I wish someone would tell Tigers that. We just seem to stand and wait for something to happen.Digby wrote:Not me, my fitness levels wouldn't get me back onto the line in time to be charging out up and early. Actually this is a real area of strength for Farrell who works really hard off the ball, I don't love the mindset is locked on go forwards rather than scanning what's going on, but if you had to pick a default setting then go forwards is the best one to have.Danno wrote:Aaaaanyone on this board? Assuming we're all EQPmorepork wrote:Surely you can find someone else to fling the ball at a supporting runners face, kick out on the full and charge up out of line and miss tackles?
A Fazless midfield
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 3409
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: A Fazless midfield
-
- Posts: 19152
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: A Fazless midfield
His work rate off the ball is only strength if he does the right thing when he gets there. And he often doesn’t- for example flying up is only any use if you make the tackle and don’t leave a massive dog leg. Generally though, his scrambling defence and cover is very good.Digby wrote:Not me, my fitness levels wouldn't get me back onto the line in time to be charging out up and early. Actually this is a real area of strength for Farrell who works really hard off the ball, I don't love the mindset is locked on go forwards rather than scanning what's going on, but if you had to pick a default setting then go forwards is the best one to have.Danno wrote:Aaaaanyone on this board? Assuming we're all EQPmorepork wrote:Surely you can find someone else to fling the ball at a supporting runners face, kick out on the full and charge up out of line and miss tackles?
- Puja
- Posts: 17711
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: A Fazless midfield
I saw that post on the bottom of page 1, thought "I should make a quip about Tigers being the proof of that," turned to page 2 and found you'd beaten me to it.Epaminondas Pules wrote:I wish someone would tell Tigers that. We just seem to stand and wait for something to happen.Digby wrote:Not me, my fitness levels wouldn't get me back onto the line in time to be charging out up and early. Actually this is a real area of strength for Farrell who works really hard off the ball, I don't love the mindset is locked on go forwards rather than scanning what's going on, but if you had to pick a default setting then go forwards is the best one to have.Danno wrote:
Aaaaanyone on this board? Assuming we're all EQP
Puja
Backist Monk
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14566
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: A Fazless midfield
Yep. I used a couple examples of him flying out of the line during the NZ ‘loss’ at Twickenham to explain to/show my son why a defensive line is so important.Banquo wrote:His work rate off the ball is only strength if he does the right thing when he gets there. And he often doesn’t- for example flying up is only any use if you make the tackle and don’t leave a massive dog leg. Generally though, his scrambling defence and cover is very good.Digby wrote:Not me, my fitness levels wouldn't get me back onto the line in time to be charging out up and early. Actually this is a real area of strength for Farrell who works really hard off the ball, I don't love the mindset is locked on go forwards rather than scanning what's going on, but if you had to pick a default setting then go forwards is the best one to have.Danno wrote:
Aaaaanyone on this board? Assuming we're all EQP
I’d also rather a playmaker understands what is needed at any specific point in a game rather than just running around/go forward without thought.
I also hate the thought that working hard off the ball is a strength rather than just a prerequisite of playing for England.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: A Fazless midfield
Simply applying pressure is useful. It's not always going to work if an opponent has a skilled enough move called, that one Ireland executed on us a few years back was a peach, but clearly ramping up pressure even if it's not always accurate is a useful tool in rugby, even when an attack has time they can struggle to realise and exploit it.
-
- Posts: 19152
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: A Fazless midfield
Not individually generally though, bar attack stopping tackles.Digby wrote:Simply applying pressure is useful. It's not always going to work if an opponent has a skilled enough move called, that one Ireland executed on us a few years back was a peach, but clearly ramping up pressure even if it's not always accurate is a useful tool in rugby, even when an attack has time they can struggle to realise and exploit it.
-
- Posts: 19152
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: A Fazless midfield
YepMellsblue wrote:Yep. I used a couple examples of him flying out of the line during the NZ ‘loss’ at Twickenham to explain to/show my son why a defensive line is so important.Banquo wrote:His work rate off the ball is only strength if he does the right thing when he gets there. And he often doesn’t- for example flying up is only any use if you make the tackle and don’t leave a massive dog leg. Generally though, his scrambling defence and cover is very good.Digby wrote:
Not me, my fitness levels wouldn't get me back onto the line in time to be charging out up and early. Actually this is a real area of strength for Farrell who works really hard off the ball, I don't love the mindset is locked on go forwards rather than scanning what's going on, but if you had to pick a default setting then go forwards is the best one to have.
I’d also rather a playmaker understands what is needed at any specific point in a game rather than just running around/go forward without thought.
I also hate the thought that working hard off the ball is a strength rather than just a prerequisite of playing for England.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: A Fazless midfield
This is where his awe inspiring leadership comes in driving others ahead to ever greater things. Mostly it works, sadly mostly still leaves a lot of holes across 80 minutesBanquo wrote:Not individually generally though, bar attack stopping tackles.Digby wrote:Simply applying pressure is useful. It's not always going to work if an opponent has a skilled enough move called, that one Ireland executed on us a few years back was a peach, but clearly ramping up pressure even if it's not always accurate is a useful tool in rugby, even when an attack has time they can struggle to realise and exploit it.