Nice to see him eased in at Eden Park with low quality opposition.Banquo wrote:me too, solid first international startBig D wrote:I thought George had a decent game. Plenty of tackles made too.Banquo wrote: ouch. Bit harsh on George, whose throwing was top notch.
v AB'S - First Test
Moderators: Puja, Misc Forum Mod
- skidger
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: RE: Re: v AB'S - First Test
-
- Posts: 615
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2016 4:47 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Good test match, I thought there were periods when it looked like the ABs were going to run away with it but the Lions kept going and surprised me. I don't think the injuries to Smith and Crotty helped the ABs, Cruden has stagnated and isn't a patch on Barrett and Crotty was looking solid.
The Lions try was something special and there was another break, eventually breaking down when Watson pushed a pass, that was magical as well.
In the end it probably came down to the fact the Lions had maybe 3 opportunities and converted just one, while the ABs took their 3. I suspect this may be the closest the Lions get, at least in terms of performance. The ABs are usually rusty first test and as we gel hopefully those periods of dominance will get longer and longer.
Read and Smith my two ABs MOTM. Great to see Smith back to his best and Read leading from the front.
The Lions try was something special and there was another break, eventually breaking down when Watson pushed a pass, that was magical as well.
In the end it probably came down to the fact the Lions had maybe 3 opportunities and converted just one, while the ABs took their 3. I suspect this may be the closest the Lions get, at least in terms of performance. The ABs are usually rusty first test and as we gel hopefully those periods of dominance will get longer and longer.
Read and Smith my two ABs MOTM. Great to see Smith back to his best and Read leading from the front.
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1815
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Lawes had to be involved in the next test. He has been the form lock in the previous Lions fixtures and Kruis and AWJ were average to poor today. Yet again, the omission of Lauchbury is made to look laughable.
Though Teo went well at 12, especially defensively in the second half. Sinckler looked good when he came on, and I would have brought him on far earlier.
Though Teo went well at 12, especially defensively in the second half. Sinckler looked good when he came on, and I would have brought him on far earlier.
- skidger
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: v AB'S - First Test
I thought Lawes was so good in the last game that he could be even in the running to cover the back row from the bench let alone lock. I would like to see Kruis given another go but i think Lawes is needed somewhere on the pitch being a pain in the arse.Adam_P wrote:Lawes had to be involved in the next test. He has been the form lock in the previous Lions fixtures and Kruis and AWJ were average to poor today. Yet again, the omission of Lauchbury is made to look laughable.
Though Teo went well at 12, especially defensively in the second half. Sinckler looked good when he came on, and I would have brought him on far earlier.
Last edited by skidger on Sat Jun 24, 2017 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 20887
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
wouldn't underestimate Kruis's influence on the lineout, but he turned it over badly today.Adam_P wrote:Lawes had to be involved in the next test. He has been the form lock in the previous Lions fixtures and Kruis and AWJ were average to poor today. Yet again, the omission of Lauchbury is made to look laughable.
Though Teo went well at 12, especially defensively in the second half. Sinckler looked good when he came on, and I would have brought him on far earlier.
-
- Posts: 4503
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 10:46 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
ESPN has Farrell down as missing two tackles. I thought he missed at least 4.
Those walesonline ratings are a piss take.
Those walesonline ratings are a piss take.
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1815
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
A good argument if our line out was faultless, but it wasn't particularly great today. He coughed up a lot of ball around the park too. Having said that though I'd still go with Kruis paired with Lawes and Itjoe on the bench.Banquo wrote:wouldn't underestimate Kruis's influence on the lineout, but he turned it over badly today.Adam_P wrote:Lawes had to be involved in the next test. He has been the form lock in the previous Lions fixtures and Kruis and AWJ were average to poor today. Yet again, the omission of Lauchbury is made to look laughable.
Though Teo went well at 12, especially defensively in the second half. Sinckler looked good when he came on, and I would have brought him on far earlier.
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 12:45 am
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Cracking game!
Well done to Lions. What a try and fantastic effort.
The difference is in the forwards. The AB forwards kept ball alive, made Lions defense go backwards and scrum was v good.
The absence of Ben Smith and Crotty had an impact on the AB defense. Suspect that probably they wont feature in next games?
do they bring fekitoa as replacement?
AB forwards pack outstanding.
They need to work on midfield defense with ALB.SBW. Wings good but must make sure they dont spill the kick boxes.
For Lions, they should not have replaced Teo. Mistake because immediately ABs started using SBW.
They need to focus on forwards and how to use their 11/14 and 15 more.
Again it was a fantastic game. As an AB fan i was v impressed with the effort of Lions.
Well done to Lions. What a try and fantastic effort.
The difference is in the forwards. The AB forwards kept ball alive, made Lions defense go backwards and scrum was v good.
The absence of Ben Smith and Crotty had an impact on the AB defense. Suspect that probably they wont feature in next games?
do they bring fekitoa as replacement?
AB forwards pack outstanding.
They need to work on midfield defense with ALB.SBW. Wings good but must make sure they dont spill the kick boxes.
For Lions, they should not have replaced Teo. Mistake because immediately ABs started using SBW.
They need to focus on forwards and how to use their 11/14 and 15 more.
Again it was a fantastic game. As an AB fan i was v impressed with the effort of Lions.
-
- Posts: 20887
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Has Bin Smuff had problems with concussion before?
- skidger
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2016 9:09 am
Re: v AB'S - First Test
You get the impression some are when there is a rival that is Welsh like George getting a 4/10 but the ratings are pretty brutal right across the board.WaspInWales wrote:ESPN has Farrell down as missing two tackles. I thought he missed at least 4.
Those walesonline ratings are a piss take.
-
- Posts: 20887
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Our lineout was faultless until Owens came on, and furthermore hugely disrupted the the kiwi lineout, which kept us in the game early doors. I did say he turned it over.Adam_P wrote:A good argument if our line out was faultless, but it wasn't particularly great today. He coughed up a lot of ball around the park too. Having said that though I'd still go with Kruis paired with Lawes and Itjoe on the bench.Banquo wrote:wouldn't underestimate Kruis's influence on the lineout, but he turned it over badly today.Adam_P wrote:Lawes had to be involved in the next test. He has been the form lock in the previous Lions fixtures and Kruis and AWJ were average to poor today. Yet again, the omission of Lauchbury is made to look laughable.
Though Teo went well at 12, especially defensively in the second half. Sinckler looked good when he came on, and I would have brought him on far earlier.
-
- Posts: 499
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 6:03 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
On a seek and destroy mission tonight.morepork wrote:RETALLICKA
-
- Posts: 20887
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Nothing else mattersDoorzetbornandbred wrote:On a seek and destroy mission tonight.morepork wrote:RETALLICKA
-
- Posts: 6486
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 3:42 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Failure to convert good positions into scores has been a recurring flaw with these Lions. Get to 5m out of the tryline and you simply HAVE to score.jared_7 wrote:Good test match, I thought there were periods when it looked like the ABs were going to run away with it but the Lions kept going and surprised me. I don't think the injuries to Smith and Crotty helped the ABs, Cruden has stagnated and isn't a patch on Barrett and Crotty was looking solid.
The Lions try was something special and there was another break, eventually breaking down when Watson pushed a pass, that was magical as well.
In the end it probably came down to the fact the Lions had maybe 3 opportunities and converted just one, while the ABs took their 3. I suspect this may be the closest the Lions get, at least in terms of performance. The ABs are usually rusty first test and as we gel hopefully those periods of dominance will get longer and longer.
Read and Smith my two ABs MOTM. Great to see Smith back to his best and Read leading from the front.
Didnt see much evidence of NZ being rusty. Some of their attacking play, with quick ball, transfers and offloads was a joy to watch.
Felt NZ did their homework - as you would expect. Lions got no go forward, or penalties, from scrums and their driving maul was very well contained.
Lions did have some good periods and did score a great try, but the difference in quality was there for all to see by the end.
-
- Posts: 1552
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: v AB'S - First Test
I can't see the sense in dropping Te'o to pay Farrell there at all. The Lions backline visibly wilted when Te'o went off. Either play Farrell at 10 or not.
NZ's pace that they put on the game in the first half was stunning, I was shocked that the Lions managed to just about compete at that point. There were wave upon wave of incisive lightning attacks with amazing skill levels on display. I take my hat off to Aaron Smith (who has hardly been mentioned). What a player. Every breakdown was shifted on at breakneck speed, the guy's an absolute firefly. One mistake I counted by him. I'd defy any international team to not improve 20% with him at SH. Imagine those NZ players with Youngs at 9. They'd not look so clever then would they?
Wonderful first try for the Lions though. Absolute belter.
NZ's pace that they put on the game in the first half was stunning, I was shocked that the Lions managed to just about compete at that point. There were wave upon wave of incisive lightning attacks with amazing skill levels on display. I take my hat off to Aaron Smith (who has hardly been mentioned). What a player. Every breakdown was shifted on at breakneck speed, the guy's an absolute firefly. One mistake I counted by him. I'd defy any international team to not improve 20% with him at SH. Imagine those NZ players with Youngs at 9. They'd not look so clever then would they?
Wonderful first try for the Lions though. Absolute belter.
-
- Posts: 20887
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
whilst I agree, everyone but the EMB (and rest of the board) seems to think Faz a world class 10 and 12- Eddie even clearly thinks he's a good 12; Grant Fox said he sees no flaws in his game. I'm confused- I think what we saw from Faz today was what we normally see, but with less ball. Teo should have stayed on for sure.Beasties wrote:I can't see the sense in dropping Te'o to pay Farrell there at all. The Lions backline visibly wilted when Te'o went off. Either play Farrell at 10 or not.
NZ's pace that they put on the game in the first half was stunning, I was shocked that the Lions managed to just about compete at that point. There were wave upon wave of incisive lightning attacks with amazing skill levels on display. I take my hat off to Aaron Smith (who has hardly been mentioned). What a player. Every breakdown was shifted on at breakneck speed, the guy's an absolute firefly. One mistake I counted by him. I'd defy any international team to not improve 20% with him at SH. Imagine those NZ players with Youngs at 9. They'd not look so clever then would they?
Wonderful first try for the Lions though. Absolute belter.
and yes on Aaron Smith, he's been the best 9 for a while now, bar his dodgy night club phase or whatever it was. Read was even more impressive given he's hardly played.
-
- Posts: 279
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 2:56 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
I feel Russel should come onto the bench. He brings an attacking swagger to a game (check highlights of Scotland's test against Italy and Wallabies) that others can't, and replacing Farrell with Sexton, or visa versa, always seems to be pretty much swapping like with like.
- Adam_P
- Posts: 1815
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:14 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Absolutely agreed, was pretty unimpressed (though not surprised) when I saw Sexton coming on that it was Teo coming off rather than Farrell. I just don't get why everyone is so keen to shoe horn him into the side at all costs.Beasties wrote:I can't see the sense in dropping Te'o to pay Farrell there at all. The Lions backline visibly wilted when Te'o went off. Either play Farrell at 10 or not.
-
- Posts: 1552
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:31 am
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Tbf I didn't think Sexton brought much to the party. What he did bring was the exit of Te'o. Farrell shuffled sideways as did the NZ defence after that.
- Sandydragon
- Posts: 10299
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:13 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
It really didn't work today. Commentators talking about bringing the back three into the game, but all I saw was two fly halves passing the ball and no one getting over the gainline.Adam_P wrote:Absolutely agreed, was pretty unimpressed (though not surprised) when I saw Sexton coming on that it was Teo coming off rather than Farrell. I just don't get why everyone is so keen to shoe horn him into the side at all costs.Beasties wrote:I can't see the sense in dropping Te'o to pay Farrell there at all. The Lions backline visibly wilted when Te'o went off. Either play Farrell at 10 or not.
-
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 12:45 am
Re: v AB'S - First Test
So whats the info for AB injuries?
-B Smith HIA?
-Kaino concussion?
-Crotty hamstring?
-B Smith HIA?
-Kaino concussion?
-Crotty hamstring?
- morepork
- Posts: 7860
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Banquo wrote:Nothing else mattersDoorzetbornandbred wrote:On a seek and destroy mission tonight.morepork wrote:RETALLICKA
One
has No Remorse.
-
- Posts: 15261
- Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:17 am
Re: v AB'S - First Test
The Lions tried to fight fire with fire, but in the end we were left to watch their performance fade to black, sad but true.
-
- Posts: 20887
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: v AB'S - First Test
Enter Sandman, Digby, zzzzzzzzzzzzzDigby wrote:The Lions tried to fight fire with fire, but in the end we were left to watch their performance fade to black, sad but true.