brain - also went to Rugby Lions. He got a few England caps and immediately preceded Brian Moores era. Moore mentions him in one of his books that he felt Brain was very talented and very strong and a threat to him, but Brain wasn't prepared to buy into the (professional) training standards and fitness/diet plans that were just in their infancy, Moore felt that was his angle to make the England 2 shirt his and embraced the training etc as his advantage,