Saints vs Tigers

Moderator: Puja

User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1706
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Adam_P »

I think Furbank is the most naturally gifted player in the squad
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote:Furbank is class. The line to put Naiyaravoro in space was glorious. Then a lovely wrap around (before almost butchering it).
Played against his dad :D
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14563
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:Furbank is class. The line to put Naiyaravoro in space was glorious. Then a lovely wrap around (before almost butchering it).
Played against his dad :D
Is there anybody from Bedford School whose dad you haven’t played with ;)
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:Furbank is class. The line to put Naiyaravoro in space was glorious. Then a lovely wrap around (before almost butchering it).
Played against his dad :D
Is there anybody from Bedford School whose dad you haven’t played with ;)
Prob not. Though I coached Fraser’s dad too
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Looked like two offences there...or...
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1706
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Adam_P »

Naiyaravoro and Reinach grab the ball at the same time, and there is no ruck formed so its fine
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Saints excellent ball in hand; Tigers lineout is a shambles as is their defence.
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Adam_P wrote:Naiyaravoro and Reinach grab the ball at the same time, and there is no ruck formed so its fine
They agree with you, but I thought Reinach had hands on first- I also thought the last pass was forward. It matters not what I think tho.
User avatar
Puja
Posts: 17694
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Puja »

Adam_P wrote:Naiyaravoro and Reinach grab the ball at the same time, and there is no ruck formed so its fine
I'd say the ref's got that wrong - surely the ruck's formed as soon as Harrison bridges over? I thought the new laws didn't require one from each team.

No complaints on the scoreline as a whole though - we still look a shambles.

Puja
Backist Monk
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1706
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Adam_P »

Banquo wrote:Saints excellent ball in hand; Tigers lineout is a shambles as is their defence.
Saints lineout has been pretty crap too. All the set piece has been a mess really, but the open play from Saints has made up for it
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14563
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:
Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote: Played against his dad :D
Is there anybody from Bedford School whose dad you haven’t played with ;)
Prob not. Though I coached Fraser’s dad too
Ah, thought you’d played with Dingwall’s dad too. I take back my flippant joke!
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Mellsblue wrote: Is there anybody from Bedford School whose dad you haven’t played with ;)
Prob not. Though I coached Fraser’s dad too
Ah, thought you’d played with Dingwall’s dad too. I take back my flippant joke!
I have, hence ‘too’
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Puja wrote:
Adam_P wrote:Naiyaravoro and Reinach grab the ball at the same time, and there is no ruck formed so its fine
I'd say the ref's got that wrong - surely the ruck's formed as soon as Harrison bridges over? I thought the new laws didn't require one from each team.

No complaints on the scoreline as a whole though - we still look a shambles.

Puja
Rick is only firmed if there is a Tigers player on his feet
User avatar
Mellsblue
Posts: 14563
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Mellsblue »

Banquo wrote:
Puja wrote:
Adam_P wrote:Naiyaravoro and Reinach grab the ball at the same time, and there is no ruck formed so its fine
I'd say the ref's got that wrong - surely the ruck's formed as soon as Harrison bridges over? I thought the new laws didn't require one from each team.

No complaints on the scoreline as a whole though - we still look a shambles.

Puja
Rick is only firmed if there is a Tigers player on his feet
Rick gets turned on by the strangest things.
Raggs
Posts: 3304
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Raggs »

Adam_P wrote:
Oakboy wrote:What is the current law interpretation about SHs twitching a shoulder at the ruck, pretending to start a passing movement? A feint is a feint. Should it not be penalised? Reinach often does it.
As far as I'm aware the scrum half dummying is not allowed. However almost all 9s in the league do it on every box kick
I've heard the odd ref warn about it.

I like Robsons version, rather than a twitch, fake move to kick etc, he makes a sudden move to look at the chargers positions. Much easier to claim innocence.
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Mellsblue wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Puja wrote:
I'd say the ref's got that wrong - surely the ruck's formed as soon as Harrison bridges over? I thought the new laws didn't require one from each team.

No complaints on the scoreline as a whole though - we still look a shambles.

Puja
Rick is only firmed if there is a Tigers player on his feet
Rick gets turned on by the strangest things.
Phnaaar
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Furbank is the new Foden
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Lol, Lol beat me to it; Tigers playing right into Saints hands
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Both Youngs have been pony today
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1706
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Adam_P »

Moon gives away a penalty, whilst being neck rolled
twitchy
Posts: 3280
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 9:04 am

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by twitchy »

Saints are great to watch when they chuck it about. Fantastic transformation when you think of the final years mallinder.
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Tigers tactics are brain dead. Hard to believe half backs are England’s starters tbh
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1706
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Adam_P »

That was Tigers best lineout so far. Hilariously bad
Banquo
Posts: 19147
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Banquo »

Adam_P wrote:Moon gives away a penalty, whilst being neck rolled
Have to ask, as it’s hard to be sure, do you follow Northampton ?
User avatar
Adam_P
Posts: 1706
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm

Re: Saints vs Tigers

Post by Adam_P »

Banquo wrote:
Adam_P wrote:Moon gives away a penalty, whilst being neck rolled
Have to ask, as it’s hard to be sure, do you follow Northampton ?
Haha, I am fully aware how one sided my live commentary is. I just can't help it. Especially against Leicester.
Post Reply