Page 2 of 2

Re: Kurtley Beale to Wasps

Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 8:39 pm
by Lizard
I'm sure that even if he's not playing, Beale can contribute off the field with his professionalism, leadership and mentoring.

Re: Kurtley Beale to Wasps

Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 9:07 pm
by oldbackrow
Lizard wrote:I'm sure that even if he's not playing, Beale can contribute off the field with his professionalism, leadership and mentoring.
Cough,cough, cough, absolutely. Perhaps he can advise/mentor the lads in the academy :o

Re: Kurtley Beale to Wasps

Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 9:27 pm
by Len
oldbackrow wrote:
Lizard wrote:I'm sure that even if he's not playing, Beale can contribute off the field with his professionalism, leadership and mentoring.
Cough,cough, cough, absolutely. Perhaps he can advise/mentor the lads in the academy :o
Teach them how to beer bong like a boss.

Re: Kurtley Beale to Wasps

Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 9:32 pm
by morepork
After a few bongs, they can have some sleeping pills and paint the town red.

Re: Kurtley Beale to Wasps

Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 10:09 pm
by Digby
Peej wrote:
twitchy wrote:
Peej wrote:I wonder if there's some kind of get-out clause based on injury?
He probably already had a medical which means they are screwed. An amazing waste of money.
Except insurance will cover it, I would think, so have lost out on the player rather than money
I assume he's insured, but I don't know how the injury rules work for the cap, or rather players outside the cap.

Re: Kurtley Beale to Wasps

Posted: Sun May 15, 2016 12:04 pm
by Banquo
Digby wrote:
Peej wrote:
twitchy wrote:
He probably already had a medical which means they are screwed. An amazing waste of money.
Except insurance will cover it, I would think, so have lost out on the player rather than money
I assume he's insured, but I don't know how the injury rules work for the cap, or rather players outside the cap.
His insurance isn't the issue I'd have thought (unless is a career ender), its twofold as to whether Wasps' covers this eventuality (you'd think so) and your point.

Re: Kurtley Beale to Wasps

Posted: Sun May 15, 2016 2:47 pm
by padprop
Out for 4-6 months. Season starts in 4 months don't it?

Re: Kurtley Beale to Wasps

Posted: Sun May 15, 2016 4:46 pm
by Digby
Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:
Peej wrote:
Except insurance will cover it, I would think, so have lost out on the player rather than money
I assume he's insured, but I don't know how the injury rules work for the cap, or rather players outside the cap.
His insurance isn't the issue I'd have thought (unless is a career ender), its twofold as to whether Wasps' covers this eventuality (you'd think so) and your point.
I was thinking about him being insured by Wasps to cover their salary spend. On the cap the entire spend allowed on injury cover used to be less than Beale's salary, so they may have a problem, but it might be players outside the cap works differently, if the rumours about Le Roux are true it would seem so

Re: Kurtley Beale to Wasps

Posted: Sun May 15, 2016 4:50 pm
by Banquo
Digby wrote:
Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:
I assume he's insured, but I don't know how the injury rules work for the cap, or rather players outside the cap.
His insurance isn't the issue I'd have thought (unless is a career ender), its twofold as to whether Wasps' covers this eventuality (you'd think so) and your point.
I was thinking about him being insured by Wasps to cover their salary spend. On the cap the entire spend allowed on injury cover used to be less than Beale's salary, so they may have a problem, but it might be players outside the cap works differently, if the rumours about Le Roux are true it would seem so
gotcha, and as conjectured above. It would be a tad unfair to be penalised when you can't use the player, though it seems not quite as dire as it first appeared. Though 4-6 months still likely means up to half the season missing, and who knows what player he will be after op and lay off.

Re: Kurtley Beale to Wasps

Posted: Sun May 15, 2016 7:50 pm
by Mellsblue
Banquo wrote:
Digby wrote:
Banquo wrote: His insurance isn't the issue I'd have thought (unless is a career ender), its twofold as to whether Wasps' covers this eventuality (you'd think so) and your point.
I was thinking about him being insured by Wasps to cover their salary spend. On the cap the entire spend allowed on injury cover used to be less than Beale's salary, so they may have a problem, but it might be players outside the cap works differently, if the rumours about Le Roux are true it would seem so
gotcha, and as conjectured above. It would be a tad unfair to be penalised when you can't use the player, though it seems not quite as dire as it first appeared. Though 4-6 months still likely means up to half the season missing, and who knows what player he will be after op and lay off.
On the plus side, he's unlikely to be picked for the AI's so soon after an injury. So, over the season, he may play as many games as Wasps anticipated.