EQP by position
Moderator: Puja
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: EQP by position
Just throw a few quid to Wasps and draft Barbeary straight in at 12
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2016 8:19 am
Re: EQP by position
You'd think that Simmonds (J) could play at 12 - he's like Farrell, only quicker and better at kickingRaggs wrote:Think Simonds has played a bit at 12 (and 15).
With the right time there - so in particular he could develop his understanding of defense in the position - I reckon he could be brilliant.
And he's probably our best kicker too
- Stom
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: EQP by position
Could pair him with Smith, then. Get the best of both worlds.TheNomad wrote:You'd think that Simmonds (J) could play at 12 - he's like Farrell, only quicker and better at kickingRaggs wrote:Think Simonds has played a bit at 12 (and 15).
With the right time there - so in particular he could develop his understanding of defense in the position - I reckon he could be brilliant.
And he's probably our best kicker too
-
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 11:17 am
Re: EQP by position
Baxter will keep him at 10 then.TheNomad wrote:You'd think that Simmonds (J) could play at 12 - he's like Farrell, only quicker and better at kickingRaggs wrote:Think Simonds has played a bit at 12 (and 15).
With the right time there - so in particular he could develop his understanding of defense in the position - I reckon he could be brilliant.
And he's probably our best kicker too
-
- Posts: 3426
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: EQP by position
Raggs wrote:Baxter will keep him at 10 then.TheNomad wrote:You'd think that Simmonds (J) could play at 12 - he's like Farrell, only quicker and better at kickingRaggs wrote:Think Simonds has played a bit at 12 (and 15).
With the right time there - so in particular he could develop his understanding of defense in the position - I reckon he could be brilliant.
And he's probably our best kicker too
He'd be mad not to.
-
- Posts: 5908
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: EQP by position
Converting a 10 is an idea, or how about a winger to 12? Gordon D'arcy made a very successful switch some years ago for Ireland so it can be done.
We've seen Wasps use Odogwu at 13 - jury still out on that one - but is there anyone else out there who might have the skillset to adjust to a new role?
Jack Nowell seems an obvious candidate but are there others.
We've seen Wasps use Odogwu at 13 - jury still out on that one - but is there anyone else out there who might have the skillset to adjust to a new role?
Jack Nowell seems an obvious candidate but are there others.
- Stom
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: EQP by position
For 12?fivepointer wrote:Converting a 10 is an idea, or how about a winger to 12? Gordon D'arcy made a very successful switch some years ago for Ireland so it can be done.
We've seen Wasps use Odogwu at 13 - jury still out on that one - but is there anyone else out there who might have the skillset to adjust to a new role?
Jack Nowell seems an obvious candidate but are there others.
Surely the most important thing for a convert is that they have the handling skills already. Nowell doesn't.
Of all the back 3 players who could make a fist of 12...
Brown could have. Goode could have.
Mallinder obviously has played plenty at 12. Not sure there's anyone else I'd want to see there who has played in the back 3. I mean, Thorley would do well I reckon, but you'd just negate his biggest assets. Simmons could, perhaps, but he's small and has only just (re)converted. Coka possibly, but his brother already plays there.
- Which Tyler
- Posts: 9241
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 8:43 pm
- Location: Tewkesbury
- Contact:
Re: EQP by position
If you're looking for a current back3 player to shift to 2, then Mallinder and DeGlanville would be the obvious choices - both of whom converted to the back 3 from FH (same goes for Goode - I'm not convinced that Brown could have though)Stom wrote:For 12?
Surely the most important thing for a convert is that they have the handling skills already. Nowell doesn't.
Of all the back 3 players who could make a fist of 12...
Brown could have. Goode could have.
Mallinder obviously has played plenty at 12. Not sure there's anyone else I'd want to see there who has played in the back 3. I mean, Thorley would do well I reckon, but you'd just negate his biggest assets. Simmons could, perhaps, but he's small and has only just (re)converted. Coka possibly, but his brother already plays there.
-
- Posts: 12170
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: EQP by position
It’s between Sam Simmonds, Alfie Barbeary and Tom Youngs for me.
- Stom
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 10:57 am
Re: EQP by position
TdG is a good call, actually. Think he'd be good there.Which Tyler wrote:If you're looking for a current back3 player to shift to 2, then Mallinder and DeGlanville would be the obvious choices - both of whom converted to the back 3 from FH (same goes for Goode - I'm not convinced that Brown could have though)Stom wrote:For 12?
Surely the most important thing for a convert is that they have the handling skills already. Nowell doesn't.
Of all the back 3 players who could make a fist of 12...
Brown could have. Goode could have.
Mallinder obviously has played plenty at 12. Not sure there's anyone else I'd want to see there who has played in the back 3. I mean, Thorley would do well I reckon, but you'd just negate his biggest assets. Simmons could, perhaps, but he's small and has only just (re)converted. Coka possibly, but his brother already plays there.
But yeah, Mikey nails it: SSimmonds or Barbeary.
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: EQP by position
That just made me smileStom wrote: For 12?
Surely the most important thing for a convert is that they have the handling skills already. Nowell doesn't.
Brown could have.
- Mellsblue
- Posts: 14573
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 7:58 am
Re: EQP by position
Ha!p/d wrote:That just made me smileStom wrote: For 12?
Surely the most important thing for a convert is that they have the handling skills already. Nowell doesn't.
Brown could have.
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: EQP by position
Why would Mike 'Die With the Ball' Brown not have had enough hands to play centre for England?
- Puja
- Posts: 17730
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: EQP by position
In his defence, his hands were pretty decent in close quarters. It was out wide where he got his reputation from always looking at a defensive line and believing that he stood a better chance of breaking it than the man outside him.
Puja
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: EQP by position
His hands were bad, but not as amusing as the trait he had for a long time of kicking the ball back if it was kicked to his left and running it back were it kicked to his right, rarely does one see a supposed test standard player so consistently respond like one of Pavlov's dogs
-
- Posts: 8454
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:10 pm
Re: EQP by position
Most international centres worth their salt would have run straight through him at 12. Goode would have had to bulk up substantially to play there and that might have killed his footwork.Stom wrote:For 12?fivepointer wrote:Converting a 10 is an idea, or how about a winger to 12? Gordon D'arcy made a very successful switch some years ago for Ireland so it can be done.
We've seen Wasps use Odogwu at 13 - jury still out on that one - but is there anyone else out there who might have the skillset to adjust to a new role?
Jack Nowell seems an obvious candidate but are there others.
Surely the most important thing for a convert is that they have the handling skills already. Nowell doesn't.
Of all the back 3 players who could make a fist of 12...
Brown could have. Goode could have.
Mallinder obviously has played plenty at 12. Not sure there's anyone else I'd want to see there who has played in the back 3. I mean, Thorley would do well I reckon, but you'd just negate his biggest assets. Simmons could, perhaps, but he's small and has only just (re)converted. Coka possibly, but his brother already plays there.
Young Freddie Steward could be a candidate to move from 15 to 12 but seems a bit of a waste when he's so good under the high ball and has an absolute cannon of a right foot. Built like an athletic lock or blindside he's a good defender and can throw a big pass.
Pop Sam Simmonds in there. Explosive ball carrying, big tackles and offloads. Hybrid player time.
-
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 5:38 pm
Re: EQP by position
And so another thread trends inexorably towards the conclusion that all that matters is getting back rowers on the pitch....
-
- Posts: 3426
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:19 pm
Re: EQP by position
Or converting people to 12 on, well, I'm not sure what criteria. Thorley, Cokanasiga, Brown, Steward





-
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2017 9:41 pm
Re: EQP by position
After over a decade of mediocre 12s we've all become a bit desperateEpaminondas Pules wrote:Or converting people to 12 on, well, I'm not sure what criteria. Thorley, Cokanasiga, Brown, Steward![]()
![]()
![]()

- Puja
- Posts: 17730
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: EQP by position
Tbh, if you offered me a peak Brad Barritt right now, I would take your hand off at the wrist.Danno wrote:After over a decade of mediocre 12s we've all become a bit desperateEpaminondas Pules wrote:Or converting people to 12 on, well, I'm not sure what criteria. Thorley, Cokanasiga, Brown, Steward![]()
![]()
![]()
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 3828
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 1:45 pm
Re: EQP by position
IndeedPuja wrote:Tbh, if you offered me a peak Brad Barritt right now, I would take your hand off at the wrist.Danno wrote:After over a decade of mediocre 12s we've all become a bit desperateEpaminondas Pules wrote:Or converting people to 12 on, well, I'm not sure what criteria. Thorley, Cokanasiga, Brown, Steward![]()
![]()
![]()
Puja
-
- Posts: 13436
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: EQP by position
'Tis an interesting thing to look at a side struggling for fluency in attack and conclude Barritt is any part of an acceptable answer. Why not just say you'd take Burgess back while you're at it? (obviously supposing the wide beating hadn't happened, as is he shouldn't be in anyone's side)
- Puja
- Posts: 17730
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: EQP by position
That's a terrible comparison. Barritt ran decent lines, was decent on the crash ball, had solid enough hands, and was great in defence. Not an all-star by any means, but he'd certainly be a good foil to Slade at 13. Whereas [redacted] was getting to be a decent flanker before he ran home to mummy, but had still had no idea where to stand or what to do in the centre and made up for it by being big and having tonnes and tonnes of "character".Digby wrote:'Tis an interesting thing to look at a side struggling for fluency in attack and conclude Barritt is any part of an acceptable answer. Why not just say you'd take Burgess back while you're at it? (obviously supposing the wide beating hadn't happened, as is he shouldn't be in anyone's side)
Puja
Backist Monk
-
- Posts: 12170
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 5:10 pm
Re: EQP by position
Yup, Barritt was not often the spark of life needed between Farrell and Tuilagi in the Burt era, but between Ford and Slade/Joseph I think he could have offered something. Realistically though when was his peak? Has he actually retired yet? He's one of those guys who will probably always be capable of turning in the odd performance through sheer grit, but his body must be feeling it.
- Puja
- Posts: 17730
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 9:16 pm
Re: EQP by position
Mikey Brown wrote:Yup, Barritt was not often the spark of life needed between Farrell and Tuilagi in the Burt era, but between Ford and Slade/Joseph I think he could have offered something. Realistically though when was his peak? Has he actually retired yet? He's one of those guys who will probably always be capable of turning in the odd performance through sheer grit, but his body must be feeling it.
Puja
Backist Monk